Cochran conducts a brief further redirect to clarify two points: that Meraz saw the white Bronco on June 15th — not June 14th, the date of a photograph shown during cross — and that other Viertel's drivers also visited the print shed, not just Meraz. The examination wraps in under a dozen exchanges and Meraz is excused.
# 1 MR. COCHRAN: One last question.
FURTHER REDIRECT EXAMINATION BY MR. COCHRAN
# 2 MR. COCHRAN: Now, with regard to this photograph counsel was asking you about, that photograph was allegedly taken on the 14th of June. You didn't see that white Bronco on the 14th; is that correct? You didn't see the white Bronco on June 14th, 1994, did you?
# 3 MR. MERAZ: No. I didn't see it on the 14th.
KEY QUOTE # 4 MR. COCHRAN: You saw it on the 15th; is that correct?
# 5 MR. MERAZ: That's correct.
# 6 MR. COCHRAN: All you can tell Miss Clark and this jury is how it appeared to you on June 15th; is that correct?
KEY QUOTE # 7 MR. MERAZ: That's correct.
# 8 MR. COCHRAN: And with regard to this garage being an OPG, are the other drivers--Viertel's have other drivers who also came to the print shed, not shack?
# 9 MR. MERAZ: Through the years, yes.
# 10 MR. COCHRAN: All right. And with regard to that, you weren't the only one that went there; is that correct?
# 11 MR. MERAZ: This is true.
# 12 MR. COCHRAN: All right. I have nothing further.
# 13 THE COURT: Miss Clark.
# 14 MS. CLARK: Nothing further, your Honor.
# 15 THE COURT: All right. Mr. Meraz, thank you very much, sir. You are excused. Next witness.
# 16 MR. COCHRAN: Thank you very kindly, your Honor.