In view of Mr. Simpson's testimony that these 30 pictures are bogus, I would like Mr. Richards to testify about this subject. And I'm more than happy to make him available first thing in the morning to give a deposition on the subject, if they would like. But I believe that they've now put this issue into play, and we need to -- we'd like to put Mr. Richards on, in addition to the Scull photo, to talk about these photos.
KEY QUOTEThat's a very interesting concept, that we have put the issue in play. I didn't ask any question about those shoes. He put the issue in play. He cannot now bootstrap this individual into being an expert for these photographs. And we've argued this. And I think the record is clear on our position, and our position, I believe, is clear on the issue.
We've argued it, too, Your Honor. I mean, he was impeached by those photographs. He now says they're a fraud. And we are entitled to respond to that. And we can respond to that by demonstrating that they're not a fraud. And it's not -- it wasn't our choice that he was going to give the testimony he did, and then get caught by these 30 photos. We had no way of knowing that. It was his choice.
Well, Mr. Petrocelli, you have offered those photographs. You indicated you're going to lay foundation for the photographs. You may do all that. But I'm not looking towards technical impeachment with regards to the issue of whether they're a fraud or not, because there's nothing to impeach at this point, other than bare-faced denial.
Fair enough. (At 4:30 P.M., an adjournment was taken until Tuesday, January 14, 1997, at 8:30 A.M.)
In view of Mr. Simpson's testimony that these 30 pictures are bogus, I would like Mr. Richards to testify about this subject.
He cannot now bootstrap this individual into being an expert for these photographs.
He was impeached by those photographs. He now says they're a fraud. And we are entitled to respond to that.
I'm not looking towards technical impeachment with regards to the issue of whether they're a fraud or not, because there's nothing to impeach at this point, other than bare-faced denial.