All right. Thank you, ladies and gentlemen. Please be seated. Mr. Rokahr, would you resume the witness stand, please. All right. The record should reflect we have been rejoined by all the members of our jury panel. And, Mr. Neufeld, you may continue.
Mr. Rokahr, when Detective Fuhrman initially approached you, was he alone at that point?
In other words, it was scenes where he was the detective and you were simply the--let me simply start.
And you were the Los Angeles Police Department official photographer for crime scenes?
Ad approximately how many crime scenes did you work with Detective Fuhrman over those five years?
Now, going back to the--the questions I was asking you just before the break, sir, when you take these pictures, is there a way that you can determine what the sequence of each picture is?
Well, each of the photographers have a set way of taking photographs. When you mention to me whether he instructed me on taking certain photographs, on the evidence, yes, he did.
I'm simply asking, is there a method, a technical method that you can determine a sequence in which photographs are taken?
When we arrive at a crime scene, there is a data back on the back of my camera and I can set, as far as the counter is concerned, six numbers, 000000. From then on, it will count up every shot that is taken. It adds a number, a digit to it.
Okay. Now, in this particular instance, can you by looking in your book tell us what the numbers were in sequence of the two photographs you took of Detective Mark Fuhrman pointing at the glove?
That means that those are the 34th and 35th pictures that you took at Bundy that night?
Now, before the break, sir, I asked you about the very next several pictures. Do you recall that?
Okay. Now, what I want you to do is look at photographs 36, in other words, the one immediately after 35, where Fuhrman is pointing at the glove, all the way through 43. Do you see those?
Okay. Now, isn't it a fact, sir, that when you took those photographs, the first eight photographs after Fuhrman is pointing at the glove, that as to those eight photographs, you were not having any detective instruct you as to what to shoot, but you were simply relying on your own professional judgment? Isn't that a fact?
Yes, I would say it's a fact because of the--the sequence in these photographs, which is the way I shoot.
Okay. Thank you. Now, you said earlier to the jury that you were using Kodak color print film asa 200; is that correct?
Okay. And on this night, when you were at Bundy shooting, you were using rolls of 36?
Okay. Now, if one wanted to, one could take the first 36 negatives or the first 35 negatives, however many negatives are on the first roll of film, and print them; could they not?
And if you printed the first roll of film, then anyone who wanted to know what the sequence of photographs were would be able to ascertain that; would they not?
Sir, I'd ask you to take a look at Defendant's 1366 in evidence, and if you'd like, you can compare it to the photographs you have in your blue book. And the question I have for you, sir, first of all is, can you see the number--by the way, you mentioned that the--that there's a counter which numbers each photograph.
When the roll of film is printed, do those numbers appear on each and every print?
It depends what the background is on the negative. If the background is very light, they're quite often difficult to see.
But other than the fact that it may be difficult to see, is it the procedure that that number that you use on the counter will appear in the print?
Okay. And in fact, in that exhibit which I have shown you, do the numbers appear in the lower right-hand corner?
Okay. But can you tell the number because of the print that is directly in front of it or directly before it?
Okay. And, sir, if you'd like to compare it to your album, please go right ahead. But the question I have for you is, does this sheet--except for the fact that the images are slightly larger than they would be if it was a direct contact, does this page reflect the sequence of photographs on the very first roll of film that you shot that night at Bundy?
And, sir, do the first--by the way, how many exposures did you get out of that first roll?
It depends on how the camera on its first--on its first advance advances or depending on how far I have pushed the film into its position.
In this particular roll, do you notice that the last shot on the roll is item no. 35--not item number, but photograph no. 35?
Yeah. Either the next roll or the last negative. I may have reloaded walking around to the front of the building.
Okay. So, sir, to the best of your recollection--I'm sorry. To the best of your recollection, would this contact sheet, except for the fact that the actual negatives are slightly larger when they're printed there than they would be on a routine contact sheet, do they represent the first roll of film you shot that night at Bundy?
And the first 33 frames on that roll, those would be those overall shots you talked about that you took between approximately, oh, 3:25 and say 3:55 in the morning?
Okay. And the last two shots that appear on there, those would be the two shots that you took sometime between 4:20 and 4:35 in the morning; is that correct?
Sir, didn't you--didn't you say just before the break that the time that the photographs were taken of Detective Fuhrman pointing at the glove, given the times that you gave for the other events that evening, would be somewhere between 4:20 and 4:35 in the morning?
I probably did. I have frankly no recollection as to the actual times involved.
KEY QUOTESir, yesterday, when you were interviewed by me, were you interviewed by me for approximately an hour and a half?
And would it be fair to say that the majority of that time, you were giving a narrative of what happened, the order it happened and the times it happened on June 13th of 1994? Isn't that correct?
Yes. Why don't you ask him--you want to ask him a question about the frame numbers?
Aside from the number in the lower right-hand corner of the actual print, is there also a number beneath the print which indicates which frame it was or which shot it was in the roll?
Well, no. Are there numbers below each print there that would show you it is the third frame or the fourth frame or the sixth frame?
Your Honor, before I publish it, I would like to use the elmo, and I think we have to cut the feed.
Just a couple questions first. Sir, in the--those establishment, location, overall shots, whatever you want to call it, those first 33 shots, in those 33 shots, you used the flash?
And the--and in addition to the flash, there were streetlights that to some extent or other artificial lights that were there that illuminated the scene as well; is that correct?
And you can see the illumination given off by those other lights in these various prints; can you not?
All right. And when you shot the two photographs of Detective Fuhrman pointing at the glove, as to those two shots, you shot those with a flash; did you not?
Okay. And by the way, all the other photographs on that first roll, 1 through 33, those were all shot at nighttime; isn't that correct?
And those were the last two pictures you took on that first roll of film during the night at Bundy on June 13th--in the early morning hours of June 13th, 1994?
KEY QUOTEThat's what he--your Honor, at this time, I have no further questions. I would like to pose--I would like to pass this to the jury so they can at least look at it.
All right. The record should reflect each of the jurors has taken the opportunity to view Defense exhibit 1366. Mr. Darden, you may cross-examine.
That would be 34 and 35.
I probably did. I have frankly no recollection as to the actual times involved.
And those were the last two pictures you took on that first roll of film during the night at Bundy on June 13th--in the early morning hours of June 13th, 1994?