Bundy Shoeprint Photos Casts

The “Shoe Prints at Bundy, June 13, 1994” board, containing 15 photographs of impressions along the walkway, stairs, landing, and route toward the rear alley. It was identified in the criminal trial as People's 45 A–O and in the civil trial as Plaintiffs' 41/43; documented constituent exhibits include People's 45-B and Plaintiffs' 2206–2209, depicting the first steps, impression A, and Q67 and Q68 near the front gate and envelope. Bodziak described Q67 and Q68 as left-heel impressions matching a European size 46 Bruno Magli heel, while noting Q67's heavy indistinction.

Photographs of Bundy shoe impressions included People's 390-A through 390-P and additional exhibits depicting impressions S, X, Y, Q116, and an unlettered item. Bodziak identified several as size 46 Silga impressions, but found insufficient identifying detail in People's 390-P; People's 395 showed two very faint shoeprints without a scale.

People's 598, a board of overall and close-up Bundy walkway shoeprint photographs labeled A through K. It included panel H, a June 13 black-and-white close-up, and blow-ups labeled A, B, C, J, and K prepared by Bodziak from original negatives received in August; during cross-examination, Scheck characterized those blow-ups as higher quality and prepared in anticipation of rebutting Lee's testimony. Duplicate panels D, E, and G were withdrawn.

Individual comparison charts for each identified bloody shoe print at Bundy (impressions A through J, L, M, N, O, S, X, Y, Q68, and Q116), introduced in the civil trial as Plaintiffs' 412A through O and 413–416. Companion overlays were admitted by reference to criminal case BA097211.

Photographs showing evidence item 112 — a bloody shoeprint with a blood drop to its left — taken at the Bundy crime scene. Introduced as People's 48-A and 48-B; used by Detective Lange to discuss blood drop and shoeprint locations pointing toward the building.

Defense 1337-A through 1337-C included blow-ups and an LAPD crime-scene photograph showing a parallel-line imprint on the Bundy walkway. Dr. Lee identified the imprint as a shoeprint; during later questioning he disavowed authorship of the broader Defense 1337 footprint board and questioned its tile placement. The civil exhibit Defense Exhibit 1337A was discussed as a version with a sock outline drawn.

Three magnetized photographs of the Bundy walk showing the tile area at three positions — furthest up the walk, the middle, and furthest east toward Nicole's body — introduced during Dr. Lee's testimony as People's 599-A, B, and C.

Civil Exhibit 408, a Bundy crime-scene walkway diagram or display showing the property layout, body positions, and documented footwear impressions with pink or red, purple, and blue markings. It was used to orient witnesses and map impressions; Bodziak described the blue-marked areas as indeterminate for insufficient design detail, while questioning challenged the unidentified impressions and apparent gaps near Nicole's body.

Civil defense photograph identified as Defendants' 2257, also referenced with number 717, showing a disputed mark in blood on the Bundy walkway about four feet from Nicole's body. Baker characterized the mark as a shoeprint, and Dr. Baden testified that a print in the congealed blood indicated movement at least three to five minutes after bleeding stopped.

A two-panel board showing an aerial layout of the Bundy crime scene with color-coded shoeprint locations: purple for right foot, pink/red for left foot, and blue for indistinct impressions. Introduced in the criminal trial as People's 387-A and 387-B and used by Bodziak to orient all subsequent photograph comparisons.

Defendants' 2214 comprised civil-trial photographs of the Bundy walkway, including an image of a possible partial shoeprint and another showing shoeprints closer to the body. The photographs were discussed separately with Detective Lange and Dr. Michael Baden; Baden described one image as consistent with a shoeprint outside the gate.

A chart titled 'Footwear Impressions After Stepping in Liquid' showing an artist rendering and Bodziak's test impressions demonstrating how bloody shoe prints fade over successive steps; includes test impressions made with the Bruno Magli Lorenzo shoe and latex paint. Introduced in the criminal trial as People's 386 and in the civil trial as Plaintiffs' 407.

A new board of Bundy walkway photographs introduced during Bodziak's rebuttal testimony in September 1995, People's 623-A through G, including oblique-lit black-and-white photos, color photos of shoeprints, a shoe impression made in wet concrete, and a photo showing tile with permanent concrete finishing marks.

Plaintiffs' 44–56, a civil-trial series documenting bloody shoeprints along the Bundy walkway and stairwells from the front steps toward the rear alley. Exhibit 49 was referenced as a crime-scene shoeprint comparison photograph during Bodziak's testimony.

Proceeding references to photographs showing blood and shoeprints at Bundy. Bodziak described shoeprint photographs as adequate for comparison and as documenting the prints before police foot traffic; Baker displayed a photograph while arguing that additional unidentified impressions were present.

A civil defense photograph (Defendants' Exhibit 2215) showing a possible shoe impression approximately five feet from Nicole Brown Simpson's neck, marked and displayed during Bodziak's testimony. Bodziak acknowledged the impression could be consistent with a Silga sole but stated he had never formally examined it.

Crime scene photographs (Exhibit 43) shown to Bodziak in the civil trial depicting possible but unclear footwear impressions at the Bundy scene; Bodziak explained he could not make objective comparisons from these photographs.

A civil trial crime scene photograph (Exhibit 92) displayed during Detective Lange's testimony; Lange identified a partial heel print in the upper left quadrant of the image.

A photograph identified during Lambert's closing argument as a size 12 Bruno Magli shoeprint from Bundy and displayed as Item 56 in support of counsel's argument against a planting theory.

A preliminary-hearing photograph, numbered 104 and admitted as People's 10, showing a white envelope with prescription glasses and a bloody shoeprint pattern.

A magnetized board displaying crime scene photographs taken June 13, 1994, and later photographs taken June 25, 1994, used by Bodziak during his rebuttal testimony to compare the two sets and dispute Dr. Lee's parallel-line imprint identifications. Introduced as People's 1337.

A printout of People's 195-B with a telestrator arrow marking the shoeprint area at the Bundy crime scene, introduced during Dennis Fung's cross-examination as People's 195-C.

People's 44-B is a photograph showing a heel print in blood near a landing area, identified and discussed during Detective Fuhrman's testimony.

A print of crime scene photograph 54-A with a circle marked by Detective Lange indicating a bloody shoeprint impression, introduced in the criminal trial as People's 54-A-1.

A preliminary hearing photograph (numbered 102) introduced as People's 12, showing a close-up of a dark brown leather glove and a bloody shoe print at the Bundy crime scene.

A preliminary hearing photograph (numbered 107) introduced as People's 15, showing the stoop and stairs where Nicole Simpson was found with a shoe print outline visible in a large pool of blood.

A series of seven preliminary hearing photographs (People's 19, sub-exhibits A through G) showing blood droplets (items 112–115) and bloody shoe prints (marked A-H through A-K by the criminalist) along the westward walkway path toward the rear gate at Bundy.

A proof sheet of selected negative strips sent by Bodziak to Goldberg approximately one to two weeks before Lee's testimony, together with contact sheets Bodziak created from crime-scene negatives received in August. During cross-examination, Scheck asserted that the defense had repeatedly requested the contact sheets but had not received them.

Photographs documenting shoeprints at the Bundy crime scene as they appeared on June 13, 1994, including thirty photographs submitted to Bodziak for analysis and photographs used during Fung's later return visit with Bodziak.