📄 Pre-jury discussion — Monday, April 3, 1995
📅 Apr 3 — Day 50
bloodchain_of_custody
Address:
C:\DEPT103\CRIMINAL\1995\APR\3\PRE-JURY-DISCUSSION.DOC
TRIAL
▲ Day 50 of 167

Pre-jury discussion

Date: Monday, April 3, 1995 • Utterances: 4
A brief pre-session exchange in which prosecutor Goldberg asks Judge Ito whether the court will resolve a pending evidentiary issue involving the phenol test before the afternoon session. The judge's dry response and Goldberg's reply suggest the matter is still being worked out. No substantive ruling occurs.
1 THE COURT:

ARE WE READY TO PROCEED? BACK ON THE RECORD IN THE SIMPSON MATTER. ALL PARTIES ARE AGAIN PRESENT. DEPUTY MAGNERA, LET'S HAVE THE JURORS, PLEASE.

2 MR. GOLDBERG:

YOUR HONOR, WAS THE COURT GOING TO RESOLVE THE PHENOL ISSUE BEFORE THIS AFTERNOON?

KEY QUOTE
3 THE COURT:

ARE WE THERE YET?

4 MR. GOLDBERG:

WE'RE GETTING THERE.

Temperature

routine

Key Quotes (2)

Hank Goldberg
WAS THE COURT GOING TO RESOLVE THE PHENOL ISSUE BEFORE THIS AFTERNOON?
Flags a pending evidentiary dispute over phenol (presumptive blood) testing that needs resolution before jury proceedings resume.
Lance A. Ito
ARE WE THERE YET?
Dry, impatient response suggesting the issue is not yet ready for ruling; light moment in an otherwise routine check-in.

Evidence (1)

Informal
Phenol (phenolphthalein) presumptive blood test — evidentiary issue pending court resolution
discussed informally, no ruling made

Notable Exchanges (1)

Hank GoldbergLance A. Ito
Goldberg asks for resolution of the phenol test issue; Ito deflects with a terse question, Goldberg concedes it isn't ready.
procedural

Light Moments (1)

Lance A. Ito
Ito's 'ARE WE THERE YET?' — a mildly impatient, almost exasperated response to being pressed on an unresolved issue.

Objections

None recorded
Proceeding 5545 • 4 utterances
Criminal Trial
Department 103
⚖️ Start
📂 APR 3, 1995 📄 Pre-jury discussion
APR 3, 1995 KRT DvH TD