tense Plaintiffs' rebuttal case begins with photographs allegedly showing O.J. Simpson in Bruno Magli shoes from 1993, but the photographer's credibility is severely attacked for financial motives and timeline inconsistencies. Forensic expert Gerald Richards systematically rebuts defense expert Groden's photo alteration claims through microscopic analysis and precise measurement. The defense rests after testimony questioning police procedures and property access, setting the stage for the expert credibility battle that dominates the day.
- Judge issues limiting instruction on Nicole Brown Simpson's letter regarding state of mind, not truth of contents
- Officer Thompson's vehicle impound report contains errors: battery and alternator marked present despite hood never being opened
- Arnelle Simpson's testimony contradicts police procedures about how she entered the Rockingham property on June 13, 1994
- Defense rests after Arnelle Simpson testimony
- Photographer E.J. Flammer reveals Bruno Magli shoe photographs from September 1993 but faces severe cross-examination on financial motive and timeline inconsistencies
- FBI forensic expert Gerald Richards testifies that photos contain no alterations, directly contradicting defense expert Robert Groden's claims