This is kind of where we're going to go with Mr. Yamauchi too. These proficiency tests, I think there's a 352 problem. I don't know if there's an offer of proof or if he just wants to go over the whole proficiency test. I understand from the Defense consultants the spin they want to put on these things, but they're either right or they're wrong, and I just wanted to alert you that we're going to spend an inordinate amount of time over the next two weeks if you allow them to go into every proficiency test without a specific offer of proof. I'm saying it's irrelevant I guess is the legal objection.
I'm just going into one. The reason it's relevant is because they didn't get the right results. There's an allele there that's not supposed to be there. They're stating the result they got is right. In my view, it's misleading. This shows that, and that's the only one I'm going to cover.
we're going to spend an inordinate amount of time over the next two weeks if you allow them to go into every proficiency test without a specific offer of proof
There's an allele there that's not supposed to be there. They're stating the result they got is right. In my view, it's misleading.