📄 Sidebar: phone call identification — Thursday, July 13, 1995
Address:
C:\DEPT103\CRIMINAL\1995\JUL\13\SIDEBAR-PHONE-CALL-IDENTIFICAT.DOC
TRIAL
▲ Day 114 of 167

Sidebar: phone call identification

Date: Thursday, July 13, 1995 • Utterances: 27
The defense objected to testimony identifying who a phone call was made to, arguing hearsay and lack of foundation. Clark revealed the call was to 'Skip' — Skip Taft, Simpson's lawyer — and Ito overruled the objection, ruling it admissible as a party admission.
1 (The following proceedings were held at the bench:)
2 THE COURT:

Off the record.

3 (A discussion was held at the bench, not reported.)
4 MR. COCHRAN:

I objected, your Honor. I think that this is still hearsay, and he can't tell who the call was to I don't think.

5 MS. CLARK:

Yes, he can.

6 MR. COCHRAN:

Maybe he can, maybe he can't.

7 MS. CLARK:

He can. Let me tell the Court. He indicates the first call was to someone named Skip.

8 THE COURT:

Okay.

9 MR. COCHRAN:

So?

10 MS. CLARK:

As in Taft.

11 THE COURT:

Okay.

12 MS. CLARK:

His lawyer.

13 THE COURT:

Okay.

14 MS. CLARK:

That's it.

15 THE COURT:

The problem--let me ask you this though.

16 MR. SHAPIRO:

No.

17 THE COURT:

All right. Okay. It is--and your objection is hearsay?

18 MR. COCHRAN:

Well, yeah. Hearsay. Also, in addition to that, you know, no proper foundation for this. How does he know who it is?

19 MS. CLARK:

He heard it. All he is going to--

20 MR. COCHRAN:

How did it get to Bob before the jury?

21 THE COURT:

Johnnie, you were this close, if he had a phone record.

KEY QUOTE
22 MR. COCHRAN:

We want to get closer. We're going to get closer. I understand you left the door open. I understand that. So we're having--

23 THE COURT:

I can't make it any plainer than that, can I?

24 MR. COCHRAN:

No. I'm not quarreling with that.

25 THE COURT:

All right. Let's go. It is an admission.

KEY QUOTE
26 MR. COCHRAN:

Skip?

27 THE COURT:

Yeah.

Temperature

procedural

Key Quotes (4)

Marcia Clark
He indicates the first call was to someone named Skip. As in Taft. His lawyer.
Identifies the subject of the contested testimony — a call from Simpson to his own attorney, which Clark frames as an admission.
Lance A. Ito
Johnnie, you were this close, if he had a phone record.
Ito signals how the defense could have blocked this evidence — with a phone record — implying they missed a strategic opportunity.
Lance A. Ito
All right. Let's go. It is an admission.
Final ruling: the testimony comes in under the party admission exception to hearsay.
Johnnie Cochran
Skip?
Cochran's surprised, single-word reaction to the ruling reveals he may not have anticipated this specific framing.

Evidence (1)

Informal
Phone call from Simpson to 'Skip' Taft, his lawyer
discussed, admitted as party admission over defense objection

Notable Exchanges (2)

Lance A. ItoJohnnie Cochran
Ito tells Cochran the defense was 'this close' to blocking the evidence if they had produced a phone record, essentially giving the defense a tutorial on how to fight it next time.
strategic
Marcia ClarkJohnnie Cochran
Clark methodically reveals the identity of the call recipient — Skip, Taft, his lawyer — in three short beats, cutting off Cochran's 'so what' posture.
strategic

Light Moments (1)

Johnnie Cochran
Cochran's clipped 'Skip?' at the end of the ruling — equal parts disbelief and dark humor — gets the last word.

Objections

1 objections (0 sustained, 1 overruled)
Proceeding 6841 • 27 utterances
Criminal Trial
Department 103
⚖️ Start
📂 JUL 13, 1995 📄 Sidebar: phone call identifica
JUL 13, 1995 KRT DvH TD