📄 Audiotape stipulation, motion scheduling, and file review — Wednesday, June 14, 1995
Address:
C:\DEPT103\CRIMINAL\1995\JUN\14\AUDIOTAPE-STIPULATION-MOTION-S.DOC
TRIAL
▲ Day 95 of 167

Audiotape stipulation, motion scheduling, and file review

Date: Wednesday, June 14, 1995 • Utterances: 41
The court handles several administrative matters before resuming jury proceedings: a stipulation allowing audiotape playback without court reporter transcription, a prosecution request to delay a Friday defense motion hearing due to last-minute amendments, and a dispute over whether a document in the DA's file contradicts Dr. Golden's autopsy report. Shapiro claims he found an inconsistent statement in the file; Kelberg argues the document is an internal special circumstances memo unrelated to what Shapiro is seeking.
1 (The following proceedings were held in open court, out of the presence of the jury:)
2 THE COURT:

All right. Back on the record in the Simpson matter. All parties are again present without the jury. Counsel, two things. Normally, I ask for a stipulation before we play an audiotape, and I had forgotten to do that, a stipulation that the court reporter need not attempt to take down what is on the tape. Could I get a stipulation on this matter? Did we lose Mr. Shapiro? There he is.

3 MR. SHAPIRO:

We'll stipulate.

4 THE COURT:

Mr. Kelberg?

5 MR. KELBERG:

Certainly, your Honor.

6 THE COURT:

Also, the policy of this Court is to require transcripts of any audiotapes that are played for the jury. So I'm going to direct the Prosecution to file with the Court by close of business Friday a transcript of the portion of the tape that was played to the jury, but that should not be too difficult.

7 MR. KELBERG:

Your Honor, is there any need to provide a transcript of any portion other than that paragraph?

8 THE COURT:

No. Just the portion that was played to the jury.

9 MR. KELBERG:

All right.

10 THE COURT:

All right. Mr. Bailey, are you standing for a reason?

11 MR. BAILEY:

No, your Honor. I'm preparing to split.

KEY QUOTE
12 THE COURT:

Good to see you again. Miss Clark.

13 MS. CLARK:

I am standing for a reason, your Honor. Just minutes ago, we were given the amended motion of the Defense which now adds conceivably to the original motion filed.

14 THE COURT:

The one that's set for Friday afternoon?

15 MS. CLARK:

That's correct, your Honor. In light of the fact that they have still not given us the completed motion--this is an amended motion. They intend to amend it again with declarations, but not until tomorrow. And due to the fact that both Mr. Darden and myself will be presenting witnesses after the completion of the Coroner's testimony, I'm going to ask the Court to put over the hearing on this motion so that we are given time to respond to it and to absorb the additions to it that are being made at the last minute.

16 THE COURT:

Well, let's see what the declarations are before we make that determination, keeping in mind that I also have to read these things and do the research and read the responses.

17 MS. CLARK:

Correct. I mean, we have to be able to read the declarations and perhaps respond in writing to them with our own declarations. So I mean--

18 THE COURT:

All right. I'm not going to make a determination about continuing that hearing. I would like to get that on and off as soon as possible. So let's see what's filed. If it is something extensive, perhaps I will agree with your position. If it is not extensive and can be dealt with in a rather quick fashion, I think we should do so. Okay. But let's see what's filed, okay? All right.

19 MR. KELBERG:

Your Honor, I have looked through the materials from the box from the District Attorney's office concerning this incident. I found nothing that correlated with the type of information Mr. Shapiro was seeking. Mr. Grace, obviously from what information he's provided to both Mr. Shapiro and me, has given no indication that such a document exists. Mr. Shapiro, we've given access to the District Attorney file with Mr. Grace standing next to him to confirm for himself what is there. I hate to keep Mr. Grace, but I do have a motion. If Mr. Shapiro intends to get into this area--because the bottom line is, there's nothing there. And not only is there nothing there, but there's also the issue of the admissibility, even the circumstances of the legal outcome separate and apart from the medical issue of significance.

20 MR. SHAPIRO:

We respectfully disagree that there's nothing there. I just went through the entire--through part of the file very, very quickly, and we find a statement here that is inconsistent with the correction of the autopsy report by Dr. Golden.

KEY QUOTE
21 MR. KELBERG:

And this document is a document which is an internal memorandum, recommendation and appraisal of special circumstances. What Mr. Shapiro is seeking is information that was sent to the Coroner's office and to the attention of any individual at the Coroner's office. That is not what this is.

22 THE COURT:

Sounds like a special circumstances memo.

23 MR. KELBERG:

It is an amendment, if you will, summarizing the change in circumstances, your Honor. And again, I--my belief is, this is a matter that should be handled in other than the public eye. We have given Mr. Shapiro unprecedented access to look through our file without any claims of privilege so he can verify for himself. But Mr. Grace has personally told us that no such document exists.

24 MR. SHAPIRO:

Well, I think there's additional information here beyond what Dr. Lakshmanan has testified to regarding the findings of Dr. Golden and the significance, and I will read them into the record if you like or I will offer them at sidebar if you like.

25 THE COURT:

All right. How about we do that at sidebar first to see what it is--

26 MR. SHAPIRO:

I think that's proper.

27 THE COURT:

--when we get to that.

28 MR. SHAPIRO:

Yes.

29 THE COURT:

Have you had enough time, Mr. Shapiro, to peruse the file in that matter?

30 MR. SHAPIRO:

Yes, I have, your Honor.

31 THE COURT:

All right. Are you ready to proceed?

32 MR. SHAPIRO:

Yes. We're ready. May we get copies of these, your Honor, or just have Mr. Grace hold these?

33 THE COURT:

All right. Mrs. Robertson, would you have one of the staff members make copies for me.

34 MR. KELBERG:

And, your Honor, Mr. Grace has kindly consented to sticking around for the rest of the afternoon in the event we get to this.

35 THE COURT:

And I take it, Mr. Shapiro, Mr. Grace is going to remain in case there's any other questions?

36 MR. SHAPIRO:

Thank you. We appreciate that.

37 MR. KELBERG:

And I assume Mr. Shapiro will not inquire. I will finish very shortly.

38 THE COURT:

Yes, you will.

39 MR. KELBERG:

I know. I understand, your Honor. But I do understand also that Mr. Shapiro will not ask any questions regarding this matter until there has been a determination by the Court.

40 THE COURT:

He'll ask to approach at the time we get to that portion in cross-examination. All right. Let's have the jurors, please. And, counsel, we're going to 5:00 o'clock today. And, Mr. Shapiro, will you require some time to change over for cross-examination?

41 MR. SHAPIRO:

No, your Honor. We're ready.

Temperature

procedural

Key Quotes (3)

F. Lee Bailey
No, your Honor. I'm preparing to split.
Rare light moment — Bailey casually announcing his departure to the judge.
Robert Shapiro
We respectfully disagree that there's nothing there. I just went through the entire--through part of the file very, very quickly, and we find a statement here that is inconsistent with the correction of the autopsy report by Dr. Golden.
Shapiro claims to have found a document inconsistency with Golden's corrected autopsy findings, setting up a potential challenge to coroner testimony.
Brian Kelberg
We have given Mr. Shapiro unprecedented access to look through our file without any claims of privilege so he can verify for himself. But Mr. Grace has personally told us that no such document exists.
Prosecution asserting transparency while disputing the document's relevance and existence for Shapiro's purposes.

Evidence (3)

Informal
Audiotape previously played to the jury, requiring a court transcript of the played portion
discussed, transcript ordered
Informal
Internal memorandum — 'recommendation and appraisal of special circumstances' from the DA's file
disputed — Shapiro claims it contradicts Dr. Golden's corrected autopsy report; Kelberg says it is not the document Shapiro is looking for
Informal
Amended defense motion set for Friday hearing, with additional declarations still pending
discussed, continuance requested by prosecution

Notable Exchanges (2)

Brian KelbergRobert Shapiro
Dispute over whether a document in the DA's file contradicts Dr. Golden's autopsy correction. Kelberg says nothing relevant exists; Shapiro says he found an inconsistent statement and offers to read it into the record or present at sidebar. Judge opts for sidebar.
strategic
Marcia ClarkLance A. Ito
Clark requests a continuance of the Friday motion hearing because the defense filed an amended motion and plans further amendments with declarations. Ito declines to rule immediately, preferring to see what is filed first.
procedural

Light Moments (1)

F. Lee Bailey
F. Lee Bailey tells the judge he is standing because he is 'preparing to split,' prompting Ito to reply 'Good to see you again.'

Credibility Attacks (1)

⚔ Dr. Golden
prior inconsistent statement (document)
Shapiro claims a document in the DA's file is inconsistent with the correction Dr. Golden made to his autopsy report, though the court defers ruling until sidebar.

Objections

None recorded
Proceeding 6370 • 41 utterances
Criminal Trial
Department 103
⚖️ Start
📂 JUN 14, 1995 📄 Audiotape stipulation, motion
JUN 14, 1995 KRT DvH TD