E.J. Flammer, Your Honor. E.J. FLAMMER, called as a witness on behalf of Plaintiffs, was duly sworn and testified as follows:
You do solemnly swear that the testimony you may give in the cause now pending before this court shall be the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help you God~?
And in addition to your full-time employment there, do you have any other profession that you engage in also?
Now, I want to draw your attention to September 26, 1993. Do you recall where you were on that particular date?
There were two reasons. The first reason was to take pictures for the Monday Morning Quarterback Club as a promotional event that they were having celebrating O.J. Simpson's 2,003 yards, the anniversary of that date. There was a promotional picture to be done before the game. I was also there to shoot the actual game itself for the Buffalo Bills Report.
Now, why you, of any other photographers, why were you hired to take these pictures for the Monday Morning Quarterback Club on this day?
The photos were to be used for publication and just as a general promotion for the event itself, to help sell tickets and things like that.
Now, in what context did you see Mr. Simpson that morning after you arrived there at 10 a.m.?
Under what circumstances did you see Mr. Simpson -- what happened next after you got there and you saw Mr. Simpson?
We were -- I was taken to the field with the other members that are -- that I was to take the pictures with, and Mr. Simpson happened to be walking up towards the press box, and one of the people in the picture --
One of the people in the picture called Mr. Simpson back to the field as he was walking up to the press box.
Yes, I did. There was a time when I set up the shot where -- lined the people up, the people in the picture, you know, did meet Mr. Simpson, talk to him a little bit, shook his hand. They did give him a Monday Morning Quarterback Club pin, which is --
I'm sorry about that. They gave him a Monday Morning Quarterback Club pin for the picture, which some of the other members of the club were wearing at the time.
2320. (The instrument herein described as a Monday Morning Quarterback Club pin was marked for identification as Plaintiffs' Exhibit No. 2320.)
Your Honor, if I could just pass this around while I continue with my questioning also if that's all right.
(BY MR. KELLY) Now, you indicated that you took a number of photographs then with a group of people posing with Mr. Simpson; is that right?
Bill Munson and Dennis Lynch from the Buffalo Bills were in the picture. My father, Ed Flammer, who was the president of the Quarterback Club, Jerry Flashner, and I believe Mike Lacata was the other person in the picture with Mr. Simpson.
They were members of the committee that were chosen to help promote and to organize the dinner -- the dinner celebration that I was taking the picture to promote.
They were not all group photos. The majority of them were group photos, though, but there were three individual shots done as well with Mr. Simpson and one other person.
And what type of camera equipment did you use on that particular day in taking those pictures?
It was a 35 millimeter camera, Canon T90, with a Vivitar 283 flash used to fill in the shadows, I used a 285 F4 zoom lens to shoot this as well on 400 speed film color negative.
Do you still have all that equipment in your possession that you used that day to take those photographs?
Can you just pull it up briefly so the ladies and gentlemen of the jury can see that equipment. (Witness complies, removes camera from bag and displays camera and flash.)
Now, the way you have that equipment set up right now, is that the way you utilized the equipment that day of September 26 of '93 in taking those 30 photos?
For the most part. If there was any change in it at all, it would be the flash may have been tipped up a little bit just to bounce the light to even out a little bit, but other than that...
And what, if anything -- first of all, did you have film in the camera when you started the shooting initially?
The film was loaded in the camera as the shot was being set up, as they say. And after I -- it popped off the first 27 pictures, there was another roll that was loaded in because I had rewound the first roll before the third person had spoken up and said they wanted an individual shot of Mr. Simpson.
Now, when you were done with the first 27 photos, what, if anything, did you do with that roll of film that was in the camera?
The beginning part of the film, which is very common practice for photographers, was torn off, just to indicate that that roll had been -- so it doesn't get reshot during the course of the game. I had a whole Bills game to shoot, which I would probably shoot close to 10 rolls of film.
And after you took those last three photos with Flashner and Mr. Simpson, what, if anything, did you do then?
What I did was kind of turned the camera off and walked into the photographer's locker room and just waited for the game to start.
The same procedure. When the roll was complete, I used up -- the leader was torn off, put into the front part of the fanny pack, and a new roll loaded in.
And what was the -- by the way, up to when that second roll was completed, did you take other rolls of the game that day also?
Now, after the game, did there come a time that you took some further steps with the film, those first two rolls that you utilized that day?
Yes. The rolls were taken to Nova, N-o-v-a, Photo, which is a professional lab that I would normally take my Bills film to on Monday morning for processing.
Yes. I would have taken as requested -- Dennis Lynch from the Bills was to take some 5-by-7's for people in the picture just kind of that -- that you -- just a -- just a memento from that day. There was six 5 by 7's that were made, distributed to Dennis Lynch, that were all color, plus there was a black-and-white print made for publication for the paper, the Buffalo Bills Report, which I was working for.
All right. I should say everything was left as a negative but you only made six prints from all the negatives from the day before?
There was a seventh print made, this was a black-and-white. There were seven; six color, one black-and-white.
Now, with regard to the six prints that were made, what did you do with them subsequently after they were made?
And you also indicated that through the -- a certain connection of yours -- and in making these prints, you were to be paid for this project, were you not?
The first is the invoice, invoice number 2012, which has on it two different items; the first would be the O.J. Simpson six 5-by-7 color prints, the second is another photo that I had taken at a different date.
(BY MR. KELLY) And could you point to the part that describes -- well, first of all, the date up there, does that indicate the date that you generated that invoice?
Okay. And down below, where it says "Description" and it says "5-by-7 Custom Color Prints" --
If you could back off a little bit, Steve. Okay. Take it across, left to right, Steve.
(BY MR. KELLY) Where we have quantity five, and 5-by-7 custom color prints flag wavers, the rate, were those photos taken this day?
(BY MR. KELLY) And you also indicated there in front of you, that you had been paid by the Bills for this job?
(BY MR. KELLY) Is that the stub that had a check attached to it, that was sent to you from the Bills as a result of the invoice submitted?
(BY MR. KELLY) It shows the date. That's the date that that check was issued; is that correct?
(BY MR. KELLY) 10/17, I'm sorry. And 76.45 is the amount you invoiced for that complete set of prints; is that right?
The invoice we marked 2321, and the check stub 2322. (The instrument herein described as an invoice was marked for identification as Plaintiffs' Exhibit No. 2321.) (The instrument herein described as a check stub was marked for identification as Plaintiffs' Exhibit No. 2322.)
(BY MR. KELLY) Now, Mr. Flammer, you indicated that on the 26th of September, '93, you went into Rich Stadium to take these shots; is that correct?
2323. (The instrument herein described as a field credential was marked for identification as Plaintiffs' Exhibit No. 2323.)
(BY MR. KELLY) Now, Mr. Flammer, is that the pass you wore that day that enabled you to get into Rich Stadium to take the photos that we've been speaking of?
Now, in addition to those six prints you indicated you billed the Buffalo Bills for, did you develop or have prints made from any other negatives after that time that you took the photos?
There was one other negative that was developed in black-and-white for the publication for the Buffalo Bills Report.
Okay. And did there come a time that you ever saw -- first of all, what did you do with that black-and-white print after you made it yourself?
The print was made in my darkroom and delivered to the editor of the paper with the other prints from that game and for publication going for the next month.
Did there come a time that you ever saw the reproduction of that black-and-white print that you had made in your darkroom that day?
And did that black-and-white print that you had made yourself, in the basement of your own house, appear in that publication?
And that's the photograph that was generated by you personally, from negative 7-A in the basement of your house?
And did you actually ever have occasion to make a color print from that same frame that appeared in that Bills Report?
I'm almost positive that there was the same frame that was the six 5-by-7's or the five 5-by-7's that were distributed to Denny Lynch.
Going to ask you to look at an exhibit that was marked previously as 2303 and see if you, first of all, recognize what that is?
Does that reflect the negative 75 that was used to make the photograph that appeared in the Bills Report publication?
(BY MR. KELLY) Is that part of the contact sheet of your original negatives 75, that was used to generate the publication, Bills Report?
(BY MR. KELLY) I'm going to ask you to look at these photographs. Now, in looking through those 30 photographs, do you recognize them?
Starting with 2324. (The instruments herein referred to as photos were marked for identification as Plaintiffs' Exhibit No. 2324, 2325, 2326, 2327, 2328, 2329, 2330, 2331, 2332, 2333, 2334, 2335, 2336, 2337, 2338, 2339, 2340, 2341, 2342, 2343, 2344, 2345, 2346, 2347, 2348, 2349, 2350, 2351, 2352, 2353.)
I'll have to mark them one by one, as you go. When you refer to them, just mark the back of them.
Now, Mr. Flammer, you had indicated that on the Monday after the September 26, 1993 game, you had those six prints made, correct?
And did you have any other -- actually, what did you do with all the negatives after you had those six prints made on that Monday after the game?
(BY MR. KELLY) And tell me, when was the next time you had occasion to look at those negatives after that? Was it that Monday you had put them in the three-ring binder in the basement?
And after you looked at those negatives, did you have occasion to have prints made from them?
And when I asked you before when the next time you saw those after 1993, you said December 27. What year was that?
Okay. And, by the way, did you make an affirmative effort to go look for those negatives at this time.
(BY MR. KELLY) Now, was December 30 of 1996 the first time you generated prints from all 30 of those negatives?
First of all, Your Honor, I don't want -- I would object to Mr. Kelly bringing up anything about any expert going into Buffalo or Hamburg and looking at these photos, under 2034 (l) and 2034 (k), because now nothing in either of those sections' requirements, when you want to designate an expert to -- additional expert testimony, not one requirement in either of those code sections has been adhered to, in addition to what I put on the record yesterday. Second of all, I don't think that -- that Mr. Kelly can get out of this witness his self-serving -- whatever he did with this witness. And let me just say, this witness wouldn't talk to us. He wouldn't say one word to us. He says, no, I won't even tell you whether or not Scull's a friend, 'cause you got to talk to Mr. Kelly. So that Mr. Kelly's apparently his lawyer. And I would object to him discussing any conversations and hearsay conversations that took place.
I was -- all I was going to ask him was if he provided me with prints from those negatives on that date, an that was it.
THE COURT: Okay. You may ask that. (The following proceedings were held in open court, in the presence of the jury.)
(BY MR. KELLY) Mr. Flammer, on December 30, did you provide me with some prints that had been generated from those 30 negatives?
Now, in addition to the prints you've provided me on December 30, did you take any steps to market or sell these 30 prints?
Yes. I had hired an agent and spoken to a lawyer, who happens to be a family friend, and is my cousin's husband.
That was the -- I actually didn't sign a formal agreement with him until the evening of the 30th.
I had been advised by my attorney that the three major networks have purchased -- purchased rights to them.
KEY QUOTEBy the way, have you ever been contacted by any representatives of Mr. Simpson's defense team?
Okay. Mr. Flammer, if you could, just look through here. And would you be able to identify the print generated from negative 7A?
(BY MR. KELLY) Is that a print generated from that same negative, 7A, that, again, that you made the black-and-white photo that was used in the Buffalo Bills Report in November of 1993?
(BY MR. KELLY) Mr. Flammer, you indicated that the first thing you did after that shoot that day, on September 26, 1993, was generate negatives; is that correct?
And so, from September 26, 1993, have you maintained custody and control of those negatives?
(BY MR. KELLY) And what are you holding in your hands? If you could, describe each one and hold them up for --
I'm holding two clear file storage -- plastic sleeving, holding the group shots and two of the individual shots with Mr. Simpson on this roll. And this roll over here would be the other three photos, along with some warm-up shots of the Buffalo Bills.
2354. (The instrument herein referred to as Negatives contained in plastic sleeving of photographs taken by Mr. Flammer on September 26, 1993, was marked for identification as Plaintiffs' Exhibit No. 2354.)
(BY MR. KELLY) Looking at that 75, it appears sort of x-ray image on the screen. Is that the negative we've been referring to that generated the black and white that then appeared in the Bills Report?
You have never taken any steps to separate that frame or any frame from your other strips of negatives, have you?
And if you could, just throw the other one up, too, Steve. We'll mark that for identification, also.
2355. (The instrument herein referred to as Negatives contained in plastic sleeving of photographs taken by Mr. Flammer on September 26, 1993, was marked for identification as Plaintiffs' Exhibit No. 2355.)
(BY MR. KELLY) By the way, did you date those plastic pages on the day you took the pictures?
Most of the time. I would, if I wasn't just marking the top of the sleeve or the contents, it was probably a date put on it, as well. That one does happen to be marked.
(BY MR. KELLY) Mr. Flammer, could just identify the people in here one more time. Who's that individual right there (indicating)?
I grew up in Buffalo. O.J. Simpson's a landmark around there.
The negatives were then looked at December 27, 1996.
I had been advised by my attorney that the three major networks have purchased -- purchased rights to them.
This witness wouldn't talk to us. He wouldn't say one word to us. He says, no, I won't even tell you whether or not Scull's a friend, 'cause you got to talk to Mr. Kelly. So that Mr. Kelly's apparently his lawyer.