📄 Recross-examination of Gregory Matheson (part 2) — Friday, May 5, 1995
Address:
C:\DEPT103\CRIMINAL\1995\MAY\5\RECROSS-EXAMINATION-OF-GREGORY.DOC
TRIAL
▲ Day 68 of 167

Recross-examination of Gregory Matheson (part 2)

Witness: Gregory Matheson
Examiner: Robert Blasier
Called by: Prosecution • Date: Friday, May 5, 1995 • Lines: 11
Defense attorney Robert Blasier conducted a brief three-question recross of criminalist Gregory Matheson focused on Blasier's question describing the Grunbaum article as referencing degraded BA blood being mistyped as type B. Matheson admitted he could not say exactly how many bands the degraded sample had. Blasier asked whether he had contacted Dr. Grunbaum or Mr. Zajac, but Matheson did not answer before the questioning ended. Judge Ito pointedly noted that Blasier's declared 'one question' had become three.
1 MR. BLASIER:

One question.

FURTHER RECROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR. BLASIER

2 MR. BLASIER:

Mr. Matheson, in the Grunbaum article that you testified to where there's reference to one example of a BA degrading and being mistyped as a b, do you have any idea how many bands that degraded BA had?

3 MR. GOLDBERG:

Calls for speculation, asked and answered.

4 THE COURT:

Overruled.

5 MR. MATHESON:

Not exactly, no.

6 MR. BLASIER:

You can't tell whether there were two bands at the end or one band, can you?

7 MR. MATHESON:

Not unless the term "patterns" makes reference to that, but not specifically, no.

8 MR. BLASIER:

Have you ever called Dr. Grunbaum or Mr. Zajac and ask them?

9 MR. GOLDBERG:

Calls for speculation, your Honor.

10 THE COURT:

That's three. That's three.

KEY QUOTE
11 MR. BLASIER:

No further questions.

Temperature

procedural

Key Quotes (2)

Gregory Matheson
Not exactly, no.
Matheson says he cannot identify the band count exactly, establishing uncertainty about that detail.
Lance A. Ito
That's three. That's three.
Ito notes that Blasier's announced 'one question' had become three, creating a light procedural moment.

Evidence (1)

Informal
The Grunbaum article, referenced in Blasier's question as involving a degraded BA sample, mistyping, and band count
discussed, challenged

Notable Exchanges (2)

Robert BlasierGregory Matheson
Blasier presses Matheson on the band count for the degraded BA sample referenced in his question. Matheson says he does not know the count exactly and cannot say specifically whether there were two bands or one. Blasier then asks whether Matheson had called Dr. Grunbaum or Mr. Zajac, but Matheson gives no answer before questioning ends.
strategic
Robert BlasierLance A. Ito
Blasier announced 'one question' at the start but asked three; Ito noted this pointedly as Blasier concluded.
light

Light Moments (1)

Lance A. Ito
Blasier promised 'one question' and asked three; Ito called it out with 'That's three. That's three.'

Credibility Attacks (1)

⚔ Gregory Matheson
knowledge gap
Blasier questioned Matheson about a key technical detail—the band count in the degraded sample—and Matheson said he did not know it exactly.

Objections

2 objections (0 sustained, 1 overruled)
Proceeding 5938 • 11 lines • Prosecution witness
Criminal Trial
Department 103
📂 MAY 5, 1995 📄 Recross-examination of Gregory
MAY 5, 1995