🎞️ O.J. Simpson Civil Deposition — Video & Transcript
◀ Home 📂 All Depositions 👤 O.J. Simpson
🎞️ 43 videos ⏱️ ~35.9 hours 📅 9 days
Address:
C:\DEPT103\OJ-DEPOSITION\

O.J. Simpson's Civil Deposition

9 days under oath · January 22 – February 27, 1996

Watch O.J. Simpson testify under oath about the night of June 12, 1994, the Bronco chase, the Kardashian letter, and the case that became Rufo et al. v. Simpson — with the YouTube video synced line-by-line to the official court reporter transcript. Click any ▶ on a transcript line to jump the video to that exact moment; click any pull quote here to land on the line with the video cued and ready to play.

43
YouTube videos
~35.9
hours of testimony
9
deposition days
57
key moments indexed
9 days, 5 weeks · Jan 22 – Feb 27, 1996
Jan 22Jan 26Feb 22Feb 27
🎞️
Video synced to transcript. Every transcript line on a deposition day page has a small ▶ marker. Click it - the YouTube video opens in a docked panel and seeks to that exact moment. Press play and the highlight follows the playhead as Simpson speaks.

The 9 Days, Day by Day

DAY
1

January 22, 1996

3 video parts · 1h 46m of testimony · 3,320 lines
Day 1 thumbnail
Direct examination of O.J. Simpson by Daniel Petrocelli
by Daniel Petrocelli ⚠️ 34 objections

Daniel Petrocelli conducts the opening session of O.J. Simpson's civil deposition — the first time Simpson has testified under oath about the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman. The session covers Simpson's preparation for the deposition, the 'O.J. Tells' video then in production, his personal history and associates as of June 1994, his relationship with the LAPD, and the events of June 17 including Simpson's admission that he was suicidal that week and wrote what amounted to a goodbye letter.

💬 Key moments
“That's the phone number: 1-800-OJTELLS.”
— O.J. Simpson
Simpson volunteers the video's telephone number while its title and anticipated release are being discussed.
▶️ Play this moment
“I thought that if I had harmed myself in any way, that they would read it to my friends.”
— O.J. Simpson
Simpson confirms the Kardashian letter was a suicide note, directly acknowledging suicidal intent on the morning of the Bronco chase.
▶️ Play this moment
“Evidently, yes.”
— O.J. Simpson
Simpson's flat, one-word admission when asked if he was suicidal that week — the affect is as striking as the content.
▶️ Play this moment
“He seemed to be a nice guy.”
— O.J. Simpson
Simpson characterizes Kato Kaelin as an acquaintance rather than a close friend.
▶️ Play this moment
“That's enough. That's enough.”
— Robert Baker
Baker cuts off Petrocelli's early questions about whether Simpson told the truth in prior statements — a signal of how aggressively the defense will manage Simpson's answers throughout.
▶️ Play this moment
DAY
2

January 23, 1996

5 video parts · 5h 9m of testimony · 5,820 lines
Day 2 thumbnail
Direct examination of O.J. Simpson by Daniel Petrocelli
by Daniel Petrocelli ⚠️ 14 objections

Petrocelli's resumed direct examination of Simpson covers a wide range of topics: the chain of custody of Simpson's black bag on June 13, his stay at Kardashian's house during the week after the murders, Simpson's denial of all drug use, his knowledge of Faye Resnick's intervention and Nicole's alleged drug use, calendar records maintained by assistant Cathy Randa (and whether she shredded documents), and Simpson's visits to the Bundy property in the days and weeks before the murders — including the layout of the property's entrances and the back alley walkway.

💬 Key moments
“Am I a potted plant?”
— Robert Baker
Baker's exasperated protest after Petrocelli repeatedly pushed drug questions past his instructions not to answer — one of the most memorable lines of the deposition.
▶️ Play this moment
“I hope so.”
— O.J. Simpson
Simpson's response when asked whether Cathy Randa shredded documents — a startling answer that Petrocelli immediately followed up on, revealing Simpson's awareness that shredding occurred during the trial.
▶️ Play this moment
“I especially want to hear things against his lawyer's advice.”
— John Kelly
Kelly (counsel for Nicole's estate) pointedly remarks after Baker scolds Simpson for volunteering information — illustrates the adversarial dynamics among counsel.
▶️ Play this moment
“She was in trouble. She did something she wasn't--she thought she was going to get in some trouble. She needed my help.”
— O.J. Simpson
Simpson's account of Nicole calling him crying in January 1994 about a drug-related incident — testimony that Kelly immediately interrupted with a recess request.
▶️ Play this moment
“Faye was talked--babbling. Faye was, in my judgment, totally plastered. So she was babbling, yes.”
— O.J. Simpson
Simpson's characterization of Faye Resnick's condition on June 5 or 6, days before the murders — establishes his awareness of her drug/alcohol state immediately before the killings.
▶️ Play this moment
Cross-examination of O.J. Simpson by Robert Baker
by Robert Baker ⚠️ 1 objection

Baker cross-examines Simpson about the precise sequence of items he carried from the Bronco to his front door on the night of the murders — cell phone case, two ball bags, a windbreaker, and a grip. Simpson twice corrects Baker's counts and pushes back on Baker's characterization that the white ball bag had been 'accidentally' left outside, insisting he didn't purposely leave it but it was still on his property.

💬 Key moments
“Your characterization of 'accidentally'--yeah. I don't know if it was accidental or it was there. I didn't purposely do it, but it was still on my property.”
— O.J. Simpson
Simpson resists Baker's loaded word choice, which matters because the white bag's location outside could be relevant to the prosecution's timeline of his movements.
▶️ Play this moment
“Four things.”
— O.J. Simpson
Simpson corrects Baker's count of three items to four — a small but telling detail showing Simpson is tracking the examination carefully and not letting mischaracterizations stand.
▶️ Play this moment
“Kato was talking about where for the flashlight and Juice, you know, 'Show me where.' So I kind of stopped what I was doing...”
— O.J. Simpson
Simpson narrates the Kato Kaelin flashlight interaction, placing himself in the Rockingham driveway area and explaining a distraction that caused him to set down the white bag.
▶️ Play this moment
Redirect examination of O.J. Simpson by Daniel Petrocelli
by Daniel Petrocelli ⚠️ 7 objections

Petrocelli methodically walks Simpson through the minute-by-minute sequence of his departure from Rockingham on the night of June 12, 1994 — tracking every bag, every light, every clock glance, and every phone ring. The examination focuses on inconsistencies in Simpson's account of the bags he carried, how limo driver Alan Park got through the gate (Simpson never buzzed him in), and a recreation Simpson staged at his house to demonstrate that lights couldn't be seen from the Ashford gate.

💬 Key moments
“Went and took a dump.”
— O.J. Simpson
Simpson's direct answer to Petrocelli's question about what he did after seeing the time.
▶️ Play this moment
“You'd have to ask God that.”
— O.J. Simpson
Simpson deflects a key question about why the house appeared dark — a detail relevant to where he was and what he was doing before leaving.
▶️ Play this moment
“Because he's a physicist.”
— Robert Baker
Baker's aside — followed by Simpson echoing 'He's a physicist and I'm not' — briefly broke the tension and revealed the defense team's sardonic posture toward the lighting line of questioning.
▶️ Play this moment
“I've done this with virtually everyone who's come into my house.”
— O.J. Simpson
Simpson said he regularly conducted the lighting demonstration and later identified lawyers and a film crew among those present.
▶️ Play this moment
“I said, 'I'm coming right down. I'm running late, I know. I'm coming right down.'”
— O.J. Simpson
Simpson's recollection of his call with Park states that he knew he was running late.
▶️ Play this moment
DAY
3

January 24, 1996

5 video parts · 4h 48m of testimony · 5,124 lines
Day 3 thumbnail
Direct examination of O.J. Simpson by Daniel Petrocelli
by Daniel Petrocelli ⚠️ 22 objections

Petrocelli methodically interrogates Simpson about the alarm system at Rockingham, his final interactions with Kato Kaelin on the night of June 12, the sequence of luggage consolidation and departure to the airport, and the limo ride with Alan Park. Baker repeatedly interrupts to block repetitive questioning and protect attorney-client privilege, creating sustained friction throughout. The session establishes key factual details about who had alarm codes, what Kaelin was asked to do, and Simpson's movements from 10 p.m. onward.

💬 Key moments
“Did you do any preparation for today's session, Mr. Simpson? Absolutely none. Read anything? Absolutely nothing.”
— Daniel Petrocelli / O.J. Simpson
Simpson claims zero preparation, which Petrocelli could later use to explain inconsistencies or, alternatively, to show the testimony is unrehearsed.
▶️ Play this moment
“I was wet. I know that. From? Jumping out of the shower, running downstairs, getting my thing together, getting in the plane -- I mean getting in the limo.”
— O.J. Simpson / Daniel Petrocelli
Simpson says he was wet during the limo ride and attributes it to getting out of the shower and rushing downstairs before departure.
▶️ Play this moment
“I would prefer not to say.”
— O.J. Simpson
Simpson refuses to disclose the location of his motion detector, citing cost of upgrading security after trial testimony — an unusual invocation of personal preference over legal obligation in a deposition.
▶️ Play this moment
“Because I hadn't really given Kato much thought when I was leaving, and then as I was settling down finally in the car, I started thinking about it.”
— O.J. Simpson
Simpson explains that he began thinking about Kaelin after settling into the car, accounting for why the subject arose during the ride.
▶️ Play this moment
“You are not going to try to trip him up by asking him the same question 15 times. That's not appropriate conduct at this deposition.”
— Robert Baker
Baker's combative defense strategy is on full display; Petrocelli's response — 'If he is telling the truth, he won't be tripped up' — is a clean on-the-record exchange about witness credibility.
▶️ Play this moment
DAY
4

January 25, 1996

5 video parts · 4h 32m of testimony · 4,372 lines
Day 4 thumbnail
Direct examination of O.J. Simpson by Daniel Petrocelli
by Daniel Petrocelli ⚠️ 14 objections

Petrocelli pressed Simpson on his movements the evening of June 12, 1994 — his McDonald's run with Kaelin, his testimony that he contemplated going to Paula Barbieri's house but changed his mind before entering the Bronco, and the gap in his whereabouts between 10:00 and 11:00 p.m. A major thread concerned the unrecorded portions of Simpson's police interview with Vannatter and Lange — Simpson claimed he answered questions fully both before and after the tape ran, but could not recall specifics. Baker called a recess during that questioning; Petrocelli objected to stopping in the middle of the examination.

💬 Key moments
“Before I went out to the Bronco, I was contemplating going to Paula's.”
— O.J. Simpson
Shows Simpson testified that he contemplated going to Paula's but changed his mind before entering the Bronco, which he said he entered only to move inside the gate.
▶️ Play this moment
“They said that, you know, 'You look tired. You want to go home, I know, and we want to get you out of here,' words to that effect.”
— O.J. Simpson
Simpson's account of how Vannatter and Lange persuaded him to waive counsel and speak without his lawyers — key for evaluating voluntariness of the police statement.
▶️ Play this moment
“Why don't you ask me?”
— O.J. Simpson
Simpson's response when Petrocelli asked what he told police about his 10–11 p.m. whereabouts; Baker called a recess immediately afterward.
▶️ Play this moment
“Absolutely none.”
— O.J. Simpson
Simpson's opening answer when asked if he prepared for the day's session — striking given that he gave a TV interview the night before.
▶️ Play this moment
“I didn't ask them to do anything but tell me what had happened to Nicole and let me go home.”
— O.J. Simpson
Simpson's characterization of his state of mind during the police interview, framing himself as a grieving ex-husband rather than a suspect.
▶️ Play this moment
DAY
5

January 26, 1996

5 video parts · 3h 47m of testimony · 4,082 lines
Day 5 thumbnail
Direct examination of O.J. Simpson by Daniel Petrocelli
by Daniel Petrocelli ⚠️ 18 objections

Petrocelli methodically questions Simpson about his whereabouts and visitors on the night of June 13 (after the murders), then pivots to a sustained examination of shoes and gloves — building toward the Bruno Magli shoe evidence and the Aris Isotoner gloves found at the crime scene. Simpson denies ever owning Bruno Magli shoes, calling them 'ugly-ass shoes,' and claims ignorance of the brand name, while Petrocelli presses him on his inability to identify virtually any clothing he owned.

💬 Key moments
“Because I know, if Bruno Magli makes shoes that look like the shoes they had in court that's involved in this case, I would have never owned those ugly-ass shoes.”
— O.J. Simpson
Simpson's categorical denial of ever owning Bruno Magli shoes — the shoes whose print was found at the crime scene — became one of the most famous lines of the entire civil case, later undermined by photographs showing him wearing them.
▶️ Play this moment
“I feel sorry for Ron Shipp, yes... I feel sorry that he's a troubled person, and I tried to help him before because he had some problems, and I tried to help him.”
— O.J. Simpson
Simpson preemptively discredits Ron Shipp — who would testify that Simpson told him he had dreams about killing Nicole — by painting him as a drug-addicted hanger-on.
▶️ Play this moment
“No. I don't believe so.”
— O.J. Simpson
Simpson's flat denial that he told Ron Shipp he had 'weird thoughts about killing Nicole' or dreamed about killing her — directly contradicting what Shipp testified to at the criminal trial.
▶️ Play this moment
“He asked if he could use my Jacuzzi... He told me he had a big blond, a 'Nicole type,' quote, unquote. 'You got to see this girl, OJ.'”
— O.J. Simpson
Simpson's characterization of Ron Shipp as a persistent, boundary-crossing moocher — framing him as unreliable and entitled — is part of a broader effort to undermine Shipp's credibility as a witness.
▶️ Play this moment
DAY
6

February 22, 1996

5 video parts · 4h 25m of testimony · 3,912 lines
Day 6 thumbnail
Direct examination of O.J. Simpson by Daniel Petrocelli
by Daniel Petrocelli ⚠️ 28 objections

Petrocelli examines O.J. Simpson about his 12-year relationship with Nicole, covering how they met in 1977, their living arrangements, infidelity, Nicole's pregnancies and abortions, and the January 1, 1989 domestic violence incident. Baker repeatedly instructs Simpson not to answer questions about extramarital affairs, while Simpson characterizes his relationship with Nicole as 'tremendous' and accuses responding officer Detective Edwards of being a racist liar who fabricated the claim that the 1989 fight was over Simpson sleeping with household staff.

💬 Key moments
“I believe he's a racist, is what I believe he is, and a liar.”
— O.J. Simpson
Simpson's characterization of Detective Edwards, who responded to the 1989 domestic violence call — sets up a racial animus defense against the officer's trial testimony.
▶️ Play this moment
“For the way it started, yes. Not for my actions, but the way it started. My actions, I was totally responsible for.”
— O.J. Simpson
Rare admission of personal responsibility for the 1989 physical assault on Nicole, while still deflecting blame for the argument's origin onto her.
▶️ Play this moment
“When a relationship got physical like that, it's hard to--I mean, it bothered us both.”
— O.J. Simpson
Simpson framing the 1989 incident as a mutual event that 'bothered us both,' minimizing his role as aggressor.
▶️ Play this moment
“I mean, when I said only time, I mean it's the only time that we were physically confronting one another. Nicole's hit me at times.”
— O.J. Simpson
Simpson deflecting by raising Nicole as a physical aggressor, while simultaneously minimizing her actions by noting he 'didn't call the police' — implicitly contrasting with her 1989 call.
▶️ Play this moment
“I thought we had had a great night; we had had, what I felt, a great--a great period of time together, and to me it was--for the argument to start the way it did was wrong.”
— O.J. Simpson
Simpson said he blamed Nicole for how the argument started while accepting total responsibility for his own actions.
▶️ Play this moment
DAY
7

February 23, 1996

5 video parts · 3h 39m of testimony · 3,034 lines
Day 7 thumbnail
Direct examination of O.J. Simpson by Daniel Petrocelli
by Daniel Petrocelli ⚠️ 22 objections

Day 7 of Petrocelli's examination of OJ Simpson covers his career background, his volatile relationship with Nicole, the 1993 911 call, Nicole's March 1993 letter, and his arthritis condition on June 11-12, 1994. Robert Baker repeatedly blocks questions about Simpson's infidelity and his relationship with Paula Barbieri, while friction between counsel escalates visibly by session's end.

💬 Key moments
“Bob Baker, held hostage, Day 7, for O.J. Simpson.”
— Robert Baker
Baker's sardonic self-introduction signals the grinding, adversarial pace of this deposition by its seventh day.
▶️ Play this moment
“That may have been the best one.”
— O.J. Simpson
In response to a question comparing the loudness of arguments across the relationship, Simpson characterized the October 25, 1993 screaming and yelling as possibly the most intense instance.
▶️ Play this moment
“No. I'd leave.”
— O.J. Simpson
The answer responds to a single question about whether Nicole's insults and profanity made Simpson feel like hitting her; Simpson said he would leave.
▶️ Play this moment
“Tough. I don't really care what you think.”
— Robert Baker
Baker's open contempt for Petrocelli, signaling the breakdown of professional courtesy between lead counsel by Day 7.
▶️ Play this moment
“Acute, I can't do anything. When it's acute, I need help to go to the restroom so I would say no.”
— O.J. Simpson
Simpson drawing a line between manageable arthritis and 'acute' episodes — effectively conceding he was functional on June 11-12 while trying to suggest diminished capacity.
▶️ Play this moment
Direct examination of O.J. Simpson by Michael Brewer
by Michael Brewer ⚠️ 9 objections

In this direct examination, Brewer questions Simpson about changes to the Rockingham property between June 12, 1994, the December OJTELLS videotape, and the deposition date, then examines his knowledge of reported blood evidence at Bundy and Rockingham. Brewer presses Simpson about offering no explanation or blood-specific questions when told blood was at Rockingham; Simpson says he was focused on Nicole, his children, and why he was handcuffed. The examination continues through the close with substantial questioning about the June 17 'To Whom It May Concern' letter, Simpson's reported pain and suicidal state, news coverage, and his recollection of that week's events.

💬 Key moments
“I knew that I hadn't deposited any blood at Nicole's house that night.”
— O.J. Simpson
Simpson's clearest denial — framed as personal knowledge, not impossibility, leaving open the theoretical question of whether his blood could be there from another time.
▶️ Play this moment
“If blood drops are placed there, they're not found, but go ahead.”
— Robert Baker
Baker's distinction between blood being placed and blood being found suggests, without expressly stating, a planted-evidence position.
▶️ Play this moment
“I wanted to be with Nicole, and that's what I attempted to do.”
— O.J. Simpson
Simpson's direct admission that his suicidal crisis on June 17th was framed as wanting to reunite with Nicole — emotionally charged and legally double-edged.
▶️ Play this moment
“I didn't think about blood drops. I was thinking about Nicole, my kids and why was I handcuffed.”
— O.J. Simpson
Simpson's explanation for offering no blood-related response when told about blood at Rockingham: he says he was thinking about Nicole, his children, and why he was handcuffed.
▶️ Play this moment
“It was a lie.”
— O.J. Simpson
Unusually blunt response about Bob Avila's NBC report on his demeanor in Chicago — Simpson's clearest, most emphatic denial of any specific media claim in this session.
▶️ Play this moment
DAY
8

February 26, 1996

5 video parts · 3h 52m of testimony · 3,035 lines
Day 8 thumbnail
Direct examination of O.J. Simpson by Michael Brewer
by Michael Brewer ⚠️ 7 objections

Brewer cross-examines Simpson on his return to Rockingham from Chicago on June 13, 1994 — covering his handcuffing, his decision to speak to detectives without a lawyer, and the police statement he gave that afternoon. The central thrust is using Simpson's own words from that statement (marked Exhibit 101) to pin him down on the blood evidence: first getting Simpson to acknowledge he told police 'if it's dripped it's what I dripped running around trying to leave,' then extracting the admission that he had no factual basis to make that claim.

💬 Key moments
“I know I'm the...number one target. And now you're telling me I got blood all over the place.”
— O.J. Simpson
Simpson's own words from his June 13 police statement — used to impeach his deposition claim that he wasn't thinking of himself as a suspect when he sat down with Vannatter and Lange.
▶️ Play this moment
“If -- if it's dripped it's what I dripped running around trying to leave.”
— O.J. Simpson
The critical admission from the police statement connecting his own blood to the Rockingham driveway drops — Brewer then forces Simpson to concede he had no factual basis to say this.
▶️ Play this moment
“I didn't have a basis really to believe it was mine.”
— O.J. Simpson
Direct contradiction of his police statement; Brewer uses this to argue Simpson was either lying to police or lying now.
▶️ Play this moment
“Bob Baker for OJ. Simpson, held hostage, Day 8.”
— Robert Baker
Defense counsel signaling exhaustion and frustration with the deposition marathon before a single question is asked.
▶️ Play this moment
“I didn't feel it. Did I read all of it?”
— O.J. Simpson
Simpson deflecting on the exact language of his cut — 'it was cut before, but I think I just opened it up again... I'm not sure, I didn't feel it' — underscoring the ambiguity he's tried to maintain about the origin of the June 12 wound.
▶️ Play this moment
DAY
9

February 27, 1996

5 video parts · 3h 54m of testimony · 3,178 lines
Day 9 thumbnail
Direct examination of O.J. Simpson by John Kelly
by John Kelly ⚠️ 14 objections

John Kelly examines OJ Simpson on day 9 of his civil deposition, methodically targeting the 9:30–10:45 p.m. window on June 12, 1994. Kelly presses the specificity of Simpson's disclosures: Simpson said Kato knew he was trying not to sleep and was preparing to leave for Chicago, while not identifying more specific disclosures to the other named people; Simpson separately said he was home. Kelly also establishes that the house was left unlocked and unalarmed, with Kato having no key. The session further covers Bruno Magli shoes, the 1984 Rockingham incident involving an officer Simpson said he was later told was Mark Fuhrman, and Simpson's media and professional background.

💬 Key moments
“I wouldn't wear those ugly shoes.”
— O.J. Simpson
Simpson characterizes the particular shoes shown at trial as shoes he would not wear; later he says he does not know whether he ever owned Bruno Magli shoes.
▶️ Play this moment
“The guy when I was handcuffed said, "We got sort of a problem. We got blood there. We got blood here." It was like blood was everywhere.”
— O.J. Simpson
Simpson's account of first learning about blood evidence at both Bundy and Rockingham — raises question of what he already knew.
▶️ Play this moment
“I considered him being Kato. That's the way I've always known him to be, and whatever that is Kato.”
— O.J. Simpson
Simpson's dismissive characterization of Kaelin as an unreliable witness, while simultaneously undercutting the significance of Kato's testimony about the thumping noises.
▶️ Play this moment
“Today I'm told it was Mark Fuhrman.”
— O.J. Simpson
Simpson says he was told by the time of the deposition that the unidentified officer at the 1984 Rockingham incident was Mark Fuhrman; he does not claim he recognized the officer then.
▶️ Play this moment
“It's o.j. in front of OJ.”
— Robert Baker
A brief orange-juice wordplay exchange among counsel.
▶️ Play this moment

Themes Across the 9 Days

Domestic Violence
Chain Of Custody
Police Procedure
Bronco
Blood
Paula Barbieri
Glove
Day 5Day 9 (2 days)
Kato Kaelin
Day 3Day 9 (2 days)
Rockingham
Day 7Day 8 (2 days)
Shoe Evidence
Day 5Day 9 (2 days)
Alibi
Day 4 (1 day)
Alternative Suspect
Day 2 (1 day)
Crime Scene
Day 2 (1 day)
Defense Strategy
Day 7 (1 day)
Discovery
Day 2 (1 day)
Fuhrman
Day 9 (1 day)
Motive
Day 1 (1 day)
Nicole Brown
Day 2 (1 day)
Witness Credibility
Day 5 (1 day)

Who's Who

Frequently Asked

When was O.J. Simpson deposed in the civil case?
O.J. Simpson was deposed over nine days between January 22 and February 27, 1996 in the wrongful death civil case brought by the Goldman and Brown families. It was the first time Simpson testified under oath about the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman, since he had not taken the stand in his criminal trial.
Who questioned O.J. Simpson during his civil deposition?
Lead plaintiff's counsel Daniel Petrocelli conducted the bulk of the examination across all nine days, with Michael Brewer taking over on Days 7 and 8 to cross-examine Simpson on the Rockingham blood evidence and his June 13 police statement. John Kelly, representing Nicole Brown Simpson's estate, handled Day 9, focusing on the unaccounted-for 9:30-10:45 p.m. window on the night of the murders. Simpson was defended throughout by Robert Baker.
What did O.J. Simpson say about the Bruno Magli shoes in his deposition?
Simpson categorically denied ever owning Bruno Magli shoes, telling Petrocelli he "would have never owned those ugly-ass shoes" and repeating on Day 9 "I wouldn't wear those ugly shoes." The denial became one of the most famous moments of the civil case because photographs later surfaced showing Simpson wearing exactly those shoes, whose bloody print was found at the Bundy crime scene.
Did O.J. Simpson admit the Kardashian letter was a suicide note?
Yes. On the opening day of the deposition, Simpson confirmed to Petrocelli that the letter he handed to Robert Kardashian on the morning of the Bronco chase was a goodbye letter, saying "I thought that if I had harmed myself in any way, that they would read it to my friends." When asked directly if he was suicidal that week, Simpson answered simply "Evidently, yes." He later told Brewer on Day 7 that he "wanted to be with Nicole" during the June 17 crisis.
Is there video of the O.J. Simpson civil deposition?
Yes — the full nine-day video deposition of O.J. Simpson, roughly 35.9 hours of footage, is available and synced cue-by-cue to the official court reporter transcript on The Simpson Matter. The video captures moments like Simpson casually promoting his pay-per-view hotline ("That's the phone number: 1-800-OJTELLS") on Day 1 and Robert Baker's exasperated outburst "Am I a potted plant?" on Day 2, when Petrocelli pressed Simpson on drug use past Baker's objections.
O.J. Simpson Deposition • 9 days • 43 videos • 57 key moments
Civil Case
1996
🎞️ OJ Deposition
OJ DEPO
true