Detailed entries (19)
Crime-scene photograph, presented under People's 55 and alternate civil and defense exhibit references, showing Detective Mark Fuhrman pointing toward the Bundy glove and knit cap beneath foliage, with nearby paper or envelope material also visible. Witnesses and counsel disputed whether the photograph was made before dawn or after Fuhrman's return from Rockingham, and questioning used it to challenge scene-handling and collection practices.
Defense 1366, an enlarged contact sheet of approximately 35–36 photographs from Rolf Rokahr's first roll of film at Bundy. It includes a first-frame slate and Fuhrman-and-glove images in frames 34–35; counsel disputed what the sequence established about timing, while Rokahr testified that the sheet did not show the elapsed time between photographs.
Photograph of the Bundy glove with identification card 102 beside it before collection, identified as Civil Exhibit 101 and also presented as People's 457 and Defense 1328. Dennis Fung testified that the glove appeared relatively similar in position when compared with Exhibit 40; the court sustained a question asserting alteration.
People's 56-G shows the Bundy glove under foliage with Goldman's shoe or boot nearly touching it. Sources associate People's 56-H with the same area after a change in the glove's depicted orientation, identification card 102, and a partly hidden cap; the exhibit number assigned to the second image was disputed during related testimony. Defense counsel used the photographs to argue that the relative positions had changed.
Photograph labeled 102 showing the hat under leaves as it appeared on June 13; displayed during Detective Lange's civil-trial testimony.
Close-up photographs of the Bundy right-hand glove's ring-finger area shown to Dennis Fung. Counsel alleged that an image depicted a hole or tear absent from the glove in court; Fung later confined his damage description to the photograph, while Lambert argued that the apparent defect was debris lying on the glove and that a wider-angle image had affected Fung's interpretation.
Defendants' 40, a Bundy crime-scene photograph showing a person pointing toward a glove, with a nearby post and the knit cap partially beneath the fence's lower horizontal rung. It was used during questioning about the cap's position and possible uncollected imprint evidence on the post.
Exhibit 89 is a close-up photograph of the glove and hat taken on June 13, 1994. Officer Terrazas confirmed that it showed approximately where he had seen the glove.
People's 180 is a still photograph taken after the videotape segment, showing the glove and leafy clump in the same location as in People's 179. It was also described as a photograph without the card, documenting the scene before Fung placed the card.
People's 44 shows a glove on soil beneath a plant near Goldman's body, with his shoe visible and no number tag described. It was later used to contrast actual crime-scene conditions with experimental conditions.
Civil defense photograph (Defendants' 89) of the knit cap at the Bundy crime scene; defense counsel Baker used it to question Detective Lange about particulate matter and dirt transfer on the cap.
Photo 40 shows the glove and hat as Officer Riske said they appeared when he first arrived at approximately 12:13 a.m. on June 13. It was displayed for identification and comparison.
Exhibits 2372-2373, described as close-up photographs of a stained glove label and the back of a glove with debris on the ring finger. Lambert discussed them with Gregory Matheson to address glove identity and rebut a cutting-or-tearing suggestion.
Defendant's 1040 shows the glove location and a blue object on the other side of the fence. Lange testified that he had not observed blood in the walkway, was unaware of blood on the fence, and did not believe the reports showed blood droplets.
Exhibit 1327 was shown as depicting the glove in a different position. Plaintiff counsel represented at sidebar that it was taken after the bodies were moved and after 9 a.m.; the court sustained an objection for lack of foundation.
Crime scene photograph (P-59) discussed during Sergeant Rossi's testimony; the public feed was cut, and the source describes the image as likely showing a glove-and-cap area.
Photograph (People's 193) of a glove area showing a bloody area with leaves; introduced and discussed during Dennis Fung's testimony.
Crime scene photograph (People's 69) showing a glove on pavement with leaves and overhanging trees; used during Professor MacDonell's testimony to contrast crime-scene conditions with experimental conditions.
References to crime-scene photographs described as showing the envelope or glove in different positions, including images made before and after body removal. Ragle said the photographs alone did not establish how the items moved or who moved them, and another examination discussed movement only hypothetically.