YOUR HONOR, WE SPEND ALL THIS TIME AND THIS IS THE EXACT SAME CRIME SCENE, ABSOLUTELY AND --
THE ONLY PROBLEM WE HAVE WITH THIS, THE SAME ONE AS BEFORE, THAT IT IS ABOUT TWELVE HOURS LATER, AND TO SHOW THIS TO THIS JURY WITH THIS WITNESS AFTER THE CRIME SCENE IS NO LONGER SECURED IS NOTHING SHORT OF A LIE.
IF COUNSEL CAN ESTABLISH A TIME FOUNDATION, WE CAN TALK ABOUT IT, BUT RIGHT NOW THERE IS NO FOUNDATION. THEY ARE MISLEADING.
OKAY. WE SPEND OURS THIS MORNING WITH HER TALKING ABOUT HOW THIS CRIME SCENE IS INVIOLATE, THAT PEOPLE DON'T GET IN THERE, THERE IS TAPE UP AND EVERYTHING.
WE HAVE EVIDENCE, WE HAVE VIDEOTAPES. SHE KNOWS PEOPLE ARE WALKING THROUGH THERE AND WE CAN IDENTIFY THESE GUYS. WE CAN IDENTIFY -- WE CAN IDENTIFY VANNATTER, LANGE, TWO OR THREE OTHERS THAT I DON'T RECALL RIGHT NOW WE WILL BE ABLE TO IDENTIFY WHO WERE WALKING AT THAT SCENE. NOW, THIS IS A UNIFORMED OFFICER. THIS -- THIS AREA WAS HOSED DOWN WHEN THEY FINISHED USING IT. IT WAS HOSED DOWN AT THAT POINT.
THIS IS WHAT I WAS ASKING BEFORE. THEY CAME BACK ON JULY 3RD AND TOOK THOSE OTHER PICTURES, THE SUPPOSEDLY IMPORTANT STUFF BY THE GATE. THEY CAN TRY ALL THEY WANT, JUDGE, BUT ULTIMATELY THE LAPD HAS TO RISE AND FALL ON ITS OWN. WE ALL LOVE THE LAPD, BUT THEY ARE AREN'T PERFECT AND I DON'T HAVE TO TELL YOU THAT. AT ANY RATE, YOUR HONOR, THIS PHOTOGRAPH, I HAVE A RIGHT, IT SEEMS, AFTER ALL SHE HAS DONE ASKING THIS PARTICULAR OFFICER IF HE SAW AN OFFICER LIKE THIS WALKING THROUGH THE SCENE. WE HAVE THIS ON VIDEO AND WE HAVE NOW PRINTED IT UP. THIS IS THE EXACT SAME SCENE THEY HAVE WITH SHOWING WALKING RIGHT UP. SHE IS TALKING ABOUT WALKING OVER HERE. THIS IS WHAT CROSS-EXAMINATION IS FOR.
WAIT, WAIT, WAIT, WAIT. WHAT I HAVE HERE ARE THREE PHOTOGRAPHS WHICH HAVE NOT YET BEEN MARKED. THEY BEAR NUMBERS 57, 58 AND 59 IN THE UPPER RIGHT-HAND CORNER. 57 APPEARS TO BE AT THE SIDEWALK LEADING INTO THE WALKWAY. THERE -- YOU CAN SEE FROM BELOW THE KNEES DOWN, APPEARS TO BE DARK PANTS AND DARK SHOES. NO. 58 IS -- APPEARS TO BE VIRTUALLY THE SAME LOCATION, HOWEVER, IT SHOWS FROM ABOUT MID-BUTTOCKS DOWN AND THE NEXT STEP ON TO THE WALKWAY; HOWEVER, IT IS DIFFICULT TO TELL IF THIS IS SOMEBODY IN UNIFORM OR SOMEBODY WEARING A SUIT JACKET BECAUSE YOU CAN'T TELL HERE. IT APPEARS TO BE A SUIT JACKET.
I WILL REPRESENT TO THE COURT THESE PICTURES ARE TAKEN IN SEQUENCE FROM THE VIDEO. THIS IS THE SAME OFFICER AND I CAN SHOW YOU. I WILL BE MORE THAN HAPPY TO SHOW YOU.
IF COUNSEL KNOWS ALL THAT, PERHAPS COUNSEL CAN SUPPLY US WITH THE TIME AND THE DATE THAT THIS OCCURRED.
WAIT, WAIT, BOTH SIDES. ALL RIGHT. 59 APPEARS TO SHOW THE REAR FROM FEET TO JUST BELOW THE ARMPITS OF A -- APPEARS TO BE A POLICE OFFICER FROM THE STYLE OF UNIFORM, THE T-SHIRT THAT ISN'T QUITE BIG ENOUGH OR TOO BIG.
AND A SAM BROWNE WITH APPROPRIATE GUN, RADIO, WHAT APPEARS TO BE A TEAR GAS CANNISTER AND HANDCUFFS, BUT IT ALSO APPEARS TO BE DAYLIGHT.
DAYLIGHT, BUT, JUDGE, I HAVE -- THIS CRIME SCENE, THE CORONER DOESN'T COME FOR TEN HOURS.
THE QUESTION IS -- THERE IS ONLY ONE THAT IS APPROPRIATE. FROM THESE THREE PHOTOGRAPHS CAN YOU IDENTIFY THIS OFFICER?
OBVIOUSLY NO ONE CAN. THIS IS SO DISINGENUOUS. THIS IS SO DISINGENUOUS. LOOK AT THIS.
THIS IS EXTREMELY HIGHLY AND COMPLETELY DISINGENUOUS. THERE IS NO WAY THAT ANYONE COULD IDENTIFY WHO THIS IS. IF IT WERE MY HUSBAND I COULDN'T IDENTIFY HIM.
KEY QUOTEYES. IT WAS TAKEN -- AS NEAR AS WE CAN TELL IT WAS TAKEN ON JUNE 13. WE WILL BE ABLE TO LINK IT UP.
HERE IS THE OFFER OF PROOF. WE ALSO HAVE A VIDEO. YOU HAVE SEEN IT BEFORE. THIS WAS TAKEN FROM THE VIDEO. I WILL BE JUST AS GLAD TO SHOW YOU THE VIDEO OF THIS GUY WALKING THROUGH THERE. WE PRINTED THESE UP DURING THE LUNCH HOUR AND TOOK THESE OFF THE VIDEO SO I COULD SHOW COUNSEL BEFORE I WHIPPED OUT THE VIDEO, BUT AGAIN, THIS IS PART OF HAVE VIDEO. THEY GO THROUGH ALL THE TROUBLE TRYING TO SHOW IT. JUDGE, THEY THINK THEY ARE GOING TO BE ABLE TO TRY THIS CASE ON THEIR THEORY WHEN THEY KNOW THESE GUYS WERE WALKING THROUGH. THIS IS ON THE 13TH. AFTER THAT THEY WASHED DOWN THE SCENE. TEN HOURS TO CALL THE CORONER. AND JUDGE, IT IS ABSOLUTELY FALSE FOR HER TO GET UP THERE AND GO TEN TIMES. TALKING ABOUT DISINGENUOUS. THAT THERE IS NOBODY WALKING THROUGH THIS AREA. TIPPY-TOEING AROUND AND THERE IS A PICTURE OF THIS GUY WALKING RIGHT THROUGH THE MIDDLE OF THE SCENE.
UNLESS YOU CAN SHOW ME, GIVE ME A GOOD FAITH OFFER OF PROOF THAT YOU CAN SHOW ME DATE AND TIME WHEN THAT WAS DONE --
IF YOU GIVE ME A FEW MINUTES, I WILL BE ABLE TO DO THAT. YEAH. I WILL RUN BACK THROUGH THE VIDEO, BECAUSE THIS WAS TAKEN FROM THE VIDEO. OR I WILL JUST ASK YOU TO LET ME SHOW THE VIDEO AND I WILL SHOW THE VIDEO AT THIS POINT.
ARE WE GOING TO FOOL SOMEBODY HERE THAT IT WAS NOT TAKEN FROM THEIR SCENE? I HAVE FOUND IN THE SAME VIDEO -- IF YOU SAW THE VIDEO IT WOULD HELP YOU TO UNDERSTAND. THEY ARE JUST BEGINNING TO MARK THINGS ON THE 13TH. THIS IS THE CRIME SCENE.
AND THE PROBLEM WITH THAT VIDEO, IT WAS CUT THIRTEEN OR FOURTEEN TIMES, AS THE COURT COULD SEE, AND THIS IS AN ABSOLUTE FRAUD WE ARE GOING TO PERPETRATE ON THE JURY. WE ARE GOING TO SHOW THEM PICTURES FROM A TIME WE DON'T EVEN KNOW AFTER EVERYTHING HAS BEEN PRESERVED AND COLLECTED AND TRY TO SHOWN THE SCENE WAS CONTAMINATED WHEN IN FACT THIS WAS PRESERVED AND COLLECTED BEFORE THE --
I WANT TO BE ABLE TO SHOW THE ENTIRE VIDEO TO THE JURY AT THIS POINT. THIS IS CROSS-EXAMINATION.
SOME FOUNDATION, THOUGH, AND COUNSEL HAS NONE AND WE STILL DON'T HAVE A COPY OF THAT VIDEO.
TO SHOW THIS TO THIS JURY WITH THIS WITNESS AFTER THE CRIME SCENE IS NO LONGER SECURED IS NOTHING SHORT OF A LIE.
THIS IS EXTREMELY HIGHLY AND COMPLETELY DISINGENUOUS. THERE IS NO WAY THAT ANYONE COULD IDENTIFY WHO THIS IS. IF IT WERE MY HUSBAND I COULDN'T IDENTIFY HIM.
THIS IS AN ABSOLUTE FRAUD WE ARE GOING TO PERPETRATE ON THE JURY.
JUDGE, IT IS ABSOLUTELY FALSE FOR HER TO GET UP THERE AND GO TEN TIMES TALKING ABOUT DISINGENUOUS — THAT THERE IS NOBODY WALKING THROUGH THIS AREA. TIPPY-TOEING AROUND AND THERE IS A PICTURE OF THIS GUY WALKING RIGHT THROUGH THE MIDDLE OF THE SCENE.
HE IS SLIPPERY.