I'M SORRY, I HATE TO DO THIS, BUT I DON'T THINK WE HAVE SEEN THESE NOTES AND THESE MEASUREMENTS.
TALKING ABOUT THE LATEST ONES FROM MARCH 21. THESE ARE HIS ORIGINALS. THESE ARE ORIGINALS.
BUT THERE IS ANOTHER NOTE IN MARCH THAT HE HAS UP IN FRONT OF HIM THAT HE IS READING FROM THAT ARE NOT THESE.
YOU ASKED HIM A QUESTION. I WENT OVER AND LOOKED AT THE NOTES AND THE MEASUREMENTS AND I HAVEN'T SEEN THEM AT ALL.
FOR THE RECORD, WE ARE LOOKING AT A DIVIDER PAGE IN MR. FUNG'S NOTEBOOK. IT APPEARS TO BE A NUMBER OF LINES WHICH THE COURT FINDS TO BE RELATIVELY INNOCUOUS.
KEY QUOTEYOUR HONOR, IF I MAY JUST STATE THE RELEVANCY SO YOU DON'T THINK THAT I'M BEING OVERLY PICKY?
I THINK THAT FROM THE FACE OF IT, THESE REPRESENT MEASUREMENTS WITH RESPECT TO WHERE THE VARIOUS DIFFERENT ITEMS ARE AT BUNDY AND REMEASUREMENTS THAT ARE MADE AT ANOTHER TIME. THAT IS THE PROBLEM.
THEY ARE AN AID TO ME FOR TESTIMONY AS FAR AS IF THEY WERE TO ASK ME DIFFERENT MEASUREMENTS AND THINGS LIKE THAT, RATHER THAN GOING THROUGH MY NOTES AND --
KEY QUOTEWELL, ACTUALLY, I THINK THIS IS COVERED BY THE EVIDENCE CODE WHICH SAYS THAT IF A WITNESS CREATES SOMETHING TO USE FOR HIS TESTIMONY TO REFRESH HIS RECOLLECTION, THEY GET IT. IF HE USES IT TO REFRESH HIS RECOLLECTION. I CAN'T REMEMBER THE CODE SECTION.
I WENT OVER AND LOOKED AT THE NOTES AND THE MEASUREMENTS AND I HAVEN'T SEEN THEM AT ALL.
FOR THE RECORD, WE ARE LOOKING AT A DIVIDER PAGE IN MR. FUNG'S NOTEBOOK. IT APPEARS TO BE A NUMBER OF LINES WHICH THE COURT FINDS TO BE RELATIVELY INNOCUOUS.
I THINK THAT FROM THE FACE OF IT, THESE REPRESENT MEASUREMENTS WITH RESPECT TO WHERE THE VARIOUS DIFFERENT ITEMS ARE AT BUNDY AND REMEASUREMENTS THAT ARE MADE AT ANOTHER TIME. THAT IS THE PROBLEM.
THEY ARE AN AID TO ME FOR TESTIMONY AS FAR AS IF THEY WERE TO ASK ME DIFFERENT MEASUREMENTS AND THINGS LIKE THAT, RATHER THAN GOING THROUGH MY NOTES.