tense The prosecution continued its rebuttal case with testimony from FBI forensic experts Douglas Deedrick and William Bodziak, both specifically countering Henry Lee's defense conclusions. The day was dominated by aggressive cross-examination from Barry Scheck, who systematically challenged Deedrick's credibility on fabric imprints and an undocumented observation about knife damage to Ron Goldman's shirt. Questions emerged about witness conditioning, undocumented findings, and whether experts were stepping outside their areas of expertise.
- Teresa Ramirez testified that prosecutor Goldberg had prior unrecorded contact with witness Peratis before the defense-monitored videotape session, suggesting pre-conditioning.
- FBI fiber expert Deedrick admitted he wrote his report before physically examining the jeans and initially made no test impressions, undermining his methodology.
- Scheck exposed that Deedrick had no bloodstain pattern expertise yet offered conclusions about bloody fabric imprints—a critical credibility blow.
- Deedrick testified he observed knife damage to Ron Goldman's shirt in August 1994 but never documented, photographed, or reported this finding.
- FBI shoeprint expert Bodziak systematically rebutted Henry Lee's shoeprint theory, explaining why the crime scene markings couldn't be shoe impressions.
- Prosecution signaled its rebuttal case was nearly complete, with possible conclusion by next day or Monday.