ALL RIGHT. GOOD MORNING, COUNSEL. BACK ON THE RECORD IN THE SIMPSON MATTER. MR. SIMPSON IS AGAIN PRESENT WITH COUNSEL, MR. SHAPIRO, MR. BAILEY, MR. UELMEN. THE PEOPLE ARE REPRESENTED BY MISS LEWIS, MR. DARDEN. THE MATTER IS HERE FOR VARIOUS MOTIONS. COUNSEL, I DISCUSSED WITH YOU INFORMALLY AT THE SIDE BAR YESTERDAY, OR THE DAY BEFORE, THE COURT'S INTENTION TO PRE-INSTRUCT THE JURY PRIOR TO OPENING STATEMENTS, AND IF YOU WOULD SUBMIT TO THE COURT ON TUESDAY, THE 17TH, ANY PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS THAT YOU WISH, AND I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHAT YOUR OPINION IS OF CALJIC 2.90, IN LIGHT OF PEOPLE VERSUS FREEMAN AND OF COURSE VICTOR VERSUS NEBRASKA, THE MORAL EVIDENCE ASPECT TO THE REASONABLE DOUBT INSTRUCTION, SO LET ME KNOW WHAT YOUR POSITION IS ON THAT. ALL RIGHT. NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS THE MOTION TO QUASH THE SUBPOENA ON MARGUERITE THOMAS. AND MR. JONES, GOOD MORNING, COUNSEL.
I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHAT YOUR OPINION IS OF CALJIC 2.90, IN LIGHT OF PEOPLE VERSUS FREEMAN AND OF COURSE VICTOR VERSUS NEBRASKA, THE MORAL EVIDENCE ASPECT TO THE REASONABLE DOUBT INSTRUCTION