📄 Cross-examination of Dr. Robin Cotton (part 5) — Thursday, May 11, 1995
Address:
C:\DEPT103\CRIMINAL\1995\MAY\11\CROSS-EXAMINATION-OF-DR-ROBIN-.DOC
TRIAL
▲ Day 72 of 167

Cross-examination of Dr. Robin Cotton (part 5)

Witness: Dr. Robin Cotton
Examiner: Peter Neufeld
Called by: Prosecution • Date: Thursday, May 11, 1995 • Lines: 74
Peter Neufeld continued cross-examination of Cellmark's Dr. Robin Cotton, focusing on scientific credentials, Cotton's reliance on PCR, and whether forensic use of existing DNA technology introduces reliability challenges. Neufeld also asked whether Nobel laureate and PCR inventor Kary Mullis was a defense expert, and Cotton said she had been told that. The session ended early at Neufeld's request before he began a new subject area.
1 MR. NEUFELD:

One second, your Honor.

2 (Discussion held off the record between Defense counsel.)
3 MR. NEUFELD:

I show you this five-page letter, ask you to take a look at it, please.

4 (Witness complies.)
5 MR. NEUFELD:

Have you had a chance to look at it?

6 DR. COTTON:

Yes, I have.

7 MR. NEUFELD:

Thank you. Now, Dr. Cotton, a moment ago, when you said that there were but a few scientists who criticized the assumption of independence, had you taken into consideration this letter?

8 DR. COTTON:

No, I had not.

9 MR. NEUFELD:

Now that you have--well, have you now considered this letter?

10 MR. CLARKE:

Objection. Hearsay. Irrelevant.

11 THE COURT:

Overruled.

12 DR. COTTON:

I--I would need to reread it. I mean, I didn't carefully read the whole text when you handed it to me just now.

13 THE COURT:

All right. Counsel, given the hour, we're not going to do that now. Proceed.

14 MR. NEUFELD:

Can I make a copy so the witness can do it overnight?

15 THE COURT:

Sure.

16 MR. NEUFELD:

Thank you.

17 THE COURT:

The issue is, did she consider that in the formation of her opinions and testimony.

18 MR. NEUFELD:

Yeah.

19 THE COURT:

So proceed. That's just an observation.

20 MR. NEUFELD:

Now--okay. You mentioned that Cellmark's system was in part developed by research conducted by Alec Jeffries; is that right?

21 DR. COTTON:

Yes.

22 MR. NEUFELD:

And I think you even said on direct examination that he--in response to Mr. Clarke's question, that he had been knighted by the Queen in England for his work?

23 DR. COTTON:

That's correct.

24 MR. NEUFELD:

Well, separate and apart from knighthood, would you agree that the most prestigious award in science is the Nobel Prize?

25 DR. COTTON:

Yes, I would.

26 MR. NEUFELD:

And are you aware of the fact that Dr. Cary Mullis won the Nobel Prize for Chemistry in 1993?

27 DR. COTTON:

Yes, I am.

28 MR. NEUFELD:

And are you aware of the fact that he won that Nobel Prize in Chemistry for inventing the PCR process?

29 DR. COTTON:

Yes, I am.

30 MR. NEUFELD:

And the PCR process that Dr. Cary Mullis invented is the very procedure that you are relying on in your forensic work when you do PCR work; isn't that right?

31 DR. COTTON:

That's correct.

32 MR. NEUFELD:

And are you aware that Dr. Cary Mullis is a Defense --

33 MR. CLARKE:

Excuse me. I'm sorry. Objection. Hearsay.

34 THE COURT:

I didn't hear the full question. Are you aware that he is one of the--he is what?

35 MR. NEUFELD:

One moment.

36 (Discussion held off the record between Defense counsel.)
37 MR. NEUFELD:

Are you aware that Dr. Cary Mullis, who won the Nobel Prize for his discovery of PCR, is one of the Defense experts in this case?

38 MR. CLARKE:

Objection. Assumes facts not in evidence. Irrelevant.

39 THE COURT:

Overruled.

40 DR. COTTON:

I've been told that, yes.

KEY QUOTE
41 MR. NEUFELD:

Now, also on direct examination, Dr. Cotton, you said that many of the techniques that are utilized in forensics have been used in other fields as well; is that right?

42 DR. COTTON:

Yes.

43 MR. NEUFELD:

And I believe that one of the fields that you referred to was clinical medicine; is that right?

44 DR. COTTON:

Well, I probably said medical diagnostics.

45 MR. NEUFELD:

Okay. Well, I actually think that--

46 DR. COTTON:

It's the same term. It's fine.

47 MR. NEUFELD:

Okay. One of the examples you gave I believe was that it's used in bone marrow and organ transplant laboratories?

48 DR. COTTON:

Are you talking about DNA testing in general or PCR?

49 MR. NEUFELD:

PCR testing.

50 DR. COTTON:

It could be used. I don't know if it's being used or not specifically.

51 MR. NEUFELD:

Well, do you know whether or not--in fact--I'm sorry. The DQ-Alpha test that you do, is that part of a cluster of markers known as HLA?

52 DR. COTTON:

Yes, it is.

53 MR. NEUFELD:

And is, to your knowledge, the HLA system also utilized by the laboratories that do bone marrow transplants?

54 DR. COTTON:

This specific test for this specific marker or HLA in general?

55 MR. NEUFELD:

That HLA or the HLA cluster is utilized by--by bone marrow transplant laboratories so they can look for donors, possible donors, type them using DNA typing and then match them with somebody who is in need of a bone marrow transfer?

56 DR. COTTON:

I don't think that most tissue typing, that is looking for matches for transplants, is done by DNA. I didn't mean to specifically use that example. When I--when I referred to bone marrow transplanting, I was referring to following the results of the transplant after it occurred, and DNA RFLP analysis I know is used for that purpose because we have done some of that in our laboratory, and there may be other laboratories that have done that as well.

57 MR. NEUFELD:

Now, you said that--well, that in the forensic context, what you've done is, you've taken this existing technology and you've transferred it to the forensic application. Is that a fair statement?

58 DR. COTTON:

Yes.

59 MR. NEUFELD:

And would you agree that when you transfer an existing technology to a new application, there can be significant differences in its implementation?

60 DR. COTTON:

Well, sure.

61 MR. CLARKE:

Excuse me. Objection. I'll withdraw the objection.

62 MR. NEUFELD:

And would you agree that sometimes the new application can be more difficult and challenging than the original application?

63 MR. CLARKE:

Objection. Vague.

64 THE COURT:

I'll allow it to stand.

65 DR. COTTON:

I'm sure that could be the case.

66 MR. NEUFELD:

And that the new application may present more problems of interpretation which may affect the reliability of the new application?

67 DR. COTTON:

It may present more problems or it could present less problems.

KEY QUOTE
68 MR. NEUFELD:

Now--

69 MR. NEUFELD:

I need the exhibit.

70 (Brief pause.)
71 MR. NEUFELD:

Your Honor, I'm going to go into a new subject, which is going to take a while. Could we stop now?

72 THE COURT:

Sure.

73 MR. NEUFELD:

Okay. Thank you.

74 THE COURT:

All right. Ladies and gentlemen--Dr. Cotton, you can step down. Ladies and gentlemen, we're going to take our recess as far as the jury is concerned at this time. Please remember all of my admonitions to you; don't discuss this case amongst yourselves, don't form any opinions about the case, don't conduct any deliberations until the matter has been submitted to you, don't allow anybody to communicate with you with regard to the case. And we'll stand in recess as far as the jury is concerned until 9:00 o'clock tomorrow morning. And, Dr. Cotton, you are ordered to return tomorrow morning 8:45. All right. All right. Let's clear the jury, then we'll go on to the other motion.

Temperature

tense

Key Quotes (3)

Dr. Robin Cotton
No, I had not.
Cotton admits she had not considered the five-page letter when she earlier said that only 'a few scientists' criticized the assumption of independence.
Dr. Robin Cotton
I've been told that, yes.
After Neufeld asked whether Mullis was one of the defense experts in the case—a contested premise—Cotton said she had been told that, without independently confirming his status.
Dr. Robin Cotton
It may present more problems or it could present less problems.
Cotton resists conceding that forensic application of DNA technology is inherently more difficult or less reliable than clinical applications, a key defense theme.

Evidence (1)

Informal
Five-page letter shown to Dr. Robin Cotton
shown to witness to impeach her claim that only 'a few scientists' criticized the assumption

Notable Exchanges (3)

Peter NeufeldDr. Robin Cotton
Neufeld shows Cotton a five-page letter and elicits that she had not considered it when she earlier said that critics of the independence assumption were few in number.
strategic
Peter NeufeldDr. Robin Cotton
Neufeld elicits that Cotton relies on PCR and understands that Kary Mullis won the Nobel Prize for inventing it, then asks whether Mullis is a defense expert; Cotton says she has been told that.
strategic
Peter NeufeldDr. Robin Cotton
Neufeld presses Cotton on whether bone marrow transplant labs actually use PCR/HLA DNA typing; Cotton walks back her own direct testimony example, clarifying she meant post-transplant monitoring, not donor matching.
revealing

Credibility Attacks (3)

⚔ Dr. Robin Cotton
prior inconsistent statement / omission
Neufeld showed Cotton a five-page letter and elicited that she had not considered it when she earlier said that only a few scientists criticized the assumption of independence.
⚔ Dr. Robin Cotton
impeachment by authority
Neufeld highlighted Cotton's testimony that Kary Mullis won the Nobel Prize for inventing PCR, the procedure she relied on in her forensic PCR work, and then asked whether Mullis was a defense expert; Cotton said she had been told that.
⚔ Dr. Robin Cotton
prior inconsistent statement
Cotton retreated from her own direct-examination example about bone marrow transplant labs using PCR, clarifying she meant post-transplant monitoring rather than donor typing — narrowing the analogy she had used to bolster forensic DNA reliability.

Objections

6 objections (0 sustained, 2 overruled)
Proceeding 6023 • 74 lines • Prosecution witness
Criminal Trial
Department 103
📂 MAY 11, 1995 📄 Cross-examination of Dr. Robin
MAY 11, 1995