📄 Direct examination of Mark Partridge — Wednesday, January 8, 1997
Address:
C:\DEPT103\CIVIL\1997\JAN\8\DIRECT-EXAMINATION-OF-MARK-PAR.DOC
TRIAL
▲ Day 37 of 57

Direct examination of Mark Partridge

Witness: Mark Partridge
Examiner: Daniel Petrocelli
Called by: Plaintiff • Date: Wednesday, January 8, 1997 • Utterances: 310
Chicago trademark attorney Mark Partridge testified via deposition read-in about sitting next to OJ Simpson on an American Airlines flight from Chicago to Los Angeles on June 13, 1994 — the day after the murders. He described Simpson as upset and distraught throughout the flight, observed a raw, jagged cut on the knuckle of Simpson's left middle finger, and recounted Simpson's statements about Nicole's death, his love for her, and that people were blaming him for what happened. On cross, Petrocelli underscored that Partridge was a total stranger with no baseline for Simpson's behavior, and that Simpson himself had raised the subject of being blamed for Nicole's death.
1 A:

Good morning.

2 Q:

Would you state your name, spelling your last name for the record.

3 A:

Mark Partridge, P-a-r-t-r-i-d-g-e.

4 Q:

How are you employed?

5 A:

I'm an attorney.

6 Q:

With what law firm do you work?

7 A:

With the firm of Pattishal, P-a-t-t-i-s-h-a-l, McAuliffe, M-c-A-u-l-i-f-f-e, Newbury, N-e-w-b-u-r-y, Hilliard, H-i-l-l-i-a-r-d, and Geraldson, G-e-r-a-l-d-s-o-n, in Chicago.

8 Q:

How long have you been so employed?

9 A:

Fifteen years.

10 Q:

What type of legal work do you do?

11 A:

I do trademark and copyright law.

12 Q:

In particular within that area of the law, is there any particular subspecialty that you do?

13 A:

Primarily in litigation involving infringement.

14 Q:

In general terms, can you tell me what that involves, litigation, when you say that?

15 A:

Sure. If someone adopts a trademark that is confusingly similar to one of our clients' trademarks, that might result in a lawsuit. Or if there's a trade dress the appearance of a product or a certain style of doing business, that might result in a lawsuit. And also, if there's an infringement of someone's copyright, we may get involved, either as plaintiff or defendant's attorneys in cases like that.

16 Q:

And what in particular do you do with reference to these cases that involve trials, as you put it?

17 A:

Well, I've been with the firm, as I said, 15 years; and I've gone through the whole gambit (sic) of dealing with cases, beginning with the preparation and analyzing cases, filing the complaints, conducting discovery, taking depositions, appearing at trial, presenting witnesses at trial, arguing at trial, arguing appeals, trying to settle.

18 Q:

And as of June 13, 1994, those were the types of activities, in general, that you were engaged in in your profession?

19 A:

Yes, that's correct.

20 Q:

Just give me a little bit of your educational background.

21 A:

I graduated from the University of Nebraska as an undergraduate.

22 Q:

When was that?

23 A:

That was 1978. And then I went to Harvard Law School, and graduated in '81.

24 Q:

Have you been working for your present firm since 1981?

25 A:

Yes.

26 Q:

What is your present position with the firm?

27 A:

A partner with the firm.

28 Q:

As of June 13, 1994, were you a partner with the firm?

29 A:

Yes, I was a partner there.

30 Q:

Directing your attention to the morning of June 13, 1994, did you have to go somewhere that day?

31 A:

Yes. I was traveling to Los Angeles.

32 Q:

And how did you travel to Los Angeles?

33 A:

Airplane. American Airlines.

34 Q:

Do you recall -- do you recall approximately what time the flight left?

35 A:

Yes. I think it was supposed to leave at 9:00 a.m. It did leave approximately then.

36 Q:

And where did you sit on the plane?

37 MR. LEONARD:

I'm sorry. Skipping over to page 9, line 9.

MR. P. BAKER: Got it. (Reading continued.)

38 A:

I was just behind the bulkhead, in coach. It's the first row of coach, where there were two seats, as opposed to three seats, due to an emergency exit. And I was on the right side, next to the emergency exit.

39 Q:

Now, at some point after you entered the plane and sat down, did someone come into the plane and sit next to you?

40 A:

Yes.

41 Q:

Who was that?

42 A:

Mr. Simpson sat next to me.

43 Q:

And when say Mr. Simpson, who are you referring to?

44 A:

O.J. Simpson.

45 Q:

Did you recognize him?

46 A:

Yes. I recognized him when he came down the aisle towards the seat where I was.

47 Q:

When you first saw him come down the aisle towards you, can you describe his demeanor, how he appeared to you?

48 A:

Well, he came on towards -- towards the end of flight. He seemed upset, rushed. There was confusion about which the which seat was his. He seemed upset. I thought he might be upset about that confusion.

49 Q:

In any event, you mentioned something about confusion about a seat. Can you describe that, please.

50 A:

Yes. Two people -- a woman -- was there as well who also had the same seat assignment, 9D, and so they both stood there while the stewardess sorted out who would sit where. And she was sent to a seat a few rows back, and he was given 9D.

51 MR. LEONARD:

Skipping over to page 12, line 8 -- excuse me -- line 7. (Reading continued.)

52 Q:

After Mr. Simpson took his seat, can you describe for me his demeanor?

53 A:

He sighed, looked up, sighed several times.

54 Q:

At this time, did you have any discussion with Mr. Simpson?

55 A:

Not immediately. I didn't have any discussion with him until after the flight took off. But there was discussion at that point between Mr. Simpson and the stewardess.

56 MR. LEONARD:

Over to page 13, line 7. (Reading continued.)

57 Q:

Can you tell me what you overheard?

58 A:

The stewardess said something to the effect, having a bad day, huh, something like that him. And he said, "You don't know the half of it." She didn't quite hear him, and he repeated it.

59 Q:

During that exchange, can you describe Mr. Simpson's demeanor?

60 A:

Well, again, he was sighing. He seemed upset.

61 Q:

At some point, did you have a discussion with Mr. Simpson?

62 A:

Yes, after the flight took off.

63 Q:

Let me just ask you a foundational question. When did you have a discussion with reference to when the flight took off?

64 A:

After the flight took off, and after he made a phone call, then we had our first discussion.

65 Q:

Were you able to overhear the phone call?

66 A:

I could overhear some of the phone call, of course. I couldn't overhear what was on the other line. And I could hear some of what he was saying.

67 Q:

What I meant by my question was, could you overhear what Mr. Simpson was saying?

68 A:

Yes, I could overhear some of what he was saying.

69 Q:

And can you describe Mr. Simpson's demeanor from what you could observe during that telephone conversation he was having?

70 A:

He seemed to me to be, again, upset, like I said, distraught about something.

71 Q:

And after that telephone conversation Mr. Simpson had, you engaged in a discussion with him; is that correct?

72 A:

After the phone call was over, and he had finished, he had leaned back in his chair and again was sighing, and looked up and -- rubbing his face. And I said something about, you know, it must not be a good Monday, or something like that.

73 Q:

After Mr. Simpson made the gesture that you indicated --

74 A:

Yes.

75 Q:

-- what did you say to him, if anything?

76 A:

I said something to the effect of, must be a bad Monday, or something like that.

77 Q:

Did he respond?

78 A:

Yes.

79 Q:

What was his response?

80 A:

He said to me that a friend was dead. That -- that's what I heard. It might have been -- I think he said a close friend, and he might have said, I just found out that a friend was dead.

KEY QUOTE
81 Q:

And how did he appear to you when he made that statement to you?

82 A:

Distraught and upset by the fact.

83 Q:

Now, up to this point, did you notice anything unusual about either of Mr. Simpson's hands?

84 A:

I don't remember by that point if I noticed anything unusual or not.

85 Q:

At some point did you notice anything about Mr. Simpson's hand?

86 A:

Yes. At some point, I noticed that there was a cut on his left hand.

87 Q:

What did you notice about his hand?

88 A:

I noticed that there was a cut on his left hand.

89 Q:

And can you describe what you observed with reference to the cut

90 A:

I saw there was a cut on the knuckle of his middle finger on his left hand. It appeared to be a raw, jagged kind of a cut.

91 Q:

Is there anything else that you noticed with reference to that cut at any point during the flight?

92 A:

Later, during the flight, I noticed that he had wrapped it in a paper towel from the plane restroom. I assumed it was from the plane restroom.

93 Q:

How long did the flight last, approximately?

94 A:

Four hours.

95 Q:

During the flight, did you observe Mr. Simpson drink water?

96 A:

Yes.

97 Q:

How much water -- can you approximate how much water Mr. Simpson drank, either by glass or by any other container that he was using?

98 A:

Yes.

99 Q:

What is that approximation?

100 A:

I know for sure that there was one bottle of Evian water, and he may have had a second. I believe he did have a second.

101 Q:

Did you observe Mr. Simpson leave his seat at any point?

102 A:

Yes. Several times during the flight, he got up and went to the restroom.

103 Q:

You've described a conversation that you had with Mr. Simpson. During the remainder of the flight, did you have any other discussions with Mr. Simpson?

104 A:

Yes. Off and on during the entire flight, he would make a series of phone calls, and then there there's been a opportunity for us -- for us to exchange a few words about the situation.

105 MR. LEONARD:

Lost it. What page are we on.

MR. P. BAKER: We're on 18, line 7. (Reading continued.)

106 Q:

During the times you would exchange words about the situation, can you describe how Mr. Simpson appeared to you?

107 A:

Again, throughout the entire flight, as I said, he seemed upset, distraught by the news that he was reporting to me.

108 Q:

What, if anything, did you notice about Mr. Simpson's appearance when you were having these discussions with him?

109 A:

It was consistent throughout the flight, that from time to time, as he would sit there, either not on the phone or not talking to me, that he would sigh. He would occasionally try and read something, but put it down immediately and sit, rubbed his face, look up -- looked up.

110 Q:

At some point during the flight, did you make any suggestions to Mr. Simpson about what he should do when he returns to Los Angeles?

111 A:

Yes.

112 Q:

And can you describe how that occurred?

113 A:

At about midway through the flight, after he had given me some information about the situation, after I had overheard his conversations on some of the phone calls, I asked him if he planned to have somebody meet him at the airport.

114 Q:

And what was his response?

115 A:

He said that he had not planned to do that.

116 Q:

And was there further discussion at that point?

117 A:

Yes, there was.

118 Q:

And what was that?

119 A:

I said, it seemed to me that there was going to be a lot of media wanting to talk to him and people like that, and that he should have somebody with a clear head help him, because, you know, he seemed tired, confused, and distraught, didn't seem to be in a condition dealing with questions.

120 Q:

Do you have any recollection of whether or not you suggested he should have a lawyer meet him?

121 A:

I think I said a lawyer or somebody like that.

122 Q:

What luggage, if any, did you see in Mr. Simpson's possession that day on the plane?

123 A:

He carried back to his seat a black leather duffel bag or sports bag, and he had a garment bag that he left in first class.

124 Q:

Did you -- did you at any point observe the garment bag?

125 A:

Yes.

126 Q:

When was that?

127 A:

I remember the garment bag when he got off the plane.

128 Q:

Could you describe that for us?

129 A:

It was a Louis Vuitton garment bag, with the LV logo on it.

130 Q:

How did you happen to see that?

131 A:

He got it out of the compartment in first glass class, as he was leaving the plane.

132 MR. LEONARD:

No further questions.

133 MR. PETROCELLI:

Now?

134 THE COURT:

Yeah. (As cross-examination of the witness, selected portions of the transcript were read with Mr. Petrocelli reading the questions, and Mr. P. Baker reading the answers.)

135 MR. PETROCELLI:

Page 82, line 15.

MR. P. BAKER: Okay. (Reading:)

136 Q:

Is it your testimony that you specifically recommended to Mr. Simpson during that flight on June 13, 1994, that he secure counsel for his return to L.

137 A:

on that day?

138 A:

I can't say that I said he should get -- that he should secure counsel.

139 Q:

You didn't specifically recommend that to him, did you? Yes or no?

140 A:

I don't remember. I certainly didn't use those words, and I don't remember -- I might have said a lawyer, somebody.

141 Q:

I'm asking you, did you specifically recommend to Mr. Simpson that he retain an attorney for his return to Los Angeles that day?

142 A:

No, I did not say you should retain an attorney. I said, you should have somebody help you with questions when you get there.

143 Q:

And you never specifically suggested to him that he retain a criminal attorney for his return to Los Angeles that day, did you?

144 A:

No, I did not.

145 MR. PETROCELLI:

Going to page 84, line 9. (Reading continued.)

146 Q:

On the flight from Chicago to Los Angeles on June 13, 1994, would it be fair to say that it was daylight the entire flight that day?

147 A:

Yes, it was.

148 Q:

How would you describe the lighting in the cabin that day?

149 A:

Normal daytime lighting like you find in an office or a house.

150 Q:

Like as we sit in here today?

151 A:

Probably not as bright as in here with the lights and the big windows, but . . .

152 Q:

But certainly bright?

153 A:

A normal office or house light during the day.

154 Q:

So you could clearly see things short dances away from you?

155 A:

Yes.

156 Q:

And you had opportunities to, during that four-hour flight, observe Mr. Simpson's left hand?

157 A:

Yes.

158 Q:

And you could clearly observe some sort of cut on the middle knuckle of the left hand?

159 A:

Yes. There was a cut here on his left hand (indicating).

160 Q:

Can you describe that cut as you saw it?

161 A:

It appeared to me to be raw, kind of jagged.

162 Q:

What about the length of it?

163 A:

Half an inch or less.

164 Q:

You saw Mr. Simpson make several different movements with that left hand, did you not?

165 A:

He used that hand, yes.

166 Q:

And you saw him take something from another passenger and sign an autograph?

167 A:

I saw him take a cocktail napkin, yes.

168 Q:

Indicating with his left hand?

169 A:

I think he held it in his left hand and wrote with his right hand.

170 MR. PETROCELLI:

Turn to page 163.

MR. P. BAKER: Okay.

171 MR. PETROCELLI:

Actually -- excuse me. 158. Sorry. Line 24.

MR. P. BAKER: Okay.

172 MR. LEONARD:

158?

173 MR. PETROCELLI:

You got it?

MR. P. BAKER: Yes. (Reading continued.)

174 Q:

You had never met O.J. Simpson before, correct?

MR. P. BAKER: 158, line what?

175 MR. PETROCELLI:

24. (Reading continued.)

176 A:

That's correct.

177 Q:

Never spoke to him before, correct?

178 A:

That's correct.

179 Q:

Or since, correct?

180 A:

That's correct.

181 Q:

And your observations about his demeanor were based entirely on what you saw in the one -- during the time that you were with him on the flight, correct?

182 A:

Yes.

183 Q:

So when you say he was upset, you had no knowledge from any prior experience with Mr. Simpson as to how he acted when he was upset, correct?

184 A:

Correct.

185 Q:

Or distraught, correct?

186 A:

Correct.

187 Q:

And all of your answers to Mr. Leonard's questions about his demeanor, were . . . how you would interpret what might be normal human behavior, correct?

188 A:

Correct.

189 Q:

You were a total stranger to him, correct?

190 A:

Yes.

191 Q:

And yet he told you about his personal feelings towards Nicole, didn't he? He expressed to you his personal feelings about Nicole, correct?

192 A:

Yes.

193 Q:

And he told you that he loved Nicole, right?

194 A:

Yes.

195 Q:

And he told you that they had gotten divorced some two years ago, true?

196 A:

Yes.

197 Q:

And he told you that they had been together for some 17 years, true?

198 A:

Yes.

199 Q:

And he told you that Nicole was a close friend, true?

200 A:

Yes.

201 Q:

And he told you that he had a girlfriend, true?

202 A:

Yes.

203 Q:

And he told you that this girlfriend did not understand his feelings for his ex-wife, Nicole, true?

204 A:

Yes.

205 Q:

He told you that even though he had -- he told you that he and Nicole were not together anymore, true?

206 A:

Yes.

207 Q:

And he told you that even so, he loved Nicole, true?

208 A:

Yes.

209 Q:

And that she was still a good friend, true?

210 A:

Yes.

211 Q:

And a great mother?

212 A:

Yes.

213 Q:

You indicated in response to Mr. Leonard's questions that Mr. Simpson sighed a couple of times. Do you recall that?

214 A:

Yes.

215 Q:

I think you said he put his hands -- his face in his hands once?

216 A:

He put his face like that or his hands like that (indicating).

217 Q:

And those gestures that you just described for the camera and testified to previously were obvious to you, correct?

218 A:

Yes.

219 Q:

They were clearly visible to you, correct?

220 A:

Yes.

221 Q:

Mr. Simpson also told you that he was being blamed for Nicole's death, wasn't he?

222 A:

He mentioned that, yes, that some people were blaming him.

223 Q:

For Nicole's death?

224 A:

Yes.

225 Q:

So when he said to you -- so when he said that to you, you understood that here is a man, O.J. Simpson, sitting next to you, who some people were claiming had just killed his ex-wife, Nicole. True?

226 A:

Those things added up during the course of the flight, yes.

KEY QUOTE
227 Q:

They added up in your thought process, correct?

228 A:

When he first told me that there were some people were blaming him, I didn't know that Nicole had been killed. But during the course of the flight, that was explained, yes.

229 Q:

So by the end of the conversation you had with O.J. Simpson, he had communicated to you that some people were accusing him of killing his ex-wife, Nicole, true?

230 A:

It was in the context of people were blaming him for what had happened, yes.

231 Q:

True, what I just asked you?

232 A:

I didn't know that they were accusing him of doing the crime. What he had said is, they were blaming me. And my first impression was that he was being blamed somehow for what had happened. But I didn't know in what capacity he was being blamed.

233 Q:

But by the end of the conversation, you understood that he had communicated to you that he was being blamed for the death of Nicole, correct?

234 A:

Somehow he was being blamed for that, yes.

235 MR. PETROCELLI:

Skip over to page 167, line 20 --

MR. P. BAKER: Okay.

236 MR. PETROCELLI:

-- referring to telephone calls on the plane. (ReadingReading continued.)

237 Q:

Now, the first call he made, even before you began to converse with him, was to someone named Skip, right?

238 A:

Yes.

239 Q:

And you later on understood that to be Skip Taft, right?

240 A:

I assume it was Skip Taft.

241 Q:

A lawyer and friend of Mr. Simpson's, right?

242 A:

I understand he is a lawyer and a friend, yes.

243 MR. PETROCELLI:

Now skip down to page 169, line 16. Got it?

MR. P. BAKER: Yep.

244 MR. LEONARD:

Which line?

245 MR. PETROCELLI:

16. (Reading continued.)

246 Q:

And, in fact, in the very first phone call, before you even spoke to Mr. Simpson, you heard Mr. Simpson say to Skip, quote, "I can't talk now," end quotes. True?

247 A:

Yes, that's true.

248 MR. PETROCELLI:

Page 171, line 11.

MR. P. BAKER: Okay. (Reading continued.)

249 Q:

Mr. Simpson asked you if you were a lawyer, correct?

250 A:

Yes.

251 Q:

Did he ask you if you were any particular type of lawyer?

252 A:

No.

253 Q:

And did you tell him?

254 A:

At the end of the flight, I told him that I didn't do this kind of thing.

255 Q:

What exactly did you say, I don't practice criminal law?

256 A:

Yeah.

257 Q:

You're looking at your notes now?

258 A:

Yes. I'm trying to refresh my recollection here on what was (sic) said. I don't think I said criminal lawyer; I just think I said that I am -- that if he needed to get in touch with me, not as a lawyer, because I don't do that kind of thing, here's how he can get in touch with me.

259 Q:

Well, you just testified that you told him, I don't do this kind of thing. Okay?

260 A:

I don't do this kind of thing; right.

261 Q:

And by "this kind of thing," you meant you don't practice criminal defense, correct?

262 A:

That's what I meant, yes.

263 Q:

That's what you meant?

264 A:

That's what I meant. I don't think I used the word "criminal," but I meant that.

265 Q:

You just said in lieu of saying I don't do criminal defense work, you said to him I don't do this kind of thing?

266 A:

Right. Exactly.

267 Q:

You did not ask Mr. Simpson when he last saw Nicole prior to her death?

268 A:

No, I didn't ask him that.

269 Q:

You didn't ask Mr. Simpson where he was during the time of her death?

270 A:

The only thing I asked in that regard was where he was coming from, and he said Chicago. So I assumed he was in Chicago at the time of the death.

271 Q:

Did you ask him, Mr. Simpson, where were you when Nicole was killed?

272 A:

I didn't ask him where he was.

273 Q:

And he didn't tell you?

274 A:

No.

275 Q:

You only asked where he was coming from, and he said Chicago?

276 A:

Yes.

277 Q:

Was this in the context of discussing Nicole's death?

278 A:

That she had been killed the night before, yes.

279 Q:

So let me understand the sequence here. Mr. Simpson said to you that Nicole had been killed the night before, correct?

280 A:

Sunday night, yes.

281 Q:

And you said, where are you coming from?

282 A:

Not A, B, C, not right away. But eventually during the flight, I did ask him where he was coming from, yes.

283 Q:

Okay.

284 MR. PETROCELLI:

Page 181, line 22.

MR. P. BAKER: Okay. (Reading continued.)

285 Q:

You made a reference in your notes to Kato?

286 A:

Yes.

287 Q:

Now, that's a name that you had never heard of before you were on this flight with Mr. Simpson, right?

288 A:

That's right.

289 Q:

So Mr. Simpson talked to you about Kato Kaelin, right?

290 A:

No. He said that on the phone. He didn't say those words to me; those are words I overheard him saying.

291 MR. PETROCELLI:

That's it, Your Honor.

292 MR. LEONARD:

I don't have anything further.

293

THE COURT: Ten-minute recess, ladies and gentlemen. Don't talk about the case; don't form or express any opinion. (Recess.) (The following proceedings were held in open court outside the presence of the jury.)

294 THE COURT:

For the record, the petition filed by Henry Johnson is denied.

295 MR. PETROCELLI:

Thank you, Your Honor.

296 MR. BAKER:

Your Honor, we think that this ought to be received and this man out to be testifying.

297 THE COURT:

You can always retain him.

298 MR. PETROCELLI:

And pay him, too. Yes, on the --

299 MR. MEDVENE:

If the Court please, the defense is going to read in tomorrow the testimony of Mr. Siglar who works at the coroner's office. I've met with Mr. Loenard and gone over the objections. It's our thought that matters can proceed a lot more quickly if you have an opportunity maybe early in the morning to take a look at two exhibits, and that's where most of our -- most of our objections go to those two exhibits. One is a letter to Mr. Hodgeman. Another is a handwritten note of alleged coroner's office deficiencies. We'll make the argument tomorrow. The argument on the defense side is it's relevant re: The coroner's office and deficiencies. The argument on our side, in substance, will be unless they can tie the deficiencies into some argument in this case, it's not relevant. That will be 80 percent of the objections tomorrow. I think we can get the objections out of the way in about 10 minutes. You'll have a copy of the transcript, but we thought if we could meet with you early tomorrow, and if you just, when you had a chance, took a look at two exhibits Mr. Leonard is going to flag for you, it will give you a flavor for it.

300 THE COURT:

Okay.

301 MR. LEONARD:

May I hand them up to the clerk? They're -- this is a volume of exhibits from Volumes 2 and 3 of the deposition and the two post-its are where the two --

302 MR. MEDVENE:

Okay. Thank you.

303 MR. BAKER:

Then, Your Honor, we wanted to play a video, and this video is of India Allen. India Allen was the lady who came in here and --

304 THE COURT:

I remember her.

305 MR. BAKER:

She, after she got off the stand, like virtually everyone else, felt compelled to go on some television shows and testify or -- or gave -- said on national television that in fact she had viewed this incident and she went in and said to Dr. Shipp, the fellow who employed her, told him about the incident, and rather than calling the police or anything like that, he said oh, it happens all the time, words to that effect. Dr. Shipp is in the hall, he is not going to say that that occurred. At least that's what he indicated to us. And to set this up, that is her misrepresentation, we want to play the video before the jury. And we can prove up if necessary. I don't think they'll argue that it is not the video of what she -- of her, and on television. And I would suggest that this is no more -- no more or less. This is more authentic than the 30 photos or 20 photos or however the number was that the plaintiffs sprung on us on Monday. And this is -- in fact, it's self-authenticating because you can see India Allen and you can hear her voice and she relates to this -- whoever's talking to her about this incident.

306 MR. LEONARD:

Just one more point, Your Honor.

307 MR. PETROCELLI:

The Flammer photos are self-authenticating.

308 THE COURT:

Wait a minute. Let's stick with this.

309 MR. LEONARD:

This is an inconsistent statement in two respects: One, I don't know if you recall, Mrs. Allen protested that she had no desire to get in the limelight, she didn't want to, you know, she was hesitant to come forward initially, she didn't want to be in the limelight. So this -- obviously her actions, going on two different national television programs virtually -- I think one was the next day and one was a day after that, her testimony certainly is inconsistent with that and goes directly to her credibility. Secondly, and most importantly, she said in her testimony, and it's at page 44, she was asked a question. (Reading:)

310 Q:

How many times have you told this story, that is this alleged incident with Mr. Simpson that you always get mixed up?

Temperature

tense

Key Quotes (5)

O.J. Simpson
You don't know the half of it.
Simpson's first words on the flight, said to a flight attendant who asked if he was having a bad day — establishes his emotional state hours after the murders
Mark Partridge
I noticed that there was a cut on the knuckle of his middle finger on his left hand. It appeared to be a raw, jagged kind of a cut.
Key physical evidence corroborating the wound on Simpson's left hand observed by others; Partridge estimated it at half an inch or less
Mark Partridge
He said to me that a friend was dead. That -- that's what I heard. It might have been -- I think he said a close friend, and he might have said, I just found out that a friend was dead.
Simpson's first disclosure to Partridge, framing Nicole as 'a close friend' rather than his ex-wife
Mark Partridge
Those things added up during the course of the flight, yes.
Partridge's admission that by flight's end he understood Simpson was being accused of killing Nicole — making Simpson's openness with a stranger all the more notable
O.J. Simpson
I can't talk now.
First words overheard on a call to his lawyer Skip Taft, before Partridge even spoke to him — Petrocelli used this to suggest Simpson was already managing communications strategically

Evidence (4)

Informal
Raw, jagged cut on the knuckle of Simpson's left middle finger, approximately half an inch or less, later wrapped in a paper towel
described by eyewitness testimony
Informal
Louis Vuitton garment bag left by Simpson in first class
described by eyewitness testimony
Informal
Black leather duffel/sports bag carried by Simpson to his seat
described by eyewitness testimony
Informal
Video of India Allen's post-trial television appearances (raised in sidebar after testimony concluded)
Baker sought to play before jury to impeach Allen's prior testimony; ruling deferred

Notable Exchanges (4)

Daniel PetrocelliMark Partridge
Petrocelli methodically extracted that Partridge had no prior knowledge of Simpson, no baseline for his behavior, and that all demeanor observations were interpretations of 'normal human behavior' from a total stranger — undercutting the weight of the demeanor testimony.
strategic
Daniel PetrocelliMark Partridge
Petrocelli walked through everything Simpson voluntarily disclosed to a stranger during the flight: that he loved Nicole, they had been together 17 years, she was a great mother, he had a girlfriend who didn't understand his feelings for Nicole, and that people were blaming him for her death.
revealing
Daniel PetrocelliMark Partridge
Petrocelli confirmed that Partridge never asked Simpson where he was when Nicole was killed, and Simpson never volunteered it — only that he was coming from Chicago.
strategic
Robert BakerJudge Fujisaki
After testimony, Baker argued to admit a video of India Allen's national television appearances as impeachment of her trial testimony that she hadn't sought the limelight; Petrocelli objected, comparing it unfavorably to the Flammer photos.
heated

Light Moments (1)

Daniel Petrocelli
After Baker argued Partridge should testify live, Petrocelli quipped 'And pay him, too' — a jab at the defense's suggestion that plaintiffs should have called the witness themselves.

Credibility Attacks (2)

⚔ Mark Partridge
lack of baseline / stranger bias
Petrocelli established that Partridge had never met Simpson before, had no prior knowledge of his personality or emotional patterns, and therefore all demeanor characterizations were subjective interpretations of behavior in a stranger — not informed assessments of whether Simpson was acting unusually
⚔ India Allen
prior inconsistent statement via television appearance
Baker raised post-trial TV appearances by Allen contradicting her in-court testimony that she hadn't wanted attention or the limelight; Baker sought to play the video before the jury as impeachment

Witness Demeanor

Witness paused to consult notes to refresh recollection about exact wording of conversation with Simpson
Witness physically demonstrated Simpson's gestures (hands to face, looking upward) for the camera during deposition

Objections

None recorded
Proceeding 8763 • 310 utterances • Plaintiff witness
Civil Trial
Department 103
⚖️ Start
📂 JAN 8, 1997 📄 Direct examination of Mark Par
JAN 8, 1997 KRT DvH TD