My objection is that the Court recalls that we said that--you know, dancing around with all this stuff. I just don't see that as being that important, and if they are going to make some measurements, let them do it in front of the jury but why is Bell relevant? It is a relevance objection. And if he wants to do that, that is fine, but I'm just saying that we object. I mean, Mr. Simpson has a right to go over and happy to describe it.
All right. All he is showing is measuring techniques here. He can shown it on Miss Clark if he wants.
KEY QUOTEI expect you to do the same thing with Mr. Simpson, but it is relevant, so the objection is overruled.
Mr. Simpson has a right to go over and happy to describe it.
All he is showing is measuring techniques here. He can shown it on Miss Clark if he wants.
She has little gloves.
I'll submit it. I'm extra small. It is ridiculous.