ALL RIGHT. BACK ON THE RECORD IN THE SIMPSON MATTER. MR. SIMPSON IS AGAIN PRESENT BEFORE THE COURT WITH HIS COUNSEL, MR. SHAPIRO, MR. UELMEN, MR. COCHRAN, MR. DOUGLAS, MR. BAILEY, PEOPLE REPRESENTED BY MISS CLARK, MR. DARDEN AND MR. HODGMAN. THE JURY IS NOT PRESENT. DEPUTY MAGNERA, MAY WE HAVE THE JURY, PLEASE.
ALL RIGHT. COUNSEL AND THE AUDIENCE, PLEASE BE SEATED. ALL RIGHT. GOOD MORNING, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN.
WE ARE GOING TO BEGIN WITH THE OPENING STATEMENTS MADE BY THE LAWYERS IN THE CASE. LET ME REMIND YOU FROM MY INSTRUCTIONS TO YOU YESTERDAY THAT ANY STATEMENTS MADE TO YOU BY THE ATTORNEYS DURING THE COURSE OF THEIR OPENING STATEMENTS ARE NOT EVIDENCE AND SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED AS SUCH BY YOU. THESE OPENING STATEMENTS ARE NORMALLY GIVEN BY THE ATTORNEYS TO SORT OF GIVE YOU AN OVERALL VIEW OF THE EVIDENCE THAT THEY INTEND TO PRESENT. IT'S TO GIVE YOU A ROAD MAP SO TO SPEAK AS TO HOW TO EVALUATE THE EVIDENCE. THIS CASE, AS YOU KNOW, WILL BE RELATIVELY LONG. AND BY NECESSITY, SOME OF THIS EVIDENCE WILL BE PRESENTED TO YOU OUT OF CHRONOLOGICAL OR LOGICAL ORDER. SO THEY'LL NEED TO EXPLAIN TO YOU THE CASE THAT THEY INTEND TO PRESENT. ALL RIGHT. ARE BOTH SIDES PREPARED TO GO FORWARD? MR. COCHRAN?
THESE OPENING STATEMENTS ARE NORMALLY GIVEN BY THE ATTORNEYS TO SORT OF GIVE YOU AN OVERALL VIEW OF THE EVIDENCE THAT THEY INTEND TO PRESENT. IT'S TO GIVE YOU A ROAD MAP SO TO SPEAK AS TO HOW TO EVALUATE THE EVIDENCE.