Shapiro cross-examines Kato Kaelin about OJ Simpson inviting Kaelin and his young daughter to a Pediatric AIDS charity event, attempting to establish OJ as a caring, family-oriented man. Clark objects repeatedly to relevance, but is overruled. The excerpt ends mid-line as Shapiro pivots to ask whether OJ shared the same desire to spend time with his children.
# 1 (THE FOLLOWING PROCEEDINGS WERE HELD IN OPEN COURT:) # 2 THE COURT: ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, COUNSEL. YOU MAY CONTINUE.
# 3 Q: BY MR. SHAPIRO: AND FOR THE PEDIATRIC AIDS --
# 4 MS. CLARK: OBJECTION, YOUR HONOR. WE JUST TALKED ABOUT THIS.
# 5 THE COURT: AT THIS POINT FINISH THE QUESTION.
# 6 Q: BY MR. SHAPIRO: FOR THE PEDIATRIC AIDS, O.J. INVITED YOU AND YOUR DAUGHTER TO COME?
# 10 Q: HOW OLD IS YOUR DAUGHTER?
# 11 MS. CLARK: OBJECTION, YOUR HONOR. WHAT IS THE RELEVANCE?
# 12 THE COURT: OVERRULED.
# 13 Q: BY MR. SHAPIRO: HOW OLD IS YOUR DAUGHTER?
# 14 A: SHE WAS NINE AT THE TIME.
# 15 Q: DOES SHE LIVE WITH YOU?
# 17 Q: I TAKE IT THAT WHEN YOU GET A CHANCE TO BE AROUND YOUR DAUGHTER THAT YOU LIKE TO SPEND AS MUCH TIME WITH HER AS YOU CAN?
# 19 MS. CLARK: YOUR HONOR, OBJECTION, RELEVANCE.
# 20 Q: BY MR. SHAPIRO: AND WOULD YOU SAY --
# 21 MR. SHAPIRO: FOUNDATIONAL.
# 22 Q: WOULD YOU SAY THAT IS THE SAME FOR O.J.?
KEY QUOTE # 23 THE COURT: OVERRULED.
# 24 MS. CLARK: ASK FOR AN OFFER OF PROOF.
KEY QUOTE