A brief recross-examination of Kelly Mulldorfer, consisting of a single confirmatory question about whether the witness remembered print dust at the criminal trial. The examination concluded immediately after the witness confirmed the memory, with no further questions from either side.
You're not just remembering now about the print dust; you remembered at the criminal trial, didn't you?
Confirms the witness's memory of print dust was not newly constructed for the civil trial — it was consistent with prior criminal trial testimony.
Mulldorfer
Yes.
Brief but important confirmation of consistency between criminal and civil trial testimony.
Evidence (1)
Informal
Print dust — referenced in context of what the witness remembered during the criminal trial
discussed
Credibility Attacks (1)
⚔ Kelly Mulldorfer
prior consistent statement
Examiner locked in that the witness's recollection of print dust was present at the criminal trial, preempting any suggestion the memory was fabricated or enhanced for the civil proceeding.