WE ARE OVER HERE AT THE SIDEBAR. THIS APPEARS TO BE A PHOTOGRAPH OF WHAT APPEARS TO ME TO BE THE ENVELOPE.
AND THE PROBLEM IS THAT IN THIS PHOTOGRAPH, IT IS NOT IN THE CONDITION IN WHICH THEY FOUND IT. THIS IS A CRIMINALIST PHOTOGRAPH. SO IT WAS STRETCHED OUT AND FLATTENED FOR THE PURPOSE OF DOCUMENTING CERTAIN ASPECTS OF THE BLOOD PATTERN AND SHOWING WHERE THEY SAMPLED BLOOD. IT'S NOT GOING TO BE RELEVANT TO THIS WITNESS' TESTIMONY BECAUSE HE IS NOT A CRIMINALIST. HE WASN'T PRESENT WHEN THE PHOTOGRAPH WAS TAKEN AND HE CAN'T TESTIFY TO HOW IT CAME TO BE IN THIS CONDITION OR HOW IT COMPARES TO THE WAY HE SAW IT. THERE'S JUST NO RELEVANCE TO IT AND IT WOULD CALL FOR SPECULATION.
I ASKED YOUR HONOR'S CLERK FOR THE ENVELOPE. I'M GOING TO ASK HIM HOW HE LOOKED INSIDE THE ENVELOPE. THAT'S WHAT I WANT IT FOR. THE ENVELOPE ISN'T HERE. HOW CAN I MAKE THE DETERMINATION? THAT'S ALL I HAVE.
THE ENVELOPE ISN'T HERE. WHY DO YOU THINK I'M SEEKING TO USE THIS? WHY DO YOU KEEP LYING ON THE RECORD?
KEY QUOTEWAIT, WAIT, WAIT. THANK YOU. THE ENVELOPE IS IN EVIDENCE. HOWEVER, IF YOU RECALL, WE AGREED TO RELEASE CERTAIN ITEMS OF EVIDENCE FOR TESTING BACK TO LAPD SID. THAT'S WHERE IT IS. THIS MORNING.
DO ME A HUGE FAVOR TOO. WHEN I SAY WAIT, IT MEANS LIKE WE'RE IN A WRESTLING MATCH WHEN THE REFEREE SAYS BREAK.
KEY QUOTEI WAS NOT AWARE IT HAD BEEN RELEASED FROM EVIDENCE BECAUSE I REMEMBER MARKING IT. THE PROBLEM WITH THIS PHOTOGRAPH IS, WE DON'T KNOW WHEN IT WAS TAKEN. IT'S OBVIOUSLY NOT IN THE CONDITION IN WHICH IT WAS FOUND BECAUSE THE COURT SAW THE ENVELOPE WHEN WE MARKED IT AND THE WITNESS TESTIFIED TO THE MANNER IN WHICH HE SAW IT. THIS IS IRRELEVANT TO ANY IMPEACHMENT OF THIS WITNESS BECAUSE IT'S BEEN ALTERED FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE CRIMINALIST TAKING THE PHOTOGRAPH. I DON'T KNOW WHO TOOK IT. I DON'T KNOW WHEN IT WAS TAKEN. I DON'T KNOW WHAT WAS DONE TO IT TO PUT IT IN THIS POSITION.
THIS IS THE FBI, AND I ASSUME IT'S BECAUSE OF WHAT APPEARS TO BE MAYBE POSSIBLY FOOTPRINTS ON IT.
IT MAY VERY WELL BE. BUT WHAT DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH THIS WITNESS' KNOWLEDGE? IT'S NOT IMPEACHING OF THIS WITNESS BECAUSE SOMEONE ELSE HAS ALTERED IT.
INTERESTINGLY -- THIS IS FOR IMPEACHMENT. I'M TRYING TO ASK HIM WHAT HE LOOKED AT -- HOW HE LOOKED AT IT. AND IF HE SAYS -- THIS IS A PHOTOGRAPH WE GOT I PRESUME FROM THEM. I JUST WANT TO ASK HIM WHETHER OR NOT HE CAN LOOK AT THAT AND SHOW US AND TELL US WHERE HE LOOKED. HE SAID HE LOOKED IN THE ENVELOPE. I'M TRYING TO FIND OUT --
LET ME ASK, DON'T WE HAVE A CLOSE-UP PHOTOGRAPH OF THIS THING AT THE CRIME SCENE WHERE YOU CAN LOOK AT IT?
THE ONE THAT YOU NEED TO LOOK AT IS PROBABLY THIS ONE HERE (INDICATING) BECAUSE THIS IS BEFORE IT'S MOVED. THIS IS AFTER THE CRIMINALIST HAS MOVED IT. IT'S BEEN MOVED. SO PROBABLY PEOPLE'S 104 IS THE ONE WE NEED TO TALK ABOUT HERE.
WE CAN PUT IT ON THE ELMO, WHATEVER. I JUST WANT TO ASK HIM SOME QUESTIONS ABOUT HOW HE PEERED INTO IT. THIS IS THE ONE AFTER IT'S BEEN MOVED, YOUR HONOR?
THAT'S THE ONE BEFORE AFTER THE CORONER TOOK -- YOUR HONOR, I DON'T HAVE THESE PICTURES.
PROBABLY ONE OF THE THINGS CARL BROUGHT THAT HE PROBABLY GOT FROM BOB BLASIER. THIS MAY BE EXPERT STUFF.
WHAT HAPPENED, I GOT -- YOU GOT MY CALL LATE FRIDAY NIGHT I'M SURE. I GOT ANOTHER PACKAGE OF STUFF FROM THE FBI, THAT HE LEFT A MESSAGE AND I THINK SCHECK CAME AND CHECKED IT OUT FIRST. THAT'S PROBABLY WHAT THAT IS.
TO TELL YOU THE TRUTH, I DIDN'T LOOK AT THE PHOTOGRAPHS. I THINK THAT'S ONE OF THEM. I'M NOT CERTAIN THOUGH.
THE ENVELOPE ISN'T HERE. WHY DO YOU THINK I'M SEEKING TO USE THIS? WHY DO YOU KEEP LYING ON THE RECORD?
DON'T YOU DARE SAY THAT TO ME AGAIN, COUNSEL, USE THAT WORD.
DO ME A HUGE FAVOR TOO. WHEN I SAY WAIT, IT MEANS LIKE WE'RE IN A WRESTLING MATCH WHEN THE REFEREE SAYS BREAK.
SO THE DEFENSE HAS ALL THIS PACKAGE OF PHOTOGRAPHS WE DON'T HAVE?