Plaintiffs' rebuttal case begins with photographs allegedly showing O.J. Simpson in Bruno Magli shoes from 1993, but the photographer's credibility is severely attacked for financial motives and timeline inconsistencies. Forensic expert Gerald Richards systematically rebuts defense expert Groden's photo alteration claims through microscopic analysis and precise measurement. The defense rests after testimony questioning police procedures and property access, setting the stage for the expert credibility battle that dominates the day.

• Judge gives a state-of-mind-only limiting instruction on a letter purportedly written by Nicole Brown Simpson, then corrects the jury after deferring formal admission until plaintiffs' rebuttal
• A vehicle impound report prepared by Officer Thompson's partner contains anomalous battery and alternator entries even though Thompson said the hood was not opened during his watch; Thompson later acknowledged he did not continuously watch the Bronco
• Arnelle Simpson testifies that she did not enter through the back door and is questioned about rear-door access and the Rockingham alarm system
• Defense rests after Arnelle Simpson testimony
• Photographer E.J. Flammer authenticates September 1993 photographs that plaintiffs contend show O.J. Simpson in Bruno Magli shoes, but faces pointed cross-examination over Baker's proposed payment figure and inconsistent discovery dates
• Former FBI forensic photography chief Gerald Richards testifies that the Scull photograph showed no evidence of alteration and rebuts defense expert Robert Groden's alteration claims