Closing arguments dominated the day, with plaintiff's counsel Petrocelli, Kelly, and Brewer methodically presenting the case that Simpson harbored intense rage toward Nicole Brown Simpson, was caught in multiple lies—particularly about owning Bruno Magli shoes—and that Nicole herself documented her fear of him. The defense, through Baker, countered by attacking the evidence as tainted by police misconduct and framing the case as a conspiracy. The jury heard Nicole's own voice on a 1993 911 tape and her diary entries about the 1989 beating, evidence the plaintiffs argued directly undermined Simpson's claims he could never harm her.

• Petrocelli walks jury through chain of evidence to argue that Simpson was enraged on June 12, 1994
• Petrocelli argues that photographs contradict Simpson's deposition denial of ever owning Bruno Magli shoes
• Nicole's diary (Exhibit 732A) and 1989 New Year's Day beating evidence presented to rebut Simpson's testimony
• Nicole's recorded voice from 1993 911 tape played in court to establish her fear
• Court sustains objections to listing Mark Fuhrman as a missing witness and to putting the gloves on Simpson during closing argument
• Defense counsel Baker delivers opening closing argument attacking plaintiffs' evidence as tainted by police conspiracy
• Defense closing touches on Simpson's behavior after learning of the murder, framing his actions as consistent with innocence