All right. Back on the record in the Simpson matter. All parties are again present. Mr. Simpson is present with his counsel, Mr. Shapiro, Mr. Cochran, Mr. Scheck, Mr. Blasier, People represented by Mr. Darden, Mr. Goldberg, Ms. Clark. The jury is not present. The record should reflect that this morning, the Court had a conference with counsel in chambers concerning certain demonstrative evidence items prepared by the Prosecution. The first was the "LAPD Additional Evidence Disposition" which has been previously marked as People's 209. The Court will allow the use without commentary regarding what was done with the items represented, which are the substrate controls, while they were in the possession of the Defense and made available at that time for their examination. There is a second board that is entitled "Defense Testing," and I'm sustaining the Defense objection to the title of that board. And for simplicity purposes, Mr. Goldberg, I would suggest at this point that we mark that as People's 210. Is that agreeable to the People?
And I'm going to direct Mr. Fairtlough to cover the title of the board as "Defense testing" since at this point, it's not appropriate to comment on whether or not any testing has been accomplished or done by the Defense.
KEY QUOTEYour Honor, is the Court going to have that stipulation prepared or will we be able to ask Mr. Matheson whether these items were turned over in October of last year?
You'll be able to ask him if those items were turned over and that they were returned at some point in time, and that's it.
KEY QUOTEI believe you used the word "Examination" and in chambers, you used the word "Inspection."
All right. And Mr. Matheson is here and, Mr. Goldberg, you can consult with him on that. All right. As to a third board that was shown to the Court which has various depictions of item 13, the socks, the Court will sustain the Defense objection at this time to the board itself. However, the photograph of the single sock, the objection is overruled. All right. Anything else we need to put on the record before we invite the jurors to rejoin us?
I'm going to direct Mr. Fairtlough to cover the title of the board as 'Defense testing' since at this point, it's not appropriate to comment on whether or not any testing has been accomplished or done by the Defense.
I believe you used the word 'Examination' and in chambers, you used the word 'Inspection.'
You'll be able to ask him if those items were turned over and that they were returned at some point in time, and that's it.