📄 Re-redirect examination of Frank Spangler (part 1) — Thursday, December 12, 1996
Address:
C:\DEPT103\CIVIL\1996\DEC\12\RE-REDIRECT-EXAMINATION-OF-FRA.DOC
TRIAL
▲ Day 31 of 57

Re-redirect examination of Frank Spangler (part 1)

Witness: Lt. Frank Spangler
Examiner: Edward Medvene
Called by: Plaintiff • Date: Thursday, December 12, 1996 • Utterances: 5
A brief recross-examination in which Medvene confirms that Detective Fuhrman was stationed out front at Bundy with other officers while waiting for robbery/homicide detectives to arrive. The exchange is minimal — just two confirmatory questions — before Medvene passes and Leonard begins a further recross that is not captured in this excerpt.
1 Q:

He was in your view because you were in Bundy, in front of the residence, waiting for the robbery/homicide detectives to arrive?

2 A:

That's right. We waited out front.

3 Q:

And Detective Fuhrman was also out front with other officers; isn't that correct?

4 A:

He was one of the officers that waited; that's correct.

KEY QUOTE
5 MR. MEDVENE:

Thank you. I have nothing further.

FURTHER RECROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR. LEONARD:

Temperature

procedural

Key Quotes (1)

Frank Spangler
He was one of the officers that waited; that's correct.
Confirms Fuhrman's presence at the Bundy scene early on, relevant to the chain of custody and opportunity arguments surrounding the crime scene.

Notable Exchanges (1)

Edward MedveneFrank Spangler
Medvene locks in Spangler's confirmation that Fuhrman was among the officers waiting out front at Bundy before robbery/homicide arrived.
strategic

Objections

None recorded
Proceeding 8640 • 5 utterances • Plaintiff witness
Civil Trial
Department 103
⚖️ Start
📂 DEC 12, 1996 📄 Re-redirect examination of Fra
DEC 12, 1996 KRT DvH TD