ONCE AGAIN, I SEE THAT COUNSEL IS PROPOSING TO SHOW A PHOTOGRAPH TO THE WITNESS WITHOUT LAYING FOUNDATION AS TO WHETHER OR NOT HE SAW THE ITEM IN QUESTION, AND BASED ON THE OFFICER'S TESTIMONY THUS FAR, IT'S PRETTY MUCH A FOREGONE CONCLUSION THAT HE DID NOT.
YEAH. AND ALL I'M ASKING IS THAT PREEMPTIVELY, COUNSEL BE REQUIRED TO LAY A FOUNDATION THAT THIS WITNESS SAW WHAT HE'S GOING TO REFER TO IN THE PHOTOGRAPH.
CAN YOU PASS THAT TO ME, OVER THERE? THIS IS A PICTURE OF THE GLOVE. THERE IS A CONTAINER THERE. I WANT TO ASK HIM IF HE SAW THAT THERE. I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHAT SHE IS TALKING ABOUT. THESE ARE PHOTOS WE GOT IN DISCOVERY. THIS IS A CONTAINER THAT WAS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE FENCE, WHICH IT APPEARS TO BE SOME BLUE PLASTIC BAG OR SOMETHING. IT LOOKS THAT AS THOUGH SOMETHING WAS CARRIED OUT. I'M GOING TO ASK HIM --
AS LONG AS COUNSEL DOESN'T EDITORIALIZE SOMETHING WAS CARRIED, THAT BLUE PLASTIC CONTAINER.
KEY QUOTEIT'S PRETTY MUCH A FOREGONE CONCLUSION THAT HE DID NOT.
IT LOOKS AS THOUGH SOMETHING WAS CARRIED OUT. I'M GOING TO ASK HIM --
AS LONG AS COUNSEL DOESN'T EDITORIALIZE SOMETHING WAS CARRIED, THAT BLUE PLASTIC CONTAINER.
I THINK THE OBJECTION IS PREMATURE AT THIS POINT.