(BY MR. KELLY) Mr. Rubin, were you aware of a SKU number that was assigned to this style of glove by Bloomingdale's for sales purposes.
Well, the first two digits reflected the fact that it was a men's leather glove, and the next few digits are sequential as part of the design process. Each new design was the next number.
I don't want Mr. Kelly to feel disadvantaged by the fact I keep telling him to move over. I know it's kind of annoying, sometimes, to have somebody standing behind you talking. And I'm trying to make it comfortable for the jurors, so that none of the attorneys stand behind the jurors when they're talking.
So I'm asking all of the attorneys to stay well to the right of that last juror.
(BY MR. KELLY) Do you have any personal knowledge as to whether or not the list price in Bloomingdale's for the Aris men's leather lights had been changed at all in December of 1990?
Well, I have to ask you, specifically, do you have your own knowledge whether that list price had been changed in December of 1990?
Would it be fair to say that two pair of those gloves at $55 each, reduced by 30 percent, would be a total of --
Now, I want to go back to Exhibits 129 and 204 a little bit.
Do you have those in front of you still?
I recognized them long before the criminal trial, but I do recognize these from the criminal trial, yes.
Okay.
And did you have occasion, when you were testifying in the criminal trial, to observe Mr. Simpson's conduct, a demonstration where he was asked to put the gloves on?
I'm going to object. That misstates the evidence.
The prosecution and the judge ordered Mr. Simpson to put those gloves on.
(BY MR. KELLY) Were you able to --
You actually saw him conduct that demonstration himself, where he did put the gloves on; is that correct?
And when you say they fit with a poor quality, what do you base that opinion on, the poor-quality aspect?
And do you have an opinion as to what would have caused them to be that one inch shorter in the wrist?
In this particular case, there were two issues: One was the fact that he was required to.
I move to strike as nonresponsive, Your Honor, as to his opinion, not the issues in the case.
-- in a north/south position.
The second factor was that there was a requirement to utilize latex linings over the hands prior to putting the gloves on.
And the third issue was that the actual overall condition of the gloves, being crumbled up quite a bit and not straightened out, I would call it refurbished. It's really just they hadn't been used in a long, long time.
(BY MR. KELLY) And those were the three factors that you base your opinion on; is that correct?
Okay.
And I believe earlier, you mentioned -- you stated your reasons for the apparent difference of one inch between the normal length of the extra large glove and these gloves when you measured them.
(BY MR. KELLY) While you are on this, Mr. Rubin, if you can, take a look at the characteristics we used earlier, the stitching and the three needle points on the back of the hand, et cetera.
One would be the unique stitching, sewing the glove completely together.
Two is this blind hem at the end of the wrist.
The blind hem at the end of the wrist. Then the other more common characteristics are the three, needle points, where there are actually three needles with thread that create these design elements.
And then there's a palm vent in the wrist.
And then there's this thin cashmere lining, ten-gauge liner.
Okay.
Are you able to tell me, after looking at all those specific characteristics, what type of glove it is?
It says the name and the size and the content and manufacturer; it does not say the style number.
Okay.
Now, have you had an opportunity to look at the inside of the lining of the glove, underneath?
If you recall still, are there any identifying characteristics or anything that appear on the lining of the -- the inside of that glove?
The cutter number is the actual individual who was given the leather to cut X amount of pair of this style during the manufacturing process. It was a way of controlling the leather.
The sequence number was to keep all the parts together so that the colors matched, because they did vary across the skins. They would actually -- the cutter would say, this is the first pair; I made the second, the third, the fourth. And he would keep all the parts together. That way -- this was nine pair of that particular lot of leather that was given to the cutter.
I'm going ask you to look at 204, which would be the right-hand glove there.
Also, if you can go through the same process, first of all, of trying it on.
I don't understand why he's trying it on, Your Honor. I don't understand why this is relevant to any issue in this case.
(BY MR. KELLY) Now, while you're trying that glove on and looking at it, I'm going to ask you to examine it closely once again for all the specific characteristics we discussed before.
That's the Brossar stitch and the three-point needles -- the three needle points; I'm sorry, and the lined hem and the other things?
Okay.
And are you able to tell me with certainty who the manufacturer of that glove is, also?
First of all, can you tell me, without looking at the label, Mr. Rubin, who made that glove?
Okay.
Now, I see you're already doing it. I was going to ask you to look inside the lining of that glove, also, for those identifying characteristics.
Yes. The cutter number was 359; the sequence number is 9; and the size is XL, makes it a pair.
As a result of looking at those identifying characteristics of the two gloves, are you able to tell me what, if any, relationship there is between the two of those gloves?
(BY MR. KELLY) Mr. Rubin, also in the criminal trial that we discussed earlier, you had the opportunity to view a number of photographs, also, did you not?
And in addition to viewing them in court, did you make some sort of independent investigation and examination of those photos, also?
(BY MR. KELLY) This is basically the close-up of the picture you were looking at a second ago, Mr. Rubin.
Could you examine the glove closely that's blurred on the screen right now?
(BY MR. KELLY) I'm going ask you if you can look at this and identify the specific characteristics of the manufacturer of that particular glove.
The very fine rib stitches, which is indicative of the Brossar stitch; the vent in the palm; and then on the lower left, if you see where the shadow is, it would appear to be that the hem didn't have any stitching on it; it was a blind hem.
Okay.
And based on those characteristics, are you able to conclude the manufacture and make model and style of that particular glove?
And based on the type of stitching, would you be able to opine as to when that was manufactured, approximately?
The bulk of the gloves that we made Brossar stitches on were made in the late '80s. So '88, '89, '90.
KEY QUOTE(BY MR. KELLY) By the way, that picture that was just taken down. What color was that glove?
(BY MR. KELLY) The previous glove -- I'm sorry, Mr. Rubin. I'm going put this photo back up one more time.
I'm going to ask you, excluding color, would you be able to tell me how it compares to Exhibit 129 and 204, the gloves in front of you now?
(BY MR. KELLY) Now, I'd ask you to look at that glove in that photo, first of all, Mr. Rubin.
The Brossar stitching and the three needle points that is in the middle of the glove to the left.
Looking at that photo, are you able to observe any of the specific characteristics we're speaking of?
Just the Brossar stitching at the top of the gloves, where it goes around -- around the top.
Okay.
And based on those, I believe you referred to them as "unique details;" is that right?
Are you able to reach a conclusion as to the manufacture, make, and model and style of that glove?
Both -- that is the most unique detail to style 70263, so I would say this is a style 70263.
Okay.
And excluding color, can you tell me how that glove compares to the two gloves there in front of you, the 129 and 204, the right-hand and left-hand gloves?
(BY MR. KELLY) I'll ask you to take a look at that glove.
Tell me when you can observe any of the specific characteristics we've been speaking of.
In this glove, I can see the Brossar stitching around the fingers, the three needle points down -- down the back of the glove. And then actually, it appears that the Aris label is actually sticking out, to the left bottom.
But that is not an unusual characteristic; that just happens to be there because every Aris glove had a label.
I cannot read anything on the label.
It appears to be in the same location that we put our labels in, compared to other manufacturers, and it appears to be the color that we use, compared to other manufacturers. So I believe it's an Aris glove.
Okay.
And even excluding the tag altogether, would you be able to identify that from the other specific characteristics you spoke of before?
And in looking in that glove, would you tell me how that compares to the two gloves you have there in front of you, also?
Is that better, to use a picture?
Actually, if I could hand this to the witness first, Judge.
Why don't you lay it flat here for reference.
If you could, zoom in a little on the gloves, Steve.
(BY MR. KELLY) Now, looking at that glove, both on the screen and the enlargement before you, are you able to observe any of the specific characteristics we've been discussing before?
I can see the Brossar stitching on the photo.
I really can't see it on this screen, but I can see the blind hem and the points in both places.
The Brossar stitching on the top of the forefinger at the top, and the three point, and the blind hem.
And also the characteristics of the light leather shows -- up here, where you can see the wrinkles, you can see that it's very thin.
(BY MR. KELLY) Are you able to see the -- any of the specific characteristics from that photo?
I've identified the photo before on the screen. I'm not -- I can't say that I can identify much on the screen.
(BY MR. KELLY) Okay.
Are you able, from that photograph there, to identify the -- any of the specific characteristics we've been speaking of?
I can see the fine ridge of the Brossar stitching on a couple -- on a couple of the fingers, and I can see the point.
I'm going ask you to put up pictures 645 and 646 again, see if they're clearer there.
Yes, I can see on both photos. I can see the Brossar stitching, the points and the blind hem from these photos.
Actually, let me take them back from you.
Steve, if I could see 654, please, if we go to frame 4583.
(BY MR. KELLY) I ask you to look specifically at the left-hand glove in that picture, Mr. Rubin.
Can you make any observation as to specific characteristics we discussed before with regard to that glove?
In the palm of the hand, there's usually a vent that would help a person slip the gloves on and off a little bit more easily and gives you something to pull on.
With 129 or 204, could you hold one of those up for the jury and demonstrate, if you could, what the palm vent is?
I've shown you -- if we could go to, Steve, 5548, 49.
If you could look at the --
Take it back down, Steve.
Stop right there.
(BY MR. KELLY) Are you able to make an observation -- I don't know if it's real clear -- as to the right-hand glove?
(BY MR. KELLY) Would you agree with me that all of these photographs were the same time, place -- same place?
Wait. I object. He is asking this witness to say that all these photographs were at the same time and the same place.
(BY MR. KELLY) Okay.
With regard to 641, once again, which would be the enlargement down here --
(BY MR. KELLY) Could you state for me all the specific characteristics of the Aris men's leather light that you're able to observe between those two photographs?
The Brossar stitching on the fingers closing the glove down the side, the three needle points, and the blind hem and the palm vent.
And based on those specific characteristics you just mentioned, are you able to tell me with certainty what the manufacture, make, model and style of those gloves are?
Okay.
Can you tell me how that 70263 Aris men's leather light brown, those gloves depicted in those photographs, compare to the two gloves you have in front of you there?
They fit with a poor quality of fit, but they fit.
They are a pair.
No doubt about it.
The prosecution and the judge ordered Mr. Simpson to put those gloves on.
The bulk of the gloves that we made Brossar stitches on were made in the late '80s. So '88, '89, '90.