Bundy Shoeprint Photos Casts

A series of photographs of individual bloody shoeprints at Bundy, lettered A through P plus impressions S, X, Y, Q116, and additional items, introduced in the criminal trial as People's 390-A through 390-P, 391-S, 392-X, 390-Y, and 394 (Q116). Each photograph shows a specific impression matched to a European size 46 Silga sole; two very faint shoeprints on the same step as impression B were introduced as People's 395.

A board containing 15 photographs of bloody shoeprints along the walkway, stairs, landing, and path toward the rear alley at 875 South Bundy, taken June 13, 1994. Introduced in the criminal trial as People's 45 (sub-exhibits A through O) and in the civil trial as Plaintiffs' 41/43; Officer Riske stepped down and pointed out each shoeprint to the jury.

A set of overall and close-up photographs of the Bundy walkway tile area taken June 13, 1994, labeled A through K and mounted on a magnetized board as People's 598. The board was used during Dr. Lee's cross-examination and Bodziak's rebuttal testimony; duplicates D, E, and G were withdrawn, and two new panels (J and K) were added showing June 13 close-ups of Bruno Magli heel impressions H and I.

Photographs of left-heel impressions near the front gate of 875 South Bundy: Q68 near the front gate and Q67 near the white prescription-glasses envelope, both located in the caged-off soil area north of the walkway. Identified as matching a European size 46 Bruno Magli left heel despite heavy indistinction in Q67. Introduced in the criminal trial as People's 388–389 and displayed as graphic crime scene exhibits People's 56-G and People's 60; in the civil trial as Plaintiffs' 2207 and 2209.

Individual comparison charts for each identified bloody shoe print at Bundy (impressions A through J, L, M, N, O, S, X, Y, Q68, and Q116), introduced in the civil trial as Plaintiffs' 412A through O and 413–416. Companion overlays were admitted by reference to criminal case BA097211.

Photographs showing evidence item 112 — a bloody shoeprint with a blood drop to its left — taken at the Bundy crime scene. Introduced as People's 48-A and 48-B; used by Detective Lange to discuss blood drop and shoeprint locations pointing toward the building.

A set of blow-up and LAPD crime scene photographs of the Bundy walkway tile introduced by the defense through Dr. Henry Lee, marked Defense 1337-A, 1337-B, and 1337-C. Lee identified a parallel-line imprint pattern as a definitive shoeprint; Bodziak and the prosecution disputed this interpretation, and Lee later conceded the lines were most likely trawl marks or scratches. The civil counterpart Defense Exhibit 1337A includes a version with a sock outline drawn.

Three magnetized photographs of the Bundy walk showing the tile area at three positions — furthest up the walk, the middle, and furthest east toward Nicole's body — introduced during Dr. Lee's testimony as People's 599-A, B, and C.

A civil defense photograph (Defendants' 717 / 2257) showing a shoe print in congealed blood at the Bundy crime scene. Dr. Baden testified the print was made after the blood clotted, indicating movement occurred at least three to five minutes after bleeding stopped.

A two-panel board showing an aerial layout of the Bundy crime scene with color-coded shoeprint locations: purple for right foot, pink/red for left foot, and blue for indistinct impressions. Introduced in the criminal trial as People's 387-A and 387-B and used by Bodziak to orient all subsequent photograph comparisons.

Bloody shoe print on the walkway at Bundy. Identified as consistent with size 12 Bruno Magli shoes. Red-stained swatches (Items 55 and 56) were collected from the shoeprints by criminalists Fung and Mazzola; Item 56 yielded PCR polymarker results consistent with Nicole Brown Simpson with Simpson and Goldman excluded.

Carpeting from the driver's side of O.J. Simpson's Ford Bronco bearing a possible shoe-print pattern in blood; identified across trials as Item 33. Leucocrystal violet enhancement revealed blood stains examined as a potential footwear impression; one thread was tested by PCR. A transparency overlay of the Bruno Magli Silga sole design (People's 390-e) was aligned over the stain before the jury, and the blood was typed to Nicole Brown.

A civil defense exhibit (Defendants' 2214) comprising one or more crime scene photographs of the tile walkway at Bundy showing what appears to be a partial shoe print, displayed on the Elmo by Baker and Baden during examination of Detective Lange. A second photograph from the same exhibit shows shoe prints closer to the body.

A board entitled 'Shoe Prints at Bundy, June 13, 1994' used in the civil trial (Plaintiffs' 408) showing identified footwear impressions along the walkway, color-coded by foot: pink (left, size 46), purple (right, size 46), and blue (indeterminate). Baker challenged Bodziak on the 23 blue-dot prints not associated with Bruno Magli and on missing impressions near Nicole's body.

A chart titled 'Footwear Impressions After Stepping in Liquid' showing an artist rendering and Bodziak's test impressions demonstrating how bloody shoe prints fade over successive steps; includes test impressions made with the Bruno Magli Lorenzo shoe and latex paint. Introduced in the criminal trial as People's 386 and in the civil trial as Plaintiffs' 407.

A new board of Bundy walkway photographs introduced during Bodziak's rebuttal testimony in September 1995, People's 623-A through G, including oblique-lit black-and-white photos, color photos of shoeprints, a shoe impression made in wet concrete, and a photo showing tile with permanent concrete finishing marks.

Crime scene evidence showing a partial shoe impression on or near the white envelope containing prescription eyeglasses found at the Bundy scene. In the criminal trial the physical envelope was introduced as People's 32 with the partial shoe impression noted on its bottom edge; in the preliminary hearing a photograph of the same area (numbered 104) was introduced as People's 10, showing the white envelope with prescription glasses and a bloody shoe print pattern.

A box containing two Bruno Magli shoes — a Lyon (size 9.5) and a Lorenzo (size 12) — both with the same Silga sole design, retail price $160. Introduced in the civil trial as Plaintiffs' 395 and physically demonstrated by Bodziak to show the sole consistent with Bundy impressions.

A civil defense photograph (Defendants' Exhibit 2215) showing a possible shoe impression approximately five feet from Nicole Brown Simpson's neck, marked and displayed during Bodziak's testimony. Bodziak acknowledged the impression could be consistent with a Silga sole but stated he had never formally examined it.

Civil trial impression evidence (Exhibit 419) potentially matching a Silga sole, examined and challenged during Bodziak's testimony for Bruno Magli shoe identification.

Crime scene photographs (Exhibit 43) shown to Bodziak in the civil trial depicting possible but unclear footwear impressions at the Bundy scene; Bodziak explained he could not make objective comparisons from these photographs.

A civil trial crime scene shoe print photograph (Exhibit 49) used for comparison purposes during Bodziak's testimony.

A civil trial crime scene photograph (Exhibit 92) displayed during Detective Lange's testimony; Lange identified a partial heel print in the upper left quadrant of the image.

A magnetized board displaying crime scene photographs taken June 13, 1994, and later photographs taken June 25, 1994, used by Bodziak during his rebuttal testimony to compare the two sets and dispute Dr. Lee's parallel-line imprint identifications. Introduced as People's 1337.

A set of notes containing shoeprint measurements taken at the Bundy crime scene across three dates, marked for identification and authenticated by criminalist Dennis Fung as People's 178.

A printout of People's 195-B with a telestrator arrow marking the shoeprint area at the Bundy crime scene, introduced during Dennis Fung's cross-examination as People's 195-C.

A crime scene photograph showing a heel print in blood near the front landing area of 875 South Bundy, identified and discussed by Detective Fuhrman during his testimony as People's 44-B.

A print of crime scene photograph 54-A with a circle marked by Detective Lange indicating a bloody shoeprint impression, introduced in the criminal trial as People's 54-A-1.

A series of civil-trial photographs (Plaintiffs' 44 through 56) documenting bloody shoe prints along the walkway and stairwells at Bundy, introduced through Detective Lange to establish the trail of shoe prints from the front steps to the rear alley.

A preliminary hearing photograph (numbered 102) introduced as People's 12, showing a close-up of a dark brown leather glove and a bloody shoe print at the Bundy crime scene.

A preliminary hearing photograph (numbered 107) introduced as People's 15, showing the stoop and stairs where Nicole Simpson was found with a shoe print outline visible in a large pool of blood.

A series of seven preliminary hearing photographs (People's 19, sub-exhibits A through G) showing blood droplets (items 112–115) and bloody shoe prints (marked A-H through A-K by the criminalist) along the westward walkway path toward the rear gate at Bundy.

Size 12 Bruno Magli Lorenzo-style shoes with Silga soles left bloody shoe prints on the walkway at 875 South Bundy Drive, leading westward from both victims toward the rear gate. Witnesses including Detectives Lange, Phillips, Fuhrman, and Rossi confirmed the prints were present before the lead detectives arrived. A single set of prints moved west with no return set, consistent with one perpetrator exiting through the rear alley.