You do solemnly swear that the testimony you may give in the cause now pending before this court shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God?
And you went through the required nurses school that allowed you to become a registered nurse?
Okay.
So you have 33 years with the city. Seven years presumably prior to that you had nursing experience at some other location?
You have a fair amount of responsibility with respect to the inmates that might be ill or other responsibilities that you have; isn't that correct?
Now, during the course of your training, as well as your experiences as a nurse for 40 years, one of your main responsibilities as a nurse is measuring things, correct, like medications?
And it's very important that when you measure a medication for an inmate or whoever, that you do it precisely, correct?
And in the afternoon, at approximately 1:30, Mr. Simpson was brought into the jail infirmary, correct?
2:25.
Is it accurate that he was brought into the infirmary for you to do basically two things: One, draw his blood, and two, examine his finger, examine the cut on his finger?
My first understanding was he was brought in for me to draw some blood. After I drew the blood, I was asked to treat his finger.
Now, prior to the time that you drew Mr. Simpson's blood, you checked his vital signs, did you not?
Now, I want to ask you about -- before I ask you about the blood, I want to ask you about examining his finger.
Detective Vannatter asked you to examine Mr. Simpson's finger, correct, or his hand?
I'm checking.
Starting at page -- I'm sorry. Line 24 on 86. And I'll read as far as you want me to.
Where do you want me to stop?
I want you to go -- pick up 87, line 16, and over on page 89, question 1 through --
(BY MR. BLASIER) Do you recall in the deposition that we took, I was present? Do you remember that?
(BY MR. BLASIER) Starting at 86.
Do you remember they -- by the way, you were under oath at that time, correct?
And prior to your testimony in that deposition, you had spent some time with the plaintiffs' attorneys, had you not? Mr. Medvene?
Incidentally, one of the side effects of the heart problems that you've had is memory loss; isn't that correct?
At some point you examined
Mr. Simpson's hand, left hand, do you
recall that? A. Yes. Q. Why did you do that? A. Because I was asked to. Q. Who asked you to? A. I believe it was
Vannatter.
Then there was an objection.
And at line 14 I ask: (Reading:)
At some point were you asked to
do something with respect to
Mr. Simpson's hand or hands?
And then you answered: (Reading:)
Not hand. I may have heard from
Mr. Vannatter -- I put the dressing -- I
went to put a dressing on Mr. Simpson's
arm and he said I don't need that.
(BY MR. BLASIER) Were you aware at the time of the deposition being taken, that it was a significant issue with respect to whether you examined Mr. Simpson hands?
Mr. Medvene, you told him line 16 and he read to line 16. Now you want to do something on your own examination, save it for there.
Excuse me, Your Honor. He stopped in the middle. It says, at some point were you asked to do something with respect to Mr. Simpson's hand or hands, and he said not hand.
(BY MR. BLASIER) Now, is it your testimony here today -- well, tell us what it is you recall today, about what you were asked to do with respect to Mr. Simpson's hand or finger?
I -- After I drew the blood, I heard -- I think it was Mr. Vannatter, I don't know which one it was, request you take a look at Mr. Simpson's finger, or words to that effect.
Picking up his hand, looking at his finger, cleaning it off with some Aqueous Zephrin -- I'm sorry, some Betadine, then I put a dressing on it, a band-aid.
Okay.
Were you told don't look at his other fingers? I mean his fingers were attached to the rest of his hand, weren't they?
No, I was asked could you please look at that finger, and that's all. I didn't do any full examination. Mr. Simpson was not under arrest. I had no doctor there. All I did was just clean off that one finger, and that was it. I didn't look to see if there was anything else.
Neither Detective Vannatter nor Detective Lange directed your attention to any other injury; is that correct?
Okay.
Now, I want to ask you some questions about the blood that you drew.
Certainly, would you agree that the security of a reference blood sample is very important?
And that envelope sets forth the procedure that's to be used in drawing somebody's blood, correct?
And let me show you this first, and we'll put it on the Elmo.
This is one of those envelopes, is it not?
And this is 2251 -- let's start at the top.
Now, at the top of this envelope it says analyzed evidence to be refrigerated.
That is the correct procedure with respect to blood, that it should be refrigerated, correct?
Lay some foundation with regard to, if you're going do something, about what he's supposed to do or evidence preservation. There's been no foundation other than he drew blood.
Nurses don't preserve the blood. We take it to the lab in a general hospital. We would take it to the laboratory. They would do what they do with it. We don't keep it.
Okay.
My question is was part of your training as a nurse about refrigerating blood, that blood should be refrigerated?
Okay. Thank you. That wasn't too hard.
Now, it's also required procedure that the person drawing the blood, meaning you, is to completely fill up the vial, correct?
(BY MR. BLASIER) It says the officer requesting withdrawing of the blood is to tell you to fill up the vial, correct?
According to that, it's supposed to be filled up.
THE COURT REPORTER: Excuse me. Does that have a number?
MR. P. BAKER: 2251.
Okay. 1:30, ladies and gentlemen.
Don't talk about the case, don't form or express any opinion.
Thank you, Your Honor.
THANO PERATIS the witness on the stand at the time of the luncheon recess, having been previously sworn, was examined and testified further as follows:
DIRECT EXAMINATION (Resumed) BY MR. BLASIER:
(BY MR. BLASIER) Mr. Peratis, at the break, we were talking about the analyzed evidence envelope. And this appears --
(BY MR. BLASIER) At the bottom of this analyzed evidence envelope is an affidavit, correct?
And that's to be filled out by the officer, and signed under penalty of perjury by you, correct?
And the required procedure is that, you fill this out at the time the blood is drawn, sign it, and put the blood in the envelope and seal it, correct?
Okay.
But you see number 4 down here?
"When the affidavit is completed, sign below it as a witnessing officer and seal the vial in this envelope . . ." so the officer taking the blood is supposed to do what?
Let's look at 2252. See if you -- can you look back at the TV, Mr. Peratis, see if you recognize this as --
(BY MR. BLASIER) So we're sure, let me help you -- show you 2252 that is a photograph of the front of the envelope with Mr. Simpson's reference -- Mr. Simpson's reference vial was put into, correct?
We have some in the dispensary. And I think that one came from the dispensary. I'm not sure if it was brought in, or if I had it in the office. We have them, and some of them were brought in.
Let me show you this one on the Elmo.
You see at the bottom where it's dated, by your signature?
And it's dated.
This is all my writing. That's my printing. This is my printing. That's my signature. (Indicating.)
Now, the procedure that you used with Mr. Simpson, to draw blood, was to use a syringe, correct?
Mr. Elmo [sic], I'm going to put it on the Elmo.
Does this appear to be the type of syringe that you used to draw Mr. Simpson's blood?
Okay.
And after you drew Mr. Simpson's blood on the 13th, and it was in this syringe, you transferred it to --
The purpose of putting it in that kind of tube is to keep the blood from coagulating, right?
And it's called a vacutainer because there's actually a vacuum in that purple-top vial, is there not?
(BY MR. BLASIER) Now, when you drew Mr. Simpson's blood on the 13th, isn't it accurate that you drew between 7.9 and 8.1 cc's of blood?
And that took place sometime within a couple weeks of your drawing Mr. Simpson's blood, correct?
And when you testified in front of the grand jury, Marcia Clark was asking you questions, correct?
Objection. Relevance, materiality. It's not inconsistent, to the best of my knowledge, what they're going to read. It's hearsay.
Okay.
That the grand jury -- do you recall being asked the following questions and giving the following answers:
I'm referring to page 370, line 23. Start at line 26.
Do you recall being asked this question at the grand jury: "Q. Can you describe for us
what is the method by which you removed
blood from Mr. Simpson. "A. I put a tourniquet on his
forearm, cleaned the site with aqueous
zephrin and put a 10-cc syringe with
about a number 20 needle in the vein in
his arm. And I withdrew about 8 cc's of
blood."
Is that what you testified to?
And do you also recall testifying, starting at line 10, you were asked again by Marcia Clark: "Approximately how much blood did you remove?"
And you answered, "approximately 8 cc's," correct?
Again, I don't remember that.
It had to be there. I had to have done it, but I don't remember that.
And there was only about a two- or three-week period of time from the time you drew the blood, until you testified about the size of the needle, the size of the syringe, and how much you withdrew at the grand jury, correct?
Then shortly after that -- shortly after that, you testified at the preliminary hearing in the Simpson case, did you not?
You remember testifying at the preliminary hearing?
And incidentally, you didn't have any heart problems between the 13th, when you drew his blood, and when you testified at the grand jury and at the preliminary hearing, did you?
Now, I'm saying between those two periods of time, you didn't have a heart attack, did you?
Now, do you remember being asked the following question: Question by Mr. Shapiro and giving the following answer that I'm referring to page 25 line 8. By Mr. Shapiro, "Q. How much blood did
you withdraw from Mr. Simpson. "A. Approximately 8
cc's.
Can you put this on the Elmo, please.
"Q. When you say
approximately, you did not measure the
amount. "A. Where well it
could have been 7.9 or it could have
been 8.1. I just looked at the syringe
and it looked at about 8 cc's I withdraw
the needle from his arm.
Do you remember testifying that way in the preliminary hearing?
And that was the state of your recollection, when you testified under oath, about three weeks after drawing Mr. Simpson's blood, correct?
Okay. And your best recollection at that time, your experience as a nurse when you drew between 7.9 and 8.1 cc's correct?
All right. Now at some point after your sworn testimony at the grand jury and the preliminary hearing, you became aware of an issue with respect to whether blood was missing from that vial, did you not?
And you found out that Mr. Cochran had stated in his opening statement that there was about 1.5 to 2 cc's of blood missing from Mr. Simpson's reference vial, correct?
Now, after you found out that there was an issue about missing blood, you became very concerned, did you not --
Correct.
So you set about to determine whether or not you had made a mistake about how much blood you drew, correct?
And you changed your testimony, did you not, or you changed your position and gave a different amount that you drew, correct?
You remember myself and Mr. Neufeld and Joe Ellen Dimitri, us coming over to your infirmary to talk to you about that?
Mr. Peratis, don't you remember, as we walked in, you had a big television set there, with the trial on, and you made a comment, "Gee, I just saw you guys on television."
The television was on. I may have seen you there.
I was never -- I wasn't watching the trial. Maybe I would glance up once in a while. When I'm at work, I'm too busy to watch television.
At any time you viewed that videotape prior to the time that you found out there was an issue about missing blood, did you ever tell any of your friends or anybody, "Gee, I made a mistake; I really didn't draw 7.9 to 8.1 cc's of blood."?
Before you found out that that was an important issue in the criminal case, did you tell anyone, after reviewing your videotape with your friends, or at any other time, "Gee, I made a mistake; I really didn't draw approximately 8 cc's."?
Okay.
So prior to learning from Mr. Cochran's opening statement, you didn't tell anybody that you'd made a mistake, did you?
Now, after your heart attack in June of 1995, you experienced problems with memory loss, didn't you?
And it was after that time that you had an interview with Mr. Goldberg, where you tried to recreate how much blood of Mr. Simpson you'd actually drawn, correct?
And your recollection of those events, when you made that -- did that interview with Mr. Goldberg, was not nearly as fresh as they had been two and three weeks after you actually drew the blood; isn't that correct?
So certainly, your best recollection of how much blood you drew was from two and three weeks after you drew the blood, as opposed to after you had your heart attack; isn't that correct?
Your best recollection of how much blood you drew, would have been two or three weeks after you drew it, when you testified twice under oath that it was about 8 cc's, correct?
Well, I -- I remember drawing the blood. That's -- the 8 cc's, I know I was wrong. I can't say that -- I mean, you've got me all confused now.
Okay.
After your heart attack, and after you had an interview with Mr. Goldberg, what was your statement as to how much blood you had actually drawn?
And it accounted exactly for the amounts that Mr. Cochran had described as being missing from Mr. Simpson's reference vial during his opening statement in the criminal trial; isn't that correct?
Good afternoon, Mr. Peratis.
Were you told how much blood to draw on June 13, by Detective Vannatter?
Now, on June 13, immediately after drawing Mr. Simpson's blood, did you measure the amount that you drew?
Do you have any general practice, in drawing blood, to write down the amount that you draw?
Now, when you drew the blood from Mr. Simpson, can you explain to the ladies and gentlemen of the jury how you inserted the needle and where the calibration was when you inserted the needle and drew the blood.
Insert -- inserting the needle, you have a bevel. You want the bevel up, so you can see where you're going.
Okay. Now, as I inserted, when I had the bevel up, the calibration is on the bottom. So when I inserted the needle, I couldn't see what I was drawing.
And then when I was -- I was drawing the blood back, at a certain point, it -- it -- the blood stopped, which means that the wall of the vein hit the bevel of the needle.
You can turn the syringe and draw more, which, in my opinion, could cause damage to the vein, so I didn't do that.
I just looked -- it looked like it was enough blood to test. I said, "Officers, is this enough?"
I heard a yes. I withdrew the needle, and immediately put a sponge on Mr. Simpson. Immediately, I took the syringe and put it in a vacutainer, and it sucked in the blood.
I threw out the syringe in a place -- in a decontaminated spot, where we throw all our syringes.
So are you saying, as you were drawing the blood, before you filled the vial, the blood stopped going into the vial because it hit the vein?
(Continuing.) The blood was coming into the syringe, but at a certain point, apparently the wall of the vein hit the needle.
-- coming into the syringe. I could have possibly pulled more by turning the syringe. That can cause trauma to the vein. We don't want to do that.
We had enough blood, so I withdrew the needle, put a sponge on Mr. -- put a sponge on Mr. Simpson's arm, and taped it, took the syringe, and immediately stuck the needle into the tube. The tube sucked the blood.
I -- can I demonstrate that? It would be a lot easier than saying it.
I'm not going to do any sticking; I'll just show you what I did.
And 2255, which has the purple top. And ask, with the Court's permission, if you might stand. If you feel up to that, and show the jury exactly what you did, and explain to them, let's say, with my arm, if you want, where the calibration was.
Yes, sir.
Here, when I talk about the bevel of the needle -- (indicating to the jury) -- being up so I can see it --
So I could see the bevel.
See how the bevel is there? You always want to watch that. (Indicating.)
Okay. Don't talk to the jury; just show them the bevel.
Can all the jurors at the far end, can you see the bevel that the witness referred to as the bevel?
I put the needle in the arm. When I knew I was in the vein, I started pulling the blood out.
At about this point (indicating) somewhere around this point, it stopped.
I could have done this. (Indicating.)
I asked the officer, does it look like we've got enough blood that you guys want?
Yes. You can do DNA in that small amount. (Indicating)
So I withdraw the syringe, put a band-aid on Mr. Simpson's arm, and then took -- put this back on (indicating to purple cap.) Took this.
Took the vacutainer and stuck the needle -- I'm not going to stick it in there, but I jabbed it right in there. There's a vacuum in there, and it sucks the blood right in.
As soon as I did that, without looking at this anymore, I took the syringe and deposited it into a receptacle we have for contaminated syringes, handed this to the officer -- that's the vacutainer I handed to the officer.
Mr. Peratis, or Nurse Peratis, I want to ask you one other question.
Could you show the jury the position of the calibration as you were putting the needle into Mr. Simpson's arm.
The calibrations were down, because the bevel was up, you have to watch the bevel when -- when you go into a vein.
And then when you removed the needle, did you turn the syringe over to look at the calibrations?
Mr. Medvene, if you're going to go into this, I'm going to let them go into collection techniques.
On certain people, I make an evaluation on an arm, and when certain people are pretty muscular, the veins are a little hard to get, and it's a little hard to control with the vacutainer, and it's easier to control with the syringe.
(BY MR. MEDVENE) And is it accurate that you don't and haven't measured how much blood you draw when you do -- presently use the syringe?
Now, let's go to the experiment that you discussed with Mr. Blasier.
Did anyone from the District Attorney's office ask you to do any experiment of any kind to see how much blood you drew to get an exact amount?
Well, after I heard -- after I heard what I heard about the blood missing, I put 8 cc's in one of these things to see what it looked like, and it was more than what it looked like I had -- I handed to them.
So I withdraw some blood until it looked like what I had I handed to them, and it came out within -- between that six and six and a half cc's, which I just measured. I was just drawing one cc at a time out, until it looked like what it was.
But it was still an estimation.
And how did you do the measurements?
What did you physically do?
Did you take a cc and drop it in a certain amount at a time?
Okay.
I pulled up 8 cc's of water. I squirted it into that. Like, it was too much. I pulled out one cc, dumped it out. Pulled out another cc, dumped it out. And it looked like between there.
After I took it out, the 2 cc's, it looked like a little bit more than 6 cc's. I estimated about six and a half cc's, and that was it.
Now, when you gave the testimony that was read to you at the preliminary hearing about the 8 cc's, you also said at that time that nobody asked you to take a precise amount of blood; isn't that correct.
You also said at that time when you talked about how much blood you thought you withdraw, that nobody had asked you to take out a precise amount of blood; isn't that correct?
Now, why -- why did you give that estimate, then, that you gave about the 8 cc's, and tell us now you think it was six, six and a half, did you ever measure before, for example, to see if it was 8 cc's?
(BY MR. MEDVENE) Have you ever, prior to the time you testified at the preliminary hearing and the grand jury, had you ever measured the amount of blood that you would withdraw from someone's arm?
Up to this time, I think that anyone that would draw blood, if they were asked that question, think of 8 cc's as about the amount that we draw. And that is about the first thing they think. And that was the first thing that came out of my mouth. The correct answer at that time should have been, "I don't know how much I drew."
No, I didn't, really; didn't really know; it was a guess. It was an educated guess, you might say. I happened to be wrong in that case. Many times I would have been right.
And after -- And so that the record's clear, you went through and performed the test, and for the first time, actually measured, or attempted to measure how much blood you withdrew, and you did that on your own?
And it was after that, that you shared this information with Mr. Blasier and another defense counsel, Mr. Neufeld, and Ms. Joanne Dimitri; they're jury consultants. You did that?
And you also then had occasion, for the first time, to tell Mr. Goldberg, the District Attorney?
I had told Mr. Goldberg, but I hadn't shown him before I showed it to Mr. -- Mr. Goldberg at my home. [sic]
Okay. Let me move then, if I can, to the cut on the middle finger, the left hand.
Mr. Blasier had read you certain portions of the transcript. And if I might, Your Honor, I'd just like to read three brief portions to put that portion in context, if I might, from the deposition transcript, the questioning by Mr. Blasier.
At page 87, I'm going to read from line 14, through page 88, line 1. I believe Mr. Blasier read up to line 19, but to put it in context, I'll read that whole section.
At some point -- A question by Mr. Blasier: "Q. At some point, were you
asked to do something with respect to
Mr. Simpson's hand or hands? "A. Not hand. I -- I may
have heard from Mr. Vannatter. I put
the dressing -- I went to put a dressing
on Mr. Simpson's arm and he said, I
don't need that. So . . . "Q. (BY MR. BLASIER) Who
said that? "A. Mr. Simpson. I wanted to
put a pressure dressing. He said he
didn't need it. So I heard a voice -- I
thought it was Phil, but it may not have
been -- 'do you mind checking his
finger,' or words to that effect."
At page 89 lines -- line 1, through page 90, I believe, line 4. "Q. (BY MR. BLASIER)
Somebody said do you mind checking his
finger? What's your best recollection of
the exact words that were used? "A. 'Could you take a look at
the finger,' something like that. "I can't -- You know, it
was just in passing. And I said 'sure.'
All I did was take a look at it and kind
of, like a courtesy I'd give to any
officer that's cut or something, just
gave it a -- cleaned it off and dressed
it. "Q. When you heard someone
say, 'will you take a look at his
finger,' did you say anything? "A. I think I said yes. "Q. Did anyone tell you which
finger to look at? "A. Not that I know. I
think -- Which finger are -- are -- are
we talking about? I don't know how it
got that -- Maybe Mr. Simpson had me
look at his finger or whatever. I just
looked at it. I mean, it was there. I
looked at it. "Q. Did you look at his hand? "A. No. "Q. How did you know which
finger to look at, if you know. "A. It was obvious. You
could see it was obvious. "Q. How was it obvious? "A. It was a -- it was a --
looked like a kind of older -- an old
scratch or old cut, looked like a little
skin had been kind of scraped off." And
then "(Indicating.)"
And then counsel makes reference or says, "The witness is pointing to the middle finger of the left hand when he was describing the finger Mr. Simpson showed him. " "Q. Now, when you said it
looked like an old cut, what did you
mean? "A. It could have been
something about 12, 24 hours old. It's
a little hard to judge those things.
And then two other quick portions at page 94, lines 15 through 18. "Q. Were you looking --
It's rehabilitation for what Mr. Blasier said. It's putting in context what Mr. Blasier read.
(Reading:) "Q. Were you looking at his
hand when you cleaned the finger? "A. Only the finger that I
was cleaning."
And the last portion, at page 94, line -- looks like 25 through page 96, line 1. "Q. Because you didn't
observe anything else that required any
kind of medical attention; is that
right? "A. I -- I didn't look."
When I found out I was wrong, I changed my story.
The correct answer at that time should have been, 'I don't know how much I drew.'
It was an educated guess, you might say. I happened to be wrong in that case. Many times I would have been right.
It was a -- it was a -- looked like a kind of older -- an old scratch or old cut, looked like a little skin had been kind of scraped off.
That seems to be one of the things he does for a living.