📄 Cross-examination of Dennis Fung (afternoon, part 1) — Wednesday, April 5, 1995
Address:
C:\DEPT103\CRIMINAL\1995\APR\5\CROSS-EXAMINATION-OF-DENNIS-FU.DOC
TRIAL
▲ Day 52 of 167

Cross-examination of Dennis Fung (afternoon, part 1)

Witness: Dennis Fung
Examiner: Barry Scheck
Called by: Prosecution • Date: Wednesday, April 5, 1995 • Utterances: 168
Barry Scheck continues cross-examining LAPD criminalist Dennis Fung, pressing him on his uncertainty about how Detective Fuhrman collected Item No. 10, the absence of a video camera at the Bundy crime scene (while one was used at Rockingham specifically to protect the LAPD from civil liability), and Fung's 10-plus preparation sessions with prosecutor Goldberg. Scheck methodically establishes documentation gaps and Fung's fuzzy recollections about key evidence collection moments.
1 Q:

GOOD AFTERNOON, MR. FUNG.

2 A:

GOOD MORNING.

3 Q:

MR. FUNG, WHEN WE LEFT, YOU WERE TELLING US ABOUT DETECTIVE FUHRMAN COLLECTING ITEM NO. 10. I THINK YOU TOLD US YESTERDAY, DID YOU NOT, THAT HE TRANSFERRED, THAT HE HANDED THAT TO YOU OVER THE FENCE?

4 A:

YES.

5 Q:

ALL RIGHT. BUT YOUR RECOLLECTION NOW IS NOT VERY CLEAR ON EXACTLY WHETHER HE USED THE SCOOP METHOD OR GLOVES?

6 MR. GOLDBERG:

MISSTATES THE TESTIMONY.

7 THE COURT:

SUSTAINED. REPHRASE THE QUESTION.

8 Q:

BY MR. SCHECK: DO YOU HAVE A CLEAR RECOLLECTION AS TO WHETHER OR NOT DETECTIVE FUHRMAN HAD GLOVES?

9 A:

NO.

10 Q:

AND DO YOU HAVE A CLEAR RECOLLECTION AS TO WHETHER HE USED THE SCOOP METHOD?

11 A:

NO.

12 Q:

AND IS IT YOUR TESTIMONY THAT HE PICKED THIS ITEM UP AND HE HANDED IT TO YOU OVER THAT FENCE? IS THAT HOW IT HAPPENED OR DO YOU RECALL?

13 A:

IT WAS IN A COIN ENVELOPE AND HE HANDED IT TO ME OVER THE FENCE (INDICATING).

14 Q:

OKAY. SO IT WAS ONE OF THOSE LITTLE COIN ENVELOPES?

15 A:

YES.

16 Q:

ALL RIGHT. AND GIVEN THE FACT THAT IT'S A LITTLE COIN ENVELOPE, WOULD IT NOT BE DIFFICULT TO BE USING THE SCOOP METHOD WITH THE COIN ENVELOPE?

17 MR. GOLDBERG:

CALLS FOR SPECULATION.

18 THE COURT:

SUSTAINED.

19 Q:

BY MR. SCHECK: ORDINARILY, WOULD YOU USE THE SCOOP METHOD WITH ONE OF THOSE SMALL COIN ENVELOPES?

20 A:

I'VE DONE IT BEFORE.

21 Q:

IT'S FAIRLY DIFFICULT, ISN'T IT, AS OPPOSED TO A LARGE PAPER BAG?

22 A:

NO.

23 Q:

NO?

24 A:

IT IS MORE DIFFICULT, BUT IT'S NOT A LOT MORE DIFFICULT.

25 Q:

OKAY. SO IT'S MORE DIFFICULT?

26 A:

A LITTLE BIT, YES.

27 Q:

OKAY. AND THIS --

28 MR. SCHECK:

ASK THIS PHOTOGRAPH BE MARKED AS DEFENDANT'S NEXT IN ORDER.

29 THE COURT:

1073.

30 MR. SCHECK:

1073.

31 THE COURT:

ALL RIGHT. DEFENSE 1073.

32 (DEFT'S 1073 FOR ID = PHOTOGRAPH)
33 MR. SCHECK:

MAY I APPROACH THE WITNESS, YOUR HONOR?

34 THE COURT:

YOU MAY.

35 Q:

BY MR. SCHECK: MR. FUNG, IS THIS A PHOTOGRAPH OF ITEM NO. 10 AS YOU SAW IT ON THE MORNING OF JUNE 13TH?

36 A:

YES.

37 MR. SCHECK:

MAY I PUT THIS ON THE ELMO, YOUR HONOR?

38 THE COURT:

YOU MAY.

39 MR. SCHECK:

MR. HARRIS, CAN YOU PULL BACK FROM THAT A LITTLE BIT?

40 Q:

BY MR. SCHECK: MR. FUNG, GIVEN THE LOCATION OF THAT ITEM NO. 10, ONE WOULD -- TO USE THE SCOOP METHOD THERE, YOU MIGHT GET SOME LEAVES OR DEBRIS INTO THE COIN ENVELOPE?

41 A:

PERHAPS.

42 Q:

PERHAPS? DON'T YOU THINK THAT'S LIKELY GIVEN ITS LOCATION?

43 A:

NOT NECESSARILY, NO.

44 Q:

NO? AND TO THE BEST OF YOUR RECOLLECTION, THERE ARE NO LEAVES IN THAT COIN ENVELOPE, ARE THERE?

45 A:

TO THE BEST OF MY RECOLLECTION, YEAH, THERE ARE NO LEAVES IN THERE, RIGHT.

46 Q:

SO IF DETECTIVE FUHRMAN WERE TO HAVE USED GLOVES AND PICKED THAT UP AND PUT IT INTO THE COIN ENVELOPE, IT WOULD BE LESS LIKELY TO HAVE LEAVES IN IT; WOULDN'T YOU THINK?

47 MR. GOLDBERG:

YOUR HONOR, IT'S IRRELEVANT.

48 THE COURT:

CALLS FOR SPECULATION.

49 Q:

BY MR. SCHECK: MR. FUNG, LET'S MOVE ON TO THE BUNDY CRIME SCENE. YOU ARRIVED THERE AT ABOUT WHAT TIME?

50 A:

I ARRIVED THERE AT 10:15 IN THE MORNING.

51 Q:

ALL RIGHT. AND BEFORE YOU GOT THERE, STILL -- DID IT COME TO YOUR ATTENTION THAT A STILL PHOTOGRAPHER HAD ALREADY BEEN ON THE SCENE AND HAD TAKEN PICTURES?

52 A:

YES.

53 Q:

AND THERE WAS NO VIDEO CAMERA AT THE BUNDY CRIME SCENE, WAS THERE?

54 A:

THERE WAS A LOT OF NEWS MEDIA WITH VIDEO CAMERAS.

55 Q:

I UNDERSTAND THAT. YOU'VE SEEN A NUMBER OF THESE TAPES; HAVE YOU NOT, SIR?

56 A:

YES.

57 Q:

YOU HAVE REVIEWED THEM VERY CAREFULLY BEFORE YOU CAME TO TESTIFY?

58 A:

I'VE REVIEWED THEM.

59 Q:

ABOUT HOW MANY TIMES?

60 A:

ONCE, TWICE.

61 Q:

ONCE, TWICE? WITH THE -- ANY MEMBERS OF THE PROSECUTION TEAM?

62 A:

YES.

63 Q:

AND WHO WAS THAT?

64 A:

THAT WAS MR. GOLDBERG.

65 Q:

ANYONE ELSE?

66 A:

HE'S THE ONLY ONE I RECALL BEING THERE.

67 Q:

AND HOW MANY TIMES DID YOU DO THAT?

68 A:

ONCE.

69 Q:

AND ABOUT HOW MANY HOURS DID IT TAKE YOU?

70 A:

TOOK AWHILE. I DON'T REMEMBER. MAYBE THREE HOURS. I DON'T RECALL.

71 Q:

AND YOU STUDIED THEM CAREFULLY; DID YOU NOT?

72 A:

WE LOOKED AT THEM.

73 Q:

AND INCIDENTALLY, BEFORE YOU CAME AND TESTIFIED ON DIRECT EXAMINATION, DID YOU UNDERGO A NUMBER OF PREPARATION SESSIONS?

74 A:

YES. I MET WITH MR. GOLDBERG A FEW TIMES.

75 Q:

ABOUT HOW MANY?

76 A:

MORE THAN 10.

77 Q:

MORE THAN 10?

78 A:

YES.

79 Q:

AND ABOUT HOW LONG DO YOU -- DID EACH OF THESE SESSIONS TAKE IF YOU RECALL?

80 A:

THEY VARIED ANYWHERE FROM FIVE MINUTES TO THREE OR FOUR OR FIVE HOURS.

81 Q:

AND DID YOU EVER HAVE A SESSION WHERE PEOPLE WERE BROUGHT IN THAT CROSS-EXAMINED YOU IN PREPARATION?

82 A:

NO.

83 Q:

NOW, THERE ARE VIDEO CAMERAS AVAILABLE AT THE SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATION DIVISION; ARE THERE NOT?

84 A:

YES, THERE ARE.

85 Q:

AND ON OCCASION, THESE VIDEO CAMERAS ARE USED TO TAKE VIDEOTAPES OF CRIME SCENES?

86 A:

ON OCCASION, YES.

87 Q:

AND THAT IS DONE AT THE REQUEST OF THE CRIMINALIST?

88 A:

NO. USUALLY THAT'S DONE AT THE REQUEST OF A DETECTIVE.

89 Q:

DETECTIVE. SOMETIMES AT THE REQUEST OF THE CRIMINALIST?

90 A:

I HAVE NEVER HAD OCCASION TO REQUEST ONE.

91 Q:

BUT SOMETIMES DETECTIVES HAVE?

92 A:

YES.

93 Q:

AND IF ONE TAKES A VIDEO CAMERA TO A CRIME SCENE, THERE ARE SOME ADVANTAGES TO USING IT?

94 MR. GOLDBERG:

YOUR HONOR, I'LL OBJECT, THAT IT'S IRRELEVANT.

95 THE COURT:

OVERRULED.

96 DENNIS FUNG:

THERE MAY BE.

97 Q:

BY MR. SCHECK: AND THE ADVANTAGE -- ONE OF THE ADVANTAGES IS THAT YOU CAN PAN THE ENTIRE SCENE IN ONE CONTINUOUS SWEEPING SHOT TO SEE WHERE THE EVIDENCE LIES?

98 A:

THAT WOULD BE ONE ADVANTAGE, YES.

99 Q:

AND THAT'S -- IT CUTS DOWN ON THE SELECTIVITY THAT ONE GETS WHEN YOU TAKE STILL PHOTOGRAPHS?

100 A:

WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY SELECTIVITY?

101 Q:

WELL, WHEN ONE CHOOSES TO TAKE A PHOTOGRAPH AT A CERTAIN ANGLE, A STILL PHOTOGRAPH, ONE IS MAKING A SELECTION ABOUT THE ANGLE AT WHICH THE PICTURE IS TAKEN?

102 A:

YES.

103 Q:

AND ORDINARILY WHEN YOU DIRECT THE FORENSIC PHOTOGRAPHERS AT A CRIME SCENE, YOU MAKE YOUR BEST JUDGMENT ABOUT WHAT ANGLES TO TAKE TO ILLUSTRATE THE EVIDENCE WELL?

104 A:

I WILL GIVE PHOTOGRAPHERS THE INSTRUCTIONS TO TAKE OVERALLS OF THE CRIME SCENE, AND THEN AFTER THAT IS DONE, THAT THERE ARE SPECIFIC SHOTS THAT I WILL DIRECT THEM TO TAKE.

105 Q:

BUT AN ADVANTAGE OF VIDEO IS THAT WHEN YOU TAKE AN OVERALL OF THE CRIME SCENE WITH A VIDEO, ONE GETS MORE THAN IF YOU TAKE AN OVER -- YOU TAKE A SERIES OF STILL SHOTS?

106 A:

THAT'S POSSIBLE. MAY NOT BE -- NOT IN ALL CASES THOUGH.

107 Q:

WELL, IF DONE WELL WITH A VIDEO, WOULDN'T THAT ORDINARILY BE TRUE IN YOUR JUDGMENT?

108 A:

IF DONE WELL WITH PHOTOGRAPHY, THAT'S JUST AS GOOD.

109 Q:

YOU THINK IT'S JUST AS GOOD TO DO A SERIES OF STILL PHOTOGRAPHS AS OPPOSED TO A VIDEO?

110 MR. GOLDBERG:

YOUR HONOR, THIS IS IRRELEVANT.

111 THE COURT:

IT'S ARGUMENTATIVE AS WELL.

112 Q:

BY MR. SCHECK: DO YOU KNOW IF, IN YOUR EXPERIENCE AS A CRIMINALIST, WHETHER OTHER MAJOR METROPOLITAN AREAS ROUTINELY USE VIDEOTAPES FOR CRIME SCENES?

113 A:

I'VE HEARD IT MENTIONED THAT SOME PEOPLE OR SOME JURISDICTIONS DO USE THEM ON OCCASION. I DON'T KNOW IF THEY USE THEM ON A ROUTINE BASIS THOUGH.

114 Q:

WELL, THERE WAS A VIDEO USED IN THIS CASE, WASN'T THERE?

115 A:

YES, THERE WAS.

116 Q:

THAT THAT VIDEO WAS A VIDEOTAPE TAKEN AT ROCKINGHAM?

117 A:

YES.

118 Q:

THAT WAS A VIDEOTAPE OR AT LEAST ONE PURPOSE OF IT WAS TO TAKE SHOTS OF THE INTERIOR OF MR. SIMPSON'S RESIDENCE?

119 MR. GOLDBERG:

WELL, THERE'S NO FOUNDATION, YOUR HONOR.

120 THE COURT:

SUSTAINED.

121 Q:

BY MR. SCHECK: DO YOU KNOW IF A VIDEO WAS TAKEN AT ROCKINGHAM ON THE AFTERNOON OF JUNE 13 OF THE INTERIOR OF MR. SIMPSON'S RESIDENCE?

122 A:

YES.

123 Q:

AND DO YOU KNOW IF ONE OF THE PURPOSES OF THAT VIDEOTAPE WAS TO PROTECT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT FROM CIVIL LIABILITY?

124 A:

I BELIEVE THAT WAS THE PURPOSE OF THE VIDEO.

KEY QUOTE
125 Q:

AND -- BUT THERE WAS NO VIDEO CAMERA TO RECORD THE BUNDY CRIME SCENE, WAS THERE?

126 A:

I DID NOT OBSERVE ONE.

127 Q:

NOW, WHEN YOU ARRIVED AT BUNDY, IT WAS WHAT TIME? 10:15?

128 A:

YES.

129 Q:

AND YOU TOLD US THAT YOU HAD HEARD OR YOU BELIEVED AT THAT TIME THAT THE VICTIMS WERE FIRST DISCOVERED SOMETIME IN THE EARLY MORNING HOURS?

130 A:

YES.

131 Q:

SO BY THE -- EXCUSE ME. BY THE TIME YOU ARRIVED AT BUNDY, IT WAS SOMETHING ON THE ORDER OF 10 HOURS TO YOUR KNOWLEDGE FROM WHEN THE BODIES WERE FIRST FOUND?

132 A:

SOMETHING LIKE THAT.

133 Q:

AND ISN'T THAT, MR. FUNG, FAIRLY LATE IN THE ORDINARY COURSE OF HOMICIDE INVESTIGATIONS FOR CRIMINALISTS TO ARRIVE AT THE CRIME SCENE?

134 A:

I HAVE ARRIVED AT CRIME SCENES WHEN THE BODIES ARE MONTHS OLD.

135 Q:

WELL, THAT'S BECAUSE NOBODY FOUND THEM FOR MONTHS, RIGHT?

136 A:

THAT'S CORRECT.

137 Q:

BUT WHEN YOU GET A HOMICIDE CALL, YOU TOLD US THAT YOU TRY TO GET TO THE SCENE WITHIN AN HOUR OF THE CALL?

138 A:

THAT'S OUR -- THAT'S OUR GOAL FOR OUR RESPONSE TIME, YES.

139 Q:

AND IT'S IMPORTANT TO GET THE CRIMINALISTS AT THE SCENE BEFORE THE CORONERS?

140 THE COURT:

I THINK WE'RE ASKED THIS QUESTION ABOUT THE FIFTH TIME.

KEY QUOTE
141 MR. SCHECK:

I UNDERSTAND THAT. I UNDERSTAND THAT, YOUR HONOR. I'M JUST FOUNDATIONALLY LEADING TO SOMETHING ELSE.

142 THE COURT:

WELL, LET'S GET THERE.

143 DENNIS FUNG:

IT'S PREFERABLE.

144 Q:

BY MR. SCHECK: NOW, YOU HAVE OBSERVED PHOTOGRAPHS IN YOUR CONSIDERATION OF THE EVIDENCE IN THIS CASE THAT WERE TAKEN BEFORE YOU ARRIVED AT THE SCENE?

145 A:

COULD YOU REPEAT THAT?

146 Q:

HAVE YOU LOOKED AT PHOTOGRAPHS THAT WERE TAKEN OF THE BUNDY CRIME SCENE BEFORE YOU ARRIVED?

147 A:

YES.

148 Q:

AND YOU HAVE CONSIDERED THOSE IN YOUR ATTEMPTS TO DO CRIME SCENE RECONSTRUCTION IN THIS CASE?

149 MR. GOLDBERG:

OBJECTION. MISSTATES A FACT NOT IN EVIDENCE.

150 THE COURT:

SUSTAINED.

151 Q:

BY MR. SCHECK: ALL RIGHT. HAVE YOU ATTEMPTED DURING THE COURSE OF YOUR CONSIDERATION OF THIS MATTER TO RECONSTRUCT THE CRIME SCENE THAT YOU FOUND AT BUNDY?

152 MR. GOLDBERG:

IT'S VAGUE.

153 THE COURT:

SUSTAINED.

154 Q:

BY MR. SCHECK: WHAT IS CRIME SCENE RECONSTRUCTION? I THINK YOU TALKED ABOUT THIS --

155 A:

RECONSTRUCTION -- CRIME SCENE RECONSTRUCTION IS USING THE PHYSICAL EVIDENCE AT THE SCENE TO TRY TO COME UP WITH A SCENARIO AS TO WHAT HAS HAPPENED.

156 Q:

AND IN DOING THAT -- YOU DID THAT IN THIS CASE, TRIED TO DO THAT IN THIS CASE?

157 A:

ONLY IN A VERY LIMITED FASHION.

158 Q:

BUT YOU TRIED?

159 A:

IN A LIMITED FASHION.

160 Q:

AND YOU PARTICIPATED WITH THE DETECTIVES IN THEIR EFFORTS TO DO SO?

161 MR. GOLDBERG:

IT'S VAGUE, YOUR HONOR.

162 THE COURT:

OVERRULED.

163 DENNIS FUNG:

IN A VERY LIMITED FASHION.

164 Q:

BY MR. SCHECK: AND OTHER EXPERTS HAVE COME AND DISCUSSED THE CRIME SCENE AS YOU FOUND IT AT BUNDY WITH YOU IN THEIR ATTEMPTS TO DO RECONSTRUCTION IN THIS CASE?

165 A:

YES.

166 MR. SCHECK:

YOUR HONOR, MAY WE APPROACH WITH THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR ONE MOMENT ABOUT THE PHOTOGRAPH?

167 THE COURT:

DO YOU NEED THE REPORTER?

168 MR. SCHECK:

YES, I THINK SO.

Temperature

tense

Key Quotes (4)

Dennis Fung
MORE THAN 10.
Fung admits to having over 10 preparation sessions with prosecutor Goldberg before testifying — a number that surprised even Scheck, who repeated it back incredulously.
Dennis Fung
I BELIEVE THAT WAS THE PURPOSE OF THE VIDEO.
Fung acknowledges the Rockingham video was made to protect the LAPD from civil liability — while no video was made of the Bundy crime scene, the primary murder location.
Dennis Fung
NO. [I have a clear recollection of whether Fuhrman had gloves]
Flat admission that Fung cannot clearly recall whether Fuhrman wore gloves when collecting Item No. 10, a central evidence-handling issue.
Lance A. Ito
I THINK WE'RE ASKED THIS QUESTION ABOUT THE FIFTH TIME.
Judge's mild exasperation signals Scheck is being methodically repetitive — a deliberate strategy to emphasize Fung's earlier admissions.

Evidence (3)

Item No. 10
Physical evidence (in a coin envelope) collected by Fuhrman at Rockingham and handed to Fung over the fence
challenged — collection method and whether Fuhrman wore gloves disputed
Defense 1073
Photograph of Item No. 10 as it appeared at the scene on the morning of June 13th
introduced and displayed on ELMO
Informal
Videotape taken at Rockingham interior on afternoon of June 13th
discussed — Fung confirmed it was made to protect LAPD from civil liability, contrasting with no video at Bundy

Notable Exchanges (3)

Barry ScheckDennis Fung
Scheck walks Fung through his 10+ preparation sessions with Goldberg, drawing out that sessions lasted up to five hours and included reviewing videotapes together — painting a picture of an extensively coached witness.
strategic
Barry ScheckDennis Fung
Scheck establishes that there was no LAPD video camera at the Bundy crime scene despite one being available, while a video was made at Rockingham — for civil liability protection. Fung openly confirms the purpose.
revealing
Barry ScheckDennis Fung
Extended exchange about whether still photography is equivalent to video for documenting crime scenes. Fung holds his ground that still photography 'is just as good,' prompting a mild rebuke from Ito for argumentativeness.
procedural

Light Moments (1)

Dennis Fung
Fung opens by responding 'GOOD MORNING' to Scheck's 'GOOD AFTERNOON' greeting, a small slip that highlights the disorienting marathon of this cross-examination.

Credibility Attacks (2)

⚔ Dennis Fung
prior inconsistent recollection / lack of clear memory
Scheck established Fung has no clear recollection of whether Fuhrman wore gloves or used the scoop method when collecting Item No. 10 — despite this being a critical chain-of-custody moment.
⚔ Dennis Fung
bias / extensive prosecution coaching
Scheck elicited that Fung met with prosecutor Goldberg more than 10 times in preparation sessions lasting up to five hours each, and reviewed crime scene videotapes together — suggesting the witness was extensively shaped before testifying.

Objections

9 objections (7 sustained, 2 overruled)
Proceeding 5615 • 168 utterances • Prosecution witness
Criminal Trial
Department 103
⚖️ Start
📂 APR 5, 1995 📄 Cross-examination of Dennis Fu
APR 5, 1995 KRT DvH TD