If it please the Court, it seems to resemble the image that we saw yesterday in conjunction with the Bronco carpet report which report you have excluded. I'm wondering how far the Prosecution is allowed to go with these exhibits and what is going to be said about them.
It was my understanding of the Court's ruling that we were allowed to use photographs and it is going no farther than Mr. Deedrick explaining here is an example of a `91 fiber, here is an example of a `92 fiber. He is just going to show the difference in the cross-sections. That is all.
Well, I'm going to allow this photograph right now just because it is an example of an electron microscope photograph of a fiber, of a synthetic fiber. We will take up that issue later.
KEY QUOTEI thought that the Court permitted the use of the photographs. I'm not going to tie it into the report.
I have a photograph of a `92 as well. Neither one of those goes to `94. We are not at that point yet. These are just instructional right now. I thought the Court already ruled that yesterday.
One other matter, your Honor. Will you instruct the Miss Clark to tell the witness please don't use the word "Match" any more.
He is just going to show the difference in the cross-sections. That is all.
I'm going to allow this photograph right now just because it is an example of an electron microscope photograph of a fiber, of a synthetic fiber. We will take up that issue later.
Will you instruct the Miss Clark to tell the witness please don't use the word 'Match' any more.
No, we are not even close to that, guys.