Fung's defense-called examination addresses glove damage, sock-collection times and the handling of Simpson's reference blood vial. Separate witnesses describe Simpson during the airport pickup, later at the hotel and on the return flight, with differing opportunities to observe his hands. Fiato's prior criminal-trial testimony reports Vannatter saying Simpson was already a suspect at Rockingham; cross questions the joking context and exact words, while Fiato maintains his account. Petrocelli seeks an admonition over Baker's questions about Fuhrman's notes. The court takes no further action because the objection had been sustained and the matter stricken.

• Line-by-line rulings on objections to Henry Lee's video deposition, covering approximately pages 34–387 of the transcript
• Baker cross-examines Kato Kaelin on timeline and clothing; blocked repeatedly by sustained objections
• Dennis Fung testimony reveals discrepancy: crime scene photos show hole in Bundy glove ring finger absent from booked evidence
• Fung reverses testimony about 'rock embedded in glove finger' during cross-examination, damaging his credibility
• Petrocelli alleges Baker misrepresented Fuhrman's notes by implying reference to dog bite mark on glove when none exists
• Merrill saw no cuts or blood during the airport pickup but was not examining Simpson's hands; Kilduff later saw a bloody bandage at the O'Hare Plaza Hotel, and Partridge described a raw knuckle cut on the return flight.
• Fiato's prior testimony reports Vannatter's statement that Simpson was already a suspect at Rockingham; despite uncertain exact words and questions about joking, Fiato reaffirmed the substance of his account.