Glove Cap in Situ Photos

Photographs of the south walkway and narrow path at 360 North Rockingham Avenue showing the brown leather glove in its original location behind Kato Kaelin's guest room near the air conditioning unit, June 13, 1994. Presented as multi-photo boards (People's 68 with sub-exhibit 68-C, People's 116), individual photo sets (People's P-36 through P-38), and preliminary hearing exhibits (People's 9, People's 21), and civil board (Defendants' 145).

Multi-part prosecution photo chart (People's 54, subparts 1–4) containing close-up photographs of the Bundy crime scene including the envelope, the right-hand glove and knit cap, Nicole Brown Simpson, and a black shoe adjacent to the plant near the cap and glove in blood-stained grouting. Sub-exhibits 54-A, 54(2), and 54(3) were introduced and referenced individually during testimony.

Photograph(s) of Detective Mark Fuhrman kneeling and pointing at the right-hand leather glove and knit cap under foliage at 875 South Bundy, taken during the early morning of June 13, 1994 by news photographer Rokahr. The timing of the photograph — disputed as before sunrise (~4–5 AM) versus after 7 AM as Fuhrman testified — was a central issue in the defense's evidence-planting argument.

Photographer Jamie Rokahr's contact sheet and individual frames from his first roll of film shot at the Bundy crime scene on June 13, 1994, comprising approximately 35–36 frames. Frame 1 shows the photographer's C-form slate with a call time of 2:48 AM; frames 34–35 show Detective Fuhrman pointing at the glove in apparent darkness. The contact sheet was central to the defense argument that the Fuhrman pointing photograph was taken before the 5:41 AM sunrise, contradicting Fuhrman's 7 AM testimony.

Defense exhibits comprising an overall photograph of Detective Fuhrman pointing toward the envelope at the Bundy crime scene (Defense 1055), a companion photograph of Fuhrman pointing toward the envelope (Defense 1079), and a side-by-side composite (Defense 1080) demonstrating the envelope in two different positions relative to the tile lines; used during Fung's cross-examination to show the envelope appeared to have moved between photographs.

Defense photographs (1076, 1077, and 1109) showing evidence identification cards and the Bundy envelope in differing positions across the photo record; offered to rebut the prosecution's argument for a consistent chronological card-placement sequence and to establish that the positions of both the card and envelope changed during the evidence-documentation process.

Paired crime scene photographs (People's 56-G and 56-H) of the right-hand leather glove and knit cap under foliage at 875 South Bundy, showing the items in two different orientations — one with the glove fingers pointing toward Goldman's tennis shoe, the other with the glove and cap in a repositioned arrangement. Also includes close-ups showing the glove alongside evidence identification card no. 102. Used by both prosecution and defense to address alleged movement of evidence.

Wider-perspective crime scene photograph (People's 58) of the Bundy glove and cap area taken after Ron Goldman's body had been removed, with a printed close-up (People's 58-A) derived from the same frame. Introduced during Officer Riske's testimony to contextualize the change in the glove's apparent position relative to photographs taken while the body was still present.

Civil trial photograph (Exhibit 102) showing the knit cap under leaves at the Bundy crime scene as it appeared on June 13, 1994; displayed during Detective Lange's testimony regarding the cap's condition and the defense argument over the timing of evidence photographs.

Crime scene photograph (People's 44) showing the right-hand leather glove on soil beneath a plant at 875 South Bundy with Ron Goldman's shoe visible and his body still in place; no evidence identification number tag present. Used during testimony to establish the glove's original position before body removal and to contrast blood and soil conditions with later experimental photographs.

Close-up photograph of the right-hand glove and knit cap under foliage at the Bundy crime scene, taken June 13, 1994; stipulated and introduced in the civil trial through Officer Terrazas, who confirmed it showed approximately where he observed the glove.

Still photograph (People's 180) of the Bundy right-hand glove and leafy clump in the same position as People's 179, taken after the videotape segment recorded by the criminalists; used to establish chronological sequence and the original glove position prior to Fung placing evidence card no. 103.

Close-up civil trial photographs of the right-hand leather glove at the Bundy crime scene; defense counsel Lambert argued one photograph showed a tear in the glove, while plaintiff's counsel argued the apparent 'tear' was an object resting on top of the glove and that Fung had been misled by a wider-angle photograph.

Civil defense photograph (Defendants' 89) of the knit cap at the Bundy crime scene; defense counsel Baker used it to question Detective Lange about particulate matter and dirt transfer on the cap.

Civil trial photograph (Exhibit 101) of the right-hand glove location at the Bundy crime scene; introduced and identified by Officer Terrazas during his civil trial examination.

Civil trial photograph (Exhibit 1327) showing the right-hand glove at the Bundy crime scene in a position different from earlier photographs, representing the scene after the bodies were moved (post-9 AM per plaintiff counsel's sidebar representation); objection sustained for lack of foundation.

Photograph (Photo 40, civil trial) of the right-hand leather glove and knit cap as they appeared at the Bundy crime scene when Officer Riske first arrived at approximately 12:13 a.m. on June 13, 1994; displayed for comparison against later photographs showing a change in glove position.

Criminal trial photograph (Defendant's 1040) showing the right-hand glove location at the Bundy crime scene and a blue object visible on the other side of the fence; Detective Lange confirmed upon cross-examination that there was no blood near the glove area.

Crime scene photograph (P-59) discussed during Sergeant Rossi's testimony in the criminal trial; the public broadcast feed was cut during display, likely depicting the Bundy glove and cap area.

Still photograph (People's 179) of the Bundy right-hand glove area taken before criminalist Dennis Fung placed evidence identification card no. 103 at the location; used during testimony to establish a chronological sequence of the evidence documentation.

Still photograph (People's 192-A) of the Bundy right-hand glove area introduced during Dennis Fung's testimony in the criminal trial.

Photograph (People's 193) of the right-hand glove area at the Bundy crime scene showing a bloody area with leaves; introduced and discussed during Dennis Fung's testimony.

Glove photo board (People's 272-B) displayed to the jury during the testimony of Ms. Montgomery in the criminal trial.

Crime scene photograph (People's 69) showing the right-hand leather glove at the Bundy crime scene on pavement with leaves and overhanging trees; used during Professor MacDonnell's testimony in the criminal trial to contrast crime scene conditions with experimental conditions.

General references to crime scene photographs documenting the Bundy envelope and right-hand leather glove appearing in different positions between successive photographs, cited as evidence of possible evidence movement; discussed without assignment to specific exhibit numbers during testimony and defense closing arguments.

General references to the knit cap and right-hand leather glove found together near Ron Goldman's feet beside a bush at the gate enclosure of 875 South Bundy; discussed as crime scene evidence without citation to a specific photograph exhibit number, and in context of poor lighting conditions at the scene.

Footage and still frames from a videotape recorded inside the Rockingham residence showing a glove on a table near a photograph of a young woman, timestamped approximately 2:50 PM; witnesses including Mr. Ford and Detective Luper confirmed seeing the glove on the video, and testimony addressed whether it had been placed there or was pre-existing.