📄 Redirect examination of Comm. Keith Bushey (part 2) — Wednesday, September 20, 1995
Address:
C:\DEPT103\CRIMINAL\1995\SEP\20\REDIRECT-EXAMINATION-OF-COMM-K.DOC
TRIAL
▲ Day 158 of 167

Redirect examination of Comm. Keith Bushey (part 2)

Witness: Comm. Keith Bushey
Examiner: Marcia Clark
Called by: Prosecution • Date: Wednesday, September 20, 1995 • Utterances: 34
Marcia Clark conducts a brief redirect of Commander Bushey, focusing on why OJ Simpson was prioritized for personal notification of the murders despite not being next of kin. Bushey explains the decision was driven by Simpson's proximity, his accessibility, and above all the presence of his children at the scene. Judge Ito cuts off Clark's attempted question about activities at the West L.A. station the following morning as beyond scope.
1 (The following proceedings were held in open court:)
2 THE COURT:

Anything new?

3 MS. CLARK:

Yes.

4 MS. CLARK:

In your experience, sir, notification to the family takes approximately how long?

5 COMMANDER BUSHEY:

Well, they usually take place after the investigators are through at the initial crime scene.

6 MS. CLARK:

Does notification usually take several hours?

7 MR. COCHRAN:

Object, your Honor. This calls for speculation. Each case is different.

8 THE COURT:

Overruled, overruled.

9 COMMANDER BUSHEY:

Well, each case is a little bit different and it certainly depends on the availability of the person being contacted. There are times when it is a knock on the door and there is a clergyman there, the family is there, and there are times when it can be quite a laborious process, depending on how many people are involved and the degree of grief that is experienced.

10 MS. CLARK:

Now, I think you indicated before that one of the reasons that you asked that the Defendant be personally notified first was your knowledge that he lived nearby?

11 COMMANDER BUSHEY:

I seem to recall that I was aware that he lived nearby.

12 MS. CLARK:

So he would be easiest to reach, was that your thinking?

13 COMMANDER BUSHEY:

Yeah, that plus the fact that his children were there caused me to--to form that opinion.

KEY QUOTE
14 MS. CLARK:

So even though, legally speaking, sir, he was not next of kin, why was it--

15 MR. COCHRAN:

This is leading and suggestive, your Honor.

16 THE COURT:

No, it is not.

17 MS. CLARK:

What was that?

18 THE COURT:

No, it is not.

19 MS. CLARK:

Thank you. I'm sorry, I couldn't hear you. Thank you, your Honor.

20 MS. CLARK:

Even though, legally speaking, he was not next of kin, sir, you indicated that you felt it was important to notify the Defendant first?

21 COMMANDER BUSHEY:

Well, that was--seemed to be the person we could probably get ahold of first, because the children being there, the prominent person, belief that he lived in that area. He seemed to be somebody who was accessible.

22 MS. CLARK:

And the children, did they play a large part in your concern for notification?

23 MR. COCHRAN:

Leading and suggestive, your Honor.

24 THE COURT:

Overruled.

25 COMMANDER BUSHEY:

Absolutely.

26 MS. CLARK:

Did you go to the station the following morning?

27 COMMANDER BUSHEY:

I--

28 THE COURT:

This is--wait, wait. This is way beyond the scope of notification at 2:30 in the morning.

29 MS. CLARK:

It is the subject of notification.

30 THE COURT:

Activities at West L.A. Station the next morning are not. Proceed.

KEY QUOTE
31 (Discussion held off the record between the Deputy District Attorneys.)
32 MS. CLARK:

All right. I have nothing further.

33 MR. COCHRAN:

Just a couple more questions, your Honor.

34 THE COURT:

Proceed.

Temperature

procedural

Key Quotes (3)

Comm. Keith Bushey
that plus the fact that his children were there caused me to--to form that opinion.
Bushey frames the decision to notify Simpson first as child-welfare driven, not investigative convenience — a sympathetic framing for the prosecution.
Comm. Keith Bushey
He seemed to be somebody who was accessible.
Summarizes the rationale for notifying Simpson first: proximity, prominence, and accessibility — undercutting any suggestion of investigative targeting.
Lance A. Ito
Activities at West L.A. Station the next morning are not. Proceed.
Judge narrows the permitted scope of redirect, blocking Clark from extending into the morning-after timeline.

Notable Exchanges (2)

Marcia ClarkLance A. Ito
Clark attempts to ask about activities at West L.A. Station the next morning; Ito cuts her off sua sponte as beyond the scope of the redirect, prompting a brief off-record discussion among prosecutors before Clark abandons the line.
procedural
Marcia ClarkLance A. Ito
After Cochran's 'leading and suggestive' objection is overruled, Clark couldn't hear the judge's ruling and asked him to repeat it — a small moment of courtroom awkwardness.
routine

Light Moments (1)

Marcia Clark
Clark mishears the judge's overruling and has to ask him to repeat himself: 'What was that?' / 'No, it is not.' / 'Thank you. I'm sorry, I couldn't hear you.'

Objections

3 objections (0 sustained, 3 overruled)
Proceeding 7790 • 34 utterances • Prosecution witness
Criminal Trial
Department 103
⚖️ Start
📂 SEP 20, 1995 📄 Redirect examination of Comm.
SEP 20, 1995 KRT DvH TD