We're over at sidebar. Mr. Neufeld, I think the only issue that the NRC report is germane to at this point is the method of calculations regarding mixtures. I allowed you to cross-examine on that issue, but to go on into the whole controversy regarding the NRC report, I'm going to sustain a 352 objection because it's way overboard.
I think he on direct examination did or did not specifically testify to mixtures, but as you may recall, he testified as to independence which allows him to utilize the product rule for all the single donor stains.
That's--this question is about independence. This is the point which I think he disagrees with and which I'm trying to get to now to show--I'm trying to use this to show his bias, and I think I'm entitled to ask him about his bias, your Honor. This is the part, just for that purpose.
No. The issue here is the determination of mixtures. Other witnesses have testified to the other databases. You had plenty of opportunity to cross-examine on those issues. To go after him using this hearsay at this point goes way beyond what we need to have here. It's a waste of our time. You can go into issues regarding mixture, but all this other stuff in the NRC report--we're not going to debate the NRC report.
I'm not going to debate the report. But I'm trying to bring out these things to show the biases he has. This--you know, it's a logical reaction to everything in this NRC report or to most of what's in the NRC report. I want to ask for bias purposes.
To go on into the whole controversy regarding the NRC report, I'm going to sustain a 352 objection because it's way overboard.
I'm trying to use this to show his bias, and I think I'm entitled to ask him about his bias, your Honor.
You're sanctioned $250 for keeping your voice up.
It's a waste of our time. You can go into issues regarding mixture, but all this other stuff in the NRC report — we're not going to debate the NRC report.