📄 Sidebar (3) — Wednesday, May 24, 1995
Address:
C:\DEPT103\CRIMINAL\1995\MAY\24\SIDEBAR-3-.DOC
TRIAL
▲ Day 81 of 167

Sidebar (3)

Date: Wednesday, May 24, 1995 • Utterances: 6
A brief bench conference in which Judge Ito flagged a problem with a statement that had just come in and announced he would strike the answer. Scheck pushed back, arguing that striking it would actually open the door to the witness's entire statement — a point the judge conceded before moving on.
1 (The following proceedings were held at the bench:)
2 THE COURT:

We've got a huge problem. We just brought in a statement. I'm going to strike the answer.

KEY QUOTE
3 MR. SCHECK:

No, your Honor. Your Honor, I'm not against it. It opens the door to his entire statement.

4 THE COURT:

It does.

5 MS. CLARK:

Wait, wait, wait.

6 THE COURT:

Proceed.

Temperature

tense

Key Quotes (3)

Lance A. Ito
We've got a huge problem. We just brought in a statement. I'm going to strike the answer.
Judge signals an evidentiary problem serious enough to require immediate correction mid-testimony.
Barry Scheck
I'm not against it. It opens the door to his entire statement.
Scheck flips the motion — he welcomes the ruling because striking would paradoxically let in more, not less.
Lance A. Ito
It does.
Terse judicial acknowledgment that Scheck's door-opening argument is correct.

Evidence (1)

Informal
An unspecified statement just introduced into the record
discussed, proposed to be stricken

Notable Exchanges (1)

Lance A. ItoBarry ScheckMarcia Clark
Judge moves to strike an answer; Scheck agrees but warns it will open the door to the full statement; Clark tries to interject but is cut off when the judge proceeds.
strategic

Objections

None recorded
Proceeding 6186 • 6 utterances
Criminal Trial
Department 103
⚖️ Start
📂 MAY 24, 1995 📄 Sidebar (3)
MAY 24, 1995 KRT DvH TD