The scope here with respect to the reexamination has to do with what he did on the afternoon of June 13th. And one of those things is, he inspected the blood vial. And I think I'm entitled to test his recollection as to his inspection of the blood vial and what it looked like in order to probe his version of these events. And all I'm asking him to do is--the only reason that the June 14th testimony is relevant is that there is a report saying when he looked at the vial on June 14th, it was pretty much full. I want to know if the vial--I want to ask him if the vial on June 13th was at the same level as when he saw it on June 14th. I want to probe his recollection as to how much blood was in the vial.
It's still irrelevant. this isn't anything I went into on redirect. I didn't ask him about that. This has to end somewhere, your Honor. We've been at it eight days.
--to his version of events, looking at the vial. He also did testify to this in terms of whether he tampered with anything, et cetera, on redirect.
I can do this very quickly with this one question, have him put on this vial where he thinks he saw the blood and be over with it.
I want to ask him if the vial on June 13th was at the same level as when he saw it on June 14th. I want to probe his recollection as to how much blood was in the vial.
This has to end somewhere, your Honor. We've been at it eight days.
He said he couldn't do it already. I'll sustain the scope objection.