ALL RIGHT. GOOD MORNING, COUNSEL. ALL RIGHT. BACK ON THE RECORD IN THE SIMPSON MATTER. THE DEFENDANT IS AGAIN PRESENT BEFORE THE COURT WITH HIS COUNSEL, MR. SHAPIRO, MR. COCHRAN, MR. DOUGLAS, MR. BAILEY. THE PEOPLE ARE REPRESENTED BY MISS CLARK, MR. DARDEN, MISS LEWIS. THE JURY IS NOT PRESENT. COUNSEL, IS THERE ANYTHING WE NEED TO TAKE UP BEFORE WE INVITE THE JURORS TO JOIN US?
LAST NIGHT ON THE NEWS MR. BAILEY WAS SEEN REFERRING -- AND WAS HEARD REFERRING TO A FEMALE DEFENSE WITNESS WHO HE CLAIMED WAS UNKNOWN TO THE PROSECUTION AND WHO HE CLAIMED WOULD BE A SURPRISE TO THE PROSECUTION, AND IT SOUNDED CLEAR THAT THIS IS SOMEBODY THAT THE DEFENSE INTENDS TO CALL AT TRIAL. BY MR. BAILEY'S OWN WORDS THIS IS SOMEONE THEY HAD FAILED TO REVEAL IN RECIPROCAL DISCOVERY, SO THIS SEEMS AN APPROPRIATE TIME, SINCE A DECISION HAD NOT BEEN MADE BY LAST NIGHT, IT CERTAINLY WAS MADE BY THE TIME MR. BAILEY ANNOUNCED IT TO THE WORLD THROUGH THE PRESS THAT THEY HAVE AN ADDITIONAL WITNESS THAT THEY INTEND TO CALL, SO I WOULD ASK THE COURT TO ORDER THE DEFENSE TO DISCLOSE THE NAME AND ADDRESS AND THE STATEMENT OF THIS WITNESS, WHOEVER IT IS.
I THINK IT IS A MATTER FOR A PROFFER. THE WITNESS IS NOT -- THIS WITNESS DENIES THE INCIDENT. IF HE DENIES THE INCIDENT, THERE WON'T BE ANY NEED TO CALL ANY WITNESS, BUT THE PROFFER THAT I AM SUBMITTING TO THE COURT, PURSUANT TO OUR LAST VISIT TO THIS SUBJECT, CONTAINS THE INFORMATION AND I THINK WHEN YOUR HONOR LOOKS AT IT AND LOOKS AT ANOTHER DOCUMENT, YOU WILL BE QUITE SATISFIED THAT THE RULES HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH. I WILL BE GLAD TO SUBMIT THAT AND LET YOUR HONOR LOOK AT IT NOW AND WE CAN CONFER IN CAMERA AND I WILL EXPLAIN TO YOU WHAT I MEAN.
WELL, THE CAT IS OUT OF THE BAG AGAIN. I DON'T THINK MR. BAILEY ACTION NOUNS TO THE WORLD LAST NIGHT, WHICH INCLUDES ANNOUNCING TO THE PROSECUTION, ABOUT THIS WITNESS AND THEN SEEK TO INSULATE THE WITNESS FROM DISCOVERY BY SAYING, WELL, WE WILL LET THE COURT HANDLE IT.
KEY QUOTEMISS LEWIS, WHAT WAS THE SPECIFIC COMMENT THAT WAS MADE? I DID NOT SEE THAT. I AM NOT AWARE OF ANYTHING THAT WAS SAID REGARDING THIS.
UNFORTUNATELY, I DIDN'T ACTUALLY SEE IT MYSELF, BUT I HAVE A SCRIPT OF IT, WHICH I'M TOLD IS ACCURATE.
ACTUALLY. "IT IS A WIRE REPORT QUOTING MR. BAILEY SAYING: HE, MR. BAILEY, CLAIMS THERE IS ANOTHER WOMAN FUHRMAN DID NOT KNOW WAS PRESENT WHEN HE WAS TOGETHER WITH BELL ON A SEPARATE OCCASION. BAILEY WOULD NOT ELABORATE ON THE MYSTERY WITNESS," AND THAT WAS ABOUT ALL IN THIS ONE. I THINK HE WAS -- I KNOW HE WAS MORE SPECIFIC IN TERMS OF THE GENDER BECAUSE HE DESCRIBED IT AS A FEMALE WITNESS DURING THE PRESS CONFERENCE THAT HE GAVE AFTER COURT YESTERDAY.
ALL RIGHT. MR. BAILEY, ARE YOU WILLING TO MAKE A DISCLOSURE TO THE COURT, 1054.7 IN CAMERA? ALL RIGHT. THEN I WILL ASK -- I ANTICIPATE THAT WE WILL BE ON DIRECT EXAMINATION FOR THE ENTIRE MORNING SESSION WITH DETECTIVE FUHRMAN AND MISS CLARK, SO I DON'T THINK THAT WE WILL BE GETTING ANYWHERE CLOSE TO CROSS-EXAMINATION AT THIS POINT.
YOUR HONOR, IF IT IS DISCOVERABLE NOW, WE WANT IT NOW. IT MAY AFFECT OUR DIRECT EXAMINATION OF DETECTIVE FUHRMAN. IT COULD WELL HAVE AN IMPACT, OR MAYBE NOT, BUT THAT IS SOMETHING THAT WE NEED TO DO, AND SINCE IT APPEARS TO BE DISCOVERABLE NOW, IT APPEARS TO BE A SLENDER ENVELOPE, IT DOESN'T LOOK LIKE IT WOULD TAKE A CONSIDERABLE TIME TO LOOK AT IT, WE WOULD REQUEST THE COURT TO CONDUCT AN IN CAMERA HEARING NOW, PLEASE.
ALL RIGHT. I'M GOING TO DECLINE THAT INVITATION. MR. BAILEY, IF YOU WILL FILE THAT WITH MRS. ROBERTSON AND WE WILL TAKE A LOOK AT IT DURING THE FIRST BREAK.
SECONDLY, COUNSEL, I HAVE RECEIVED A FAX FROM PATRICIA BERMAN REGARDING THE RECURRING ICE CREAM ISSUE. I HAVE GIVEN COUNSEL A COPY OF BOTH OF THOSE. I HAVE ALSO RECEIVED ADDITIONAL TESTING RESULTS FROM CELLMARK AND FROM LAPD REGARDING FINGERPRINT AND OTHER ANALYSIS THAT WERE DONE, AND MISS CARSWELL, IS MAKING PHOTOCOPIES OF THOSE RIGHT NOW AND YOU WILL BE PROVIDED WITH THOSE AT THE FIRST BREAK. ALL RIGHT. ANYTHING ELSE? ALL RIGHT. DEPUTY MAGNERA, LET'S HAVE THE JURORS, PLEASE.
THE CAT IS OUT OF THE BAG AGAIN. I DON'T THINK MR. BAILEY ACTION NOUNS TO THE WORLD LAST NIGHT, WHICH INCLUDES ANNOUNCING TO THE PROSECUTION, ABOUT THIS WITNESS AND THEN SEEK TO INSULATE THE WITNESS FROM DISCOVERY BY SAYING, WELL, WE WILL LET THE COURT HANDLE IT.
HE CLAIMS THERE IS ANOTHER WOMAN FUHRMAN DID NOT KNOW WAS PRESENT WHEN HE WAS TOGETHER WITH BELL ON A SEPARATE OCCASION. BAILEY WOULD NOT ELABORATE ON THE MYSTERY WITNESS.
THE WITNESS IS NOT -- THIS WITNESS DENIES THE INCIDENT. IF HE DENIES THE INCIDENT, THERE WON'T BE ANY NEED TO CALL ANY WITNESS.
IT MAY AFFECT OUR DIRECT EXAMINATION OF DETECTIVE FUHRMAN. IT COULD WELL HAVE AN IMPACT, OR MAYBE NOT, BUT THAT IS SOMETHING THAT WE NEED TO DO.