More than five, more than ten? You've shown us one. Was it more than five or more than ten or less than that?
I would say perhaps a dozen. I don't know -- he might have taken -- used the film up, but he might not have taken it all of the same thing.
(BY MR. MEDVENE) (Reading:)
Mr. MacDonell, please listen to the question I ask you.
When you took only -- there was only one photograph taken of those little balls that you saw on the inner surface of the sock?
(BY MR. MEDVENE) Dr. MacDonell -- or Mr. MacDonell, I want to move to a somewhat different area.
Is it true that you cannot tell this jury that the little red balls on the inner surface that you claim you saw are absolutely associated with the outer stain that you testified about, is that correct?
And getting back to that area for just a moment, the space or the spot on side 3, where you claimed something went through to form this ball, is on top of the cut-out where you have no personal knowledge whether there was even any blood there to drip through and surrounded by the periphery where you've told the prior jury there was no blood that went from side 1 to 2; is that correct, sir?
(BY MR. MEDVENE) You made some reference to Dr. Lee.
Is it correct sir, in his notes he doesn't describe the shape of any alleged round red balls; that's true, is it not?
Is it true, sir, that he never uses the words, I saw 6 or 7 little red balls, he never says that, does he, in his notes; isn't that correct?
Sustained.
(BY MR. MEDVENE) To the best of your knowledge, is it true, sir, that Dr. Lee did not record in his notes seeing any 6 or 7 little round balls?
Sustained.
(BY MR. MEDVENE) You're saying, Mr. MacDonell, that you took no notes on April 2 describing this phenomenon, and yet you have never even seen Dr. Lee's notes?
I've seen Dr. Lee's notes.
And I do believe I may have made a notation about the -- I think it just says photomicrographs were taken, but in that notation on my diagram I made at that time, I don't think I added to it little red ball or something. I have it in here.
My question is, you knew it was not in Dr. Lee's notes 'cause you've now told us you've seen those notes?
No, I don't believe I did, but the record will be the best evidence. I don't want to quarrel with you.
Is it true that when you looked at Dr. Lee's notes, you did not see any reference to seeing 6 or 7 little red balls; yes or no, sir?
I don't recall. I am not sure whether he put it in or not. He may not have and he may have. I do not remember.
Sir, counsel asked you about, you know, your examination of these little red balls.
Let me ask you, isn't it true that on the side of the cut-out, where you claim you found this little red ball, you tested another spot where there was a Nicole Brown blood stain is; is that true?
Sustained.
(BY MR. MEDVENE) Isn't it true, sir, that you probed other places on the sock where Nicole Brown's blood was identified, and did not find any of the blood soak through to side 2 or 3 of the sock?
(BY MR. MEDVENE) You wouldn't categorize yourself as an expert on leather gloves, would you?
Just as a wearer.
And you're not testifying here, are you, sir, that the gloves worn by the killer in this case did not shrink to a certain extent prior to the time of the murders; you're not saying that, are you?
And you have your arrangement for payment in connection with the work you've done, in connection with your testimony here; yes or no, sir? Yes or no, do you have an arrangement for payment?
Going to bill them for the time that's spent, and the three days time away from my laboratory but --
KEY QUOTE-- we haven't sat down and said this is what we're going to charge, this is what you're going to pay, no.
I can't absolutely say that they are.
He told me that several times.
No arrangement, no. Going to bill them for the time that's spent, and the three days time away from my laboratory but -- we haven't sat down and said this is what we're going to charge, this is what you're going to pay, no.
You didn't say notes in your last question. You asked if we had discussed it.