📄 Re-redirect examination of Jack McKay (part 2) — Tuesday, July 11, 1995
Address:
C:\DEPT103\CRIMINAL\1995\JUL\11\RE-REDIRECT-EXAMINATION-OF-JAC.DOC
TRIAL
▲ Day 112 of 167

Re-redirect examination of Jack McKay (part 2)

Witness: Jack McKay
Examiner: Johnnie Cochran
Called by: Defense • Date: Tuesday, July 11, 1995 • Utterances: 19
A brief, almost perfunctory end to Jack McKay's recross-examination, in which Clark confirms McKay's prior statement that Simpson made no complaints about physical limitations in McKay's presence. The proceeding immediately transitions to the next defense witness, Dan Mandel, with some confusion about who was being called.
1 THE COURT:

Miss Clark.

FURTHER RECROSS-EXAMINATION BY MS. CLARK

2 MS. CLARK:

But in your statement, sir, you explicitly said: "Mr. Simpson did not complain of any physical limitations and did not indicate whether he was taking any medication did not do so in Mr. McKay's presence," correct?

3 MR. MCKAY:

He did not complain.

KEY QUOTE
4 MS. CLARK:

I have nothing further.

5 MR. COCHRAN:

May Mr. McKay be excused, your Honor?

6 THE COURT:

Has the Metro made it down to Alexandria yet?

KEY QUOTE
7 MR. MCKAY:

I hope so.

8 THE COURT:

Okay. Thank you very much, Mr. McKay.

9 MR. MCKAY:

Thank you.

10 MR. COCHRAN:

Thank you.

11 THE COURT:

All right. Next witness.

12 MR. SHAPIRO:

Thank you very much, your Honor. If the Court pleases, we call Mr. Dan Mandel.

13 THE COURT:

All right. Mr. Mandel, would you come forward, please.

14 MR. COCHRAN:

No, wrong person.

15 MR. COCHRAN:

No, your Honor. We have lots of witnesses all ready.

16 THE COURT:

I might have to give you an extended lunch hour to recoup from all this.

17 MR. COCHRAN:

I appreciate that, your Honor. I promise to make it up in the afternoon.

18 THE COURT:

All right. Are you Mr. Mandel?

19 MR. MANDEL:

Good morning.

Temperature

routine

Key Quotes (3)

Marcia Clark
Mr. Simpson did not complain of any physical limitations and did not indicate whether he was taking any medication did not do so in Mr. McKay's presence, correct?
Clark locks in McKay's statement to foreclose any defense use of his testimony to support Simpson's arthritis/glove-fit claims.
Jack McKay
He did not complain.
Concise confirmation that McKay's testimony does not help establish Simpson's physical limitations.
Lance A. Ito
Has the Metro made it down to Alexandria yet?
Light sidebar banter — Ito making small talk as the witness is excused, suggesting a relaxed close to a low-stakes examination.

Notable Exchanges (1)

Robert ShapiroJohnnie CochranLance A. Ito
Shapiro calls Dan Mandel as the next witness, but the wrong person approaches; Cochran clarifies. Ito jokes about giving the defense an extended lunch to get organized.
light

Light Moments (3)

Lance A. Ito
Ito asks McKay whether the Metro has made it to Alexandria yet — friendly small talk as he dismisses the witness.
Lance A. Ito
Ito offers the defense an extended lunch hour to 'recoup,' and Cochran promises to make it up in the afternoon.
Johnnie Cochran
Wrong person approaches the stand when Dan Mandel is called; Cochran announces 'No, wrong person.'

Credibility Attacks (1)

⚔ Jack McKay
prior inconsistent statement (pinning)
Clark quotes McKay's own prior statement back to him to confirm Simpson made no complaints about physical limitations, neutralizing any implication his testimony supported the glove-fit defense.

Objections

None recorded
Proceeding 6725 • 19 utterances • Defense witness
Criminal Trial
Department 103
⚖️ Start
📂 JUL 11, 1995 📄 Re-redirect examination of Jac
JUL 11, 1995 KRT DvH TD