All right. Thank you, ladies and gentlemen. Please be seated. All right. Let the record reflect we've been rejoined by all the members of our jury panel. Mr. Richard Rubin is again on the witness stand undergoing redirect examination by Mr. Darden. And, counsel, if you recollect, we need to conclude before the jury today at 4:00 o'clock due to some doctors' and dentist appointments.
Mr. Rubin, you testified regarding the issue or on the issue of whether or not you saw any defects or anything unusual in the gloves shown in the photographs; is that correct?
Okay. Was there any defect at all in any of the brown gloves shown in the photographs shown to the jury that you saw?
Okay. So there's no defect that you saw on the Rockingham or Bundy gloves shown in the photographs here in court today?
And did you speak with him after the jury left and after court adjourned yesterday?
And toward that end, did you do anything to make yourself available to Mr. Blasier so that you could talk to him?
I've chosen really not to do anything in that manner whatsoever. I'm really just here to tell about the gloves in respect to all the details of the gloves, and that's really all I can bring to the table here.
Okay. And the Renken photograph that we just passed along to the jury, that was the photograph that--when you were concerned--where you were concerned about the mink or brown coloring; is that correct?
Since day one, you're well-aware that I worked with you regarding my testimony here and I--
When you saw photographs back in July, did you ask to see other photographs or additional photographs?
I wanted to be as accurate as possible in any statement that I might make before this court.
And when you said that the crime scene gloves seemed to have been worn infrequently, what did you mean by that exactly?
I was somewhat surprised that with the wear and tear on the Rockingham glove, that the lining seemed so close in similarity to the Bundy glove when I first saw them for the first time because the Rockingham glove was very distorted and somewhat mutilated. I was actually somewhat taken by surprise when we did open up the glove and found out that it was a pair, and the only thing that connected the two was the same wear and tear in the lining, because there is a big difference currently between the Rockingham glove and the Bundy glove.
Now, you don't know what testing procedures, what tests were applied to the Rockingham and Bundy glove, do you?
At any event, you don't know what, if anything, any criminalist may have done to these gloves; is that right?
I do not. My observations were just part of the linings that I could see clearly, certain areas of the lining on both gloves.
Now, when you testified that the brown gloves shown in the photographs in the video were Aris style no. 70263, were you forming those opinions based solely on a single characteristic of the gloves that you saw?
My complete analysis of these photos was a collective effort. As we well know, there were many that I rejected because I couldn't see enough, and some of them were included in evidence here today, which was sufficient enough for me to state that these photos represent the characteristics that are part of style 70263.
KEY QUOTEWould the use of a heat pack cause the glove to shrink or expand, that is assuming they were dry?
Technically, the worst thing that can affect the size of a glove is a combination of water and heat; generally water first, heat second. If the gloves were wet at any point in time and a heat pack--
Okay. Well, what would happen if there was a heat pack in the glove and the glove was wet?
You've already testified about shrinkage and what causes gloves to shrink; is that correct?
And we see that in the January 6th, 1991 photograph and in the photograph we just showed the jury the brown gloves are wet; is that right?
Let's assume for a moment there was a heat pack in the glove, one of those gloves on January 6th, 1991 while the glove was wet. What effect would that have on the glove in terms of shrinkage?
Depending upon the amount of liquid and the location of the heat pack and the actual temperature of the heat pack, it could speed up some slight shrinkage.
And you can't tell us what effect blood will have on a glove in terms of whether it will cause it to shrink, and if so, how much, right?
Okay. Now, when we passed around that Bill Renken photograph, did you want the jury to--
Let me show you the photograph that was taken by Debra Guidera, exhibit number 612, as well as the glove the Defendant tried on, exhibit 401. How do they compare in color?
This particular photograph and this particular glove are extremely close in actual color.
Okay. And showing you what has been marked as 164-A, the glove found at Rockingham, the glove found behind the Defendant's home, are both of the gloves in your presence and in front of you as well as the gloves shown on the Defendant's hand in these photographs, are they all brown?
Do they appear to be mink at all, that is any of the gloves as well as the gloves shown in the photograph?
Your Honor, I have nothing further. I would ask, however, that the jury be allowed to take a look at the Guidera photograph as well as the crime scene glove for color comparison.
Miss Clark--I'm sorry. Mr. Darden, let's--loan me the elmo gizmo. All right. Lay them on the elmo gizmo there. Lay them out, please. All right. And would you hand that, please, to juror no. 1.
I have no reason to be here.
I stayed there all night.
These three gloves are categorically brown.
My complete analysis of these photos was a collective effort. As we well know, there were many that I rejected because I couldn't see enough, and some of them were included in evidence here today, which was sufficient enough for me to state that these photos represent the characteristics that are part of style 70263.
I was actually somewhat taken by surprise when we did open up the glove and found out that it was a pair, and the only thing that connected the two was the same wear and tear in the lining.