Dr. Henry Lee testified across four days in August 1995 as a defense forensic expert, called by Barry Scheck to challenge the LAPD's evidence handling and crime scene procedures. His most damaging testimony came when he demonstrated that blood swatches had been improperly packaged while wet and that wet transfer imprint patterns on key evidence didn't add up — concluding bluntly that "something is wrong." Lee also analyzed imprint evidence at the Bundy walkway, bloodstain patterns, and argued that multiple assailants may have been present, though prosecutor Hank Goldberg's cross-examination extracted concessions on shoeprint contamination and blood transfer theory. Lee returned in the 1997 civil trial to reprise his role, again walking the jury through crime scene photographs and evidence-handling failures.