Your Honor, I hear remarks from the peanut gallery. I couldn't hear what was said. But your Honor, with regard to this, we spoke with our client after the interview, and we are in the process of trying to reach Professor Dershowitz and Dean Uelmen, but at minimal at this point, after talking with our client, we would request that we would like to have the Court get the first letter received by the juror from 353 to 1290, and we would like to see the contents of that letter because I think we are in a situation in this case where we will make another mistake, but at least seeing what the contents are. And we are going to specifically request that that letter--we need to see the contents of the letter specifically because there were messages to each and every juror or to several of the jurors, apparently.
For that reason I thought we should do that, and as to anything else, we will give back to the Court. May I have just a second?
The second thing we would ask, your Honor, would be that we get some kind of a declaration or something where we be privy to talk to the sheriff's deputies who read the second letter so we can get the content.
We would like--another thing, we would like, if at all possible, to get an expedited copy of the proceedings there and we will keep it under seal and give it to our lawyers--of the proceedings this morning so that we can share them with Professor Dershowitz and Dean Uelmen.
No. I will at an appropriate time today ask 1290 to give the letter--the physical letter to the sheriffs, and I already have the sheriff's department interviewing the deputies who are involved in the other matters because I want to know what the content of the letter was.
KEY QUOTEwe would request that we would like to have the Court get the first letter received by the juror from 353 to 1290, and we would like to see the contents of that letter because I think we are in a situation in this case where we will make another mistake
No. I will at an appropriate time today ask 1290 to give the letter--the physical letter to the sheriffs, and I already have the sheriff's department interviewing the deputies who are involved in the other matters because I want to know what the content of the letter was.
Is that--I mean, we get each of the things we asked for?