📄 Cross-examination of Werner Spitz (part 3) (2 of 2) — Tuesday, November 12, 1996
Address:
C:\DEPT103\CIVIL\1996\NOV\12\CROSS-EXAMINATION-OF-WERNER-SP.DOC
TRIAL
▲ Day 13 of 57

Cross-examination of Werner Spitz (part 3) (2 of 2)

Witness: Dr. Werner Spitz
Examiner: Edward Medvene
Called by: Defense • Date: Tuesday, November 12, 1996 • Utterances: 4
Plaintiff's counsel asked a single follow-up question to Dr. Spitz clarifying that the jaw injury could have been caused by either hand, not just the right. The witness confirmed the blow was consistent with coming from the left hand.
1 MR. MEDVENE:

Just one question, Your Honor.

FURTHER REDIRECT EXAMINATION BY MR. MEDVENE:

2 Q:

You were asked a question if the blow to the jaw was consistent with coming from the right hand.

Is it also consistent with it coming from the left hand?

3 A:

It is coming from -- it is consistent as coming with the left hand; absolutely.

KEY QUOTE
4 MR. MEDVENE:

Nothing further, Your Honor.

Temperature

procedural

Key Quotes (1)

Dr. Spitz
It is coming from -- it is consistent as coming with the left hand; absolutely.
Expands the range of possible perpetrator mechanics, countering any defense argument that only a right-handed blow was consistent with the injury.

Objections

None recorded
Proceeding 8230 • 4 utterances • Defense witness
Civil Trial
Department 103
⚖️ Start
📂 NOV 12, 1996 📄 Cross-examination of Werner Sp
NOV 12, 1996 KRT DvH TD