ALL RIGHT. HERE'S OUR FIRST WITNESS.
DAVID ADKINS (402), CALLED AS A WITNESS BY THE DEFENDANT, PURSUANT TO EVIDENCE CODE SECTION 402, WAS SWORN AND TESTIFIED AS FOLLOWS:
RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND. YOU DO SOLEMNLY SWEAR THAT THE TESTIMONY YOU MAY GIVE IN THE CAUSE NOW PENDING BEFORE THIS COURT SHALL BE THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH, AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH, SO HELP YOU GOD?
PLEASE HAVE A SEAT IN THE WITNESS STAND AND STATE AND SPELL YOUR FIRST AND LAST NAMES FOR THE RECORD.
I WOULD LIKE TO DIRECT YOUR ATTENTION BACK TO THE DATE OF JUNE 13TH, WHICH I BELIEVE WAS A MONDAY, OF 1994. DID YOU AT SOME TIME ON THAT DAY RECEIVE A CALL TO COME TO A LOCATION ON ROCKINGHAM IN THE BRENTWOOD AREA?
ALL RIGHT. AT THAT TIME, YOU WERE, AS I UNDERSTAND IT, EMPLOYED IN THE PHOTO LAB OF THE LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT. AND WHAT WAS YOUR -- WHAT WAS YOUR TITLE OR RANK THEREIN?
I'M THE OFFICER IN CHARGE OF THE SECTION. I MANAGE THE DAY-TO-DAY OPERATIONS OF THE PHOTOGRAPHIC SECTION.
ALL RIGHT. WHEN YOU GOT THIS CALL BETWEEN 1:30 AND 2:30, WHAT WAS THE -- WHAT WAS THE NATURE OF THE CALL? WHAT WERE YOU ASKED TO DO?
I RESPONDED BY TRYING TO LOCATE A PHOTOGRAPHER. THAT WAS A VERY BUSY DAY AND I HAD TO PULL SOMEBODY FROM OUR DISPATCHER TO TAKE THEM OUT TO THE SCENE.
ALL RIGHT. DO YOU HAVE ANY NOTES OR ANY REPORTS THAT WERE WRITTEN CONTEMPORANEOUSLY WITH YOUR OBSERVATIONS BACK ON JUNE 13TH, 1994?
SO EVERYTHING YOU'RE TESTIFYING ABOUT IS FROM YOUR INDEPENDENT -- YOUR RECOLLECTION, YOUR INDEPENDENT RECOLLECTION?
ALL RIGHT. SO YOUR BEST RECOLLECTION IS THAT YOU AND MR. FORD WENT OUT TO ROCKINGHAM TOGETHER AND ARRIVED THERE AT ABOUT WHAT TIME?
AND WERE YOU PRESENT WHEN ANY INSTRUCTIONS WERE GIVEN AS TO WHAT YOU WERE TO SHOOT AT ROCKINGHAM?
WHEN MR. FORD AND I FIRST ARRIVED, WE WERE MET BY DETECTIVE HARPER, AND HE EXPLAINED THAT THEY WANTED AN OVERALL OF THE EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR SHOTS, AND THEN HE HANDED US OFF TO DETECTIVE HARO.
ALL RIGHT. SO YOUR FIRST CONVERSATION WAS WITH DETECTIVE HARPER. AND WHAT DID HE SAY ABOUT THE EXTERIOR SHOTS HE WANTED YOU TO GET?
NOTHING SPECIFIC. HE JUST REQUESTED THEY WANTED GENERAL PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE EXTERIOR OF THE HOME.
AND WOULD YOU ASSUME THAT SINCE MR. FORD WAS GOING TO DO THE SHOOTING, HE WAS ALSO THERE TO HEAR THIS?
ALL RIGHT. AND AFTER YOUR INITIAL CONVERSATION WITH DETECTIVE HARPER, YOU THEN WERE TURNED OVER TO DETECTIVE HARO, H-A-R-O, RIGHT?
I DON'T SPECIFICALLY RECALL, BUT I THINK IT WAS OUTSIDE THE FRONT DOOR OF MR. SIMPSON'S HOME.
IT WAS A REITERATION OF THE FIRST INSTRUCTIONS, THAT THEY WOULD LIKE TO GET VIDEOTAPE OF THE EXTERIOR AS WELL AS THE INTERIOR OF THE HOME.
DID -- WERE YOU TOLD AT THIS POINT WHY YOU WERE DOING THIS, WHY WERE YOU SHOOTING OR ABOUT TO VIDEOTAPE THE SIMPSON HOME?
I DON'T RECALL SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS WERE GIVEN TO US AS TO WHY WE WERE PHOTOGRAPHING IT. MY UNDERSTANDING AS TO WHY WE WERE PHOTOGRAPHING IT WAS JUST TO DOCUMENT THE WAY THAT THE HOME LOOKED AT THIS POINT IN TERMS OF WHAT VEHICLES ARE THERE, WHAT LANDSCAPING IS THERE, AND ON THE INTERIOR, WHAT ITEMS ARE SITTING WHERE IN THE HOME.
AND DID YOU ALSO -- WERE YOU ALSO TOLD THAT YOU WANTED TO GET -- MAKE A RECORD OF EVERYTHING SEIZED BY THE POLICE PURSUANT TO A SEARCH WARRANT?
YOU DID NOT INDICATE THAT THIS MORNING? THAT WAS ONE OF THE THINGS THAT YOU INDICATED THAT YOU -- THAT WAS YOUR IMPRESSION?
DID YOU INDICATE THIS MORNING THAT ONE OF THE PURPOSES OF YOUR DOING THIS VIDEO WAS FOR CIVIL LIABILITY PURPOSES?
THERE HAVE BEEN CASES IN THE PAST WHEN POLICE OFFICERS HAVE HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO ENTER A HOME OR HAD AN OCCASION TO ENTER A HOME WHEN CLAIMS HAVE BEEN MADE AGAINST THE POLICE DEPARTMENT SUCH AS THINGS WERE MISSING, THERE WAS AN EXPENSIVE VASE THERE, THINGS OF THAT NATURE, THINGS WERE RUINED. WHAT WE LIKE TO DO IS COME IN AND DOCUMENT THE CONDITION OF THE HOME AT THAT TIME SO THAT IF IT WAS EVER NEEDED AGAIN, WE COULD SHOW THAT THAT WAS THERE, WAS NOT THERE.
KEY QUOTEWERE YOU ALSO -- DID YOU ALSO INDICATE THIS MORNING THAT ONE OF THE PURPOSES OF YOUR SHOOTING THE VIDEO WAS TO HELP THE DETECTIVES TO SEE WHERE ITEMS WERE RECOVERED?
ALL RIGHT. YOU HAD A CONVERSATION THIS MORNING WITH THE GENTLEMEN TO MY IMMEDIATE LEFT HERE, MR. SCHECK AND MR. NEUFELD; IS THAT CORRECT?
AFTER YOU TALKED TO THEM, DID YOU HAVE OCCASION TO TALK WITH SOME MEMBERS OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S STAFF THIS MORNING?
OKAY. AND SO DO YOU HAVE A RECOLLECTION THAT YOU INDICATED THIS MORNING THAT YOU -- THAT YOU SAID TO SCHECK AND NEUFELD TO -- THAT YOU -- YOUR RECORDATION, YOUR VIDEO RECORDATION WAS TO HELP THE DETECTIVES SEE IN THE FUTURE WHERE ITEMS WERE RECOVERED?
BY MR. COCHRAN: DID YOU EVER INDICATE TO EITHER MR. SCHECK OR NEUFELD THAT YOU WANTED TO MAKE A VIDEO RECORD SO THINGS WEREN'T SEIZED AND YOU WANTED TO GO BACK AT A FUTURE TIME AND SEIZE THEM, YOU WOULD HAVE AN ACTUAL RECORD OF WHERE THESE THINGS WERE? DID YOU EVER INDICATE THAT?
THE -- THE REASON THAT WE PHOTOGRAPHED THE INSIDE WAS, AS I MAINLY -- AS I STATED, MAINLY WAS FOR THE CIVIL LIABILITIES ISSUES.
SOMETIMES IF THE DETECTIVE IS REVIEWING THIS VIDEOTAPE AND NOTICES SOMETHING ELSE, THEY MAY WANT TO REVISIT THAT LOCATION.
KEY QUOTEALL RIGHT. SO TO PROVIDE SOME HELP FOR THE DETECTIVES IN LATER SEARCH WARRANTS IF THERE IS TO BE ONE OR WHERE THINGS ARE IN THE RESIDENCE, RIGHT?
ALL RIGHT. AND THE MAN WHO ACTUALLY SHOT THE TAPE IS, AS I UNDERSTAND IT, MR. WILLIE FORD; IS THAT CORRECT?
BY MR. COCHRAN: THE -- DO YOU REMEMBER WHAT KIND OF CAMERA MR. FORD WAS USING ON THAT DATE?
AND PRIOR TO THIS DATE OF JUNE 13TH, 1994, HAD YOU HAD OCCASION TO VIDEO OTHER CRIME SCENES IN YOUR CAPACITY IN THE PHOTO LAB AT LAPD?
BY MR. COCHRAN: HAVE THERE BEEN OTHER OCCASIONS WHERE INDIVIDUALS WHO WORK FOR YOU IN THE LAB OF THE LAPD BEEN ASKED TO VIDEO CRIME SCENES?
AND YOU DON'T RECALL ANY PARTICULAR REASON WHY THOSE FOUR WERE CHOSEN OR THERE WERE VIDEO SHOOTS ON THOSE FOUR?
WE WERE REQUESTED TO RESPOND WITH VIDEO, AND THAT'S THE REASON AS FAR AS MY LEVEL IS CONCERNED THAT WE -- THAT WE VIDEOTAPE THOSE.
ALL RIGHT. WOULD I BE CORRECT IN ASSUMING THAT BACK IN JUNE OF 1994, YOU DID NOT RESPOND TO EVERY CRIME SCENE IN LOS ANGELES TO VIDEO SHOOT, RIGHT?
ALL RIGHT. DID YOU EVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS CASE EVER GO TO THE BUNDY SCENE AND DO ANY VIDEO SHOOTING?
MR. ADKINS, IS THERE A POLICY OF THE LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT WHICH YOU'RE FAMILIAR WITH WHICH ALLOWS DETECTIVES AT THEIR DIR -- AT THEIR CHOICE TO EITHER HAVE STILL PHOTOS TAKEN OR VIDEOTAPES TAKEN OF LOCATIONS WHERE SEARCH WARRANTS ARE EXECUTED?
AND WHAT IS YOUR UNDERSTANDING WITH REGARD TO SEARCH WARRANTS BEING EXECUTED AND POSSIBLE CIVIL LIABILITY? DO YOU HAVE ONE IN THAT REGARD?
FOR PURPOSES AFTER THE FACT, AS I EXPLAINED BEFORE, TO SHOW THE CONDITION OF THE RESIDENCE AND THE CONDITION OF ART OBJECTS THAT MAY OR MAY NOT BE THERE.
AND WAS THAT YOUR UNDERSTANDING OF THE PURPOSE FOR YOUR PRESENCE AT ROCKINGHAM ON THAT PARTICULAR OCCASION, WAS TO DOCUMENT THE LOCATION OF ITEMS AND WHAT THOSE ITEMS LOOKED LIKE IN CASE OF FUTURE CIVIL LIABILITY?
WHEN YOU WERE AT THE ROCKINGHAM RESIDENCE ACCOMPANYING MR. FORD, WHO IS THE ONE WHO ACTUALLY TOOK THE VIDEOS, WAS THERE A POLICE DETECTIVE WITH YOU?
AND ARE YOU AWARE THAT THE LEAD INVESTIGATORS IN THIS CASE ARE DETECTIVES VANNATTER AND LANGE?
DID THE -- DID DETECTIVE HARO WHO ACCOMPANIED YOU, WHILE THE VIDEOTAPING WAS TAKING PLACE, DIRECT YOU TO VIDEOTAPE BLOOD DROPS ON THE DRIVEWAY?
DID THE VIDEOGRAPHER BASICALLY TAKE -- APPEAR TO BE POINTING HIS CAMERA AT OBJECTS, INCLUDING OBJECTS OF VALUE WITHIN WHAT MAY BE CALLED A TROPHY ROOM AT THE LOCATION?
BY MS. LEWIS: DID THE VIDEOGRAPHER APPEAR TO BE POINTING THE VIDEOTAPE CAMERA AT OBJECTS WITHIN THE LOCATION OF -- INCLUDING THOSE OF VALUE SUCH AS THE OBJECTS IN THE TROPHY ROOM?
SO IT WAS YOUR UNDERSTANDING THAT THIS VIDEO WAS TO BE TAKEN FOR PURPOSES OF POTENTIAL CIVIL LIABILITY IN THE FUTURE; IS THAT CORRECT?
DID YOU INDICATE THIS MORNING TO MR. NEUFELD THAT WITH REGARD TO THE FOUR OTHER CRIME SCENES THAT YOUR UNIT HAD BEEN ASKED TO VIDEO, THAT YOU SOMETIMES DID IT WHERE THE DETECTIVES THOUGHT IT WOULD HELP THEIR CASE? DID YOU INDICATE THAT?
ALL RIGHT. AND WERE YOU ASKED TO SHOOT BLOOD DROPS IN THE FOYER OF THE SIMPSON RESIDENCE THAT DAY?
AGAIN, I WAS NOT THE CAMERAMAN, BUT I WOULD SAY THAT THOSE VIDEO -- THOSE DROPS MAY HAVE BEEN IN THE VIDEO, BUT SPECIFIC EVIDENCE WAS NOT TO BE PHOTOGRAPHED.
I SEE. AND YOU WERE AWARE, WERE YOU NOT, THAT DETECTIVES VANNATTER AND LANGE WERE THE CO-LEAD INVESTIGATORS ON THE SIMPSON CASE, WEREN'T YOU?
THERE HAVE BEEN CASES IN THE PAST WHEN POLICE OFFICERS HAVE HAD AN OCCASION TO ENTER A HOME WHEN CLAIMS HAVE BEEN MADE AGAINST THE POLICE DEPARTMENT SUCH AS THINGS WERE MISSING... WHAT WE LIKE TO DO IS COME IN AND DOCUMENT THE CONDITION OF THE HOME AT THAT TIME SO THAT IF IT WAS EVER NEEDED AGAIN, WE COULD SHOW THAT THAT WAS THERE, WAS NOT THERE.
SOMETIMES IF THE DETECTIVE IS REVIEWING THIS VIDEOTAPE AND NOTICES SOMETHING ELSE, THEY MAY WANT TO REVISIT THAT LOCATION.
I WENT TO THE BUNDY LOCATION. WE DID NOT DO ANY VIDEO... WE WERE NOT REQUESTED TO DO SO.
SPECIFIC EVIDENCE WAS NOT TO BE PHOTOGRAPHED.