My recollection is, I'm precluded from going into that business where drying the plastic bag, have that shown as if it was wet, but I think I have--I was allowed to elicit that it took approximately four hours for the gloves to dry because what he's going to testify to--and that has to do with a factually present condition for the shrinkage, that he replicated the temperature and humidity for the drying conditions. That's the whole point.
I thought the court was very specific. I went back over the ruling, that that was not substantially similar conditions and that's why the drying time was not, foundationally speaking, reliable and I thought that was--
All right. Counsel, what I'm allowing is an experiment regarding whether or not smearing of blood can cause this type of shrinkage. Drying time is something specifically excluded. All right.
KEY QUOTEI think, your Honor, you have found that the conditions he used were substantially the same. You made a specific finding.
I think I have--I was allowed to elicit that it took approximately four hours for the gloves to dry because what he's going to testify to--and that has to do with a factually present condition for the shrinkage, that he replicated the temperature and humidity for the drying conditions.
What I'm allowing is an experiment regarding whether or not smearing of blood can cause this type of shrinkage. Drying time is something specifically excluded.
And I'm telling you drying time is off limits. All right.