tense The defense launched a comprehensive closing argument led by Robert Blasier, systematically attacking the plaintiff's physical and DNA evidence, challenging LAPD procedures, and highlighting inconsistencies in witness testimony about a 'missing blood' vial. Defense attorney Leonard concluded by attacking the credibility of paid expert witnesses. The case was extended to Monday as closing arguments ran longer than initially scheduled.
- Scheduling dispute between defense and judge; case extended to Monday over closing argument timeline
- Blasier begins defense closing, attacking physical evidence for contamination, tampering, and planting
- Defense argues RFLP DNA methodology and FBI population database are fundamentally unreliable
- Missing blood theory emerges: nurse changed sworn testimony about amount originally drawn from Simpson
- Blasier suggests timeline of killings is longer than plaintiff claimed, implying possible multiple perpetrators
- Leonard attacks credibility of paid expert witnesses, displaying their hourly rate schedules to jury