BY MR. BAILEY: HOW LONG DID IT TAKE YOU TO DRIVE INTO THE WEST LOS ANGELES POLICE STATION IN YOUR AUTOMOBILE?
DURING THE TIME THAT YOU WERE DRIVING TO THE WEST LOS ANGELES POLICE STATION, WERE YOU THINKING ABOUT THE INVESTIGATION THAT WAS ABOUT TO UNFOLD?
WERE YOU THINKING ABOUT THE FACT THAT IN ALL PROBABILITY, THERE MIGHT BE GREAT MEDIA ATTENTION TO THIS PARTICULAR HOMICIDE IF THE VICTIM WAS AS DESCRIBED?
DID YOU CONTEMPLATE IN ANY WAY THAT THE CRIME SCENE WOULD BE CRAWLING WITH NEWS MEDIA THE MINUTE THE DISCOVERY WAS MADE THAT THE VICTIM WAS MR. SIMPSON'S WIFE, IF IT WERE?
NOW, WHEN YOU ARRIVED AT THE POLICE STATION, YOU AND DETECTIVE PHILLIPS -- AND BY THE WAY, WHO GOT THERE FIRST, IF YOU REMEMBER?
YEAH. DID YOU AND DETECTIVE PHILLIPS TAKE ONE OF THE AUTOMOBILES THAT BELONGS TO THE POLICE DEPARTMENT?
WELL, I WASN'T INTERESTED IN SO MUCH THE MAKE AND MODEL AS THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE TO WHICH IT'S ALLOCATED.
NOW, MAY WE LEARN WHAT A HOMICIDE KIT CONSISTS OF? I ASSUME YOU'VE BEEN THROUGH THEM MORE THAN ONCE.
IN THE BOTTOM OF THE HOMICIDE KIT, YOU HAVE USUALLY COVERALLS, PLIERS, ROPES, GLOVES, SOMETIMES --
YOU COULD HAVE LIKE WORK GLOVES THAT YOU WOULD USE TO MAYBE CLIMB DOWN A ROPE IF YOU WERE GOING INTO A RAVINE OR SOME INACCESSIBLE AREA YOU HAVE TO GET DOWN TO A SCENE.
WE SAW -- WELL, DID YOU SEE DETECTIVE LANGE AT ANY TIME THAT DAY WITH SOME RUBBER GLOVES ON?
YOU WOULD HAVE RULERS, TAPE MEASURES, ANY NECESSARY REPORTS, PLASTIC BAGS, ENVELOPES, WRITING UTENSILS, GREASE PENCILS, RULERS, COMPASS.
DID YOU AND DETECTIVE PHILLIPS DISCUSS WITHOUT GOING INTO THE CONVERSATION -- JUST YES OR NO -- THE POSSIBLE SIGNIFICANCE OF THIS PARTICULAR HOMICIDE AS IT MIGHT AFFECT THE PUBLIC AND THE MEDIA?
SO NO MENTION OF THAT WAS MADE AS YOU WERE MEETING AT THE WEST LOS ANGELES POLICE STATION AND WHILE YOU WERE GETTING INTO THE HOMICIDE-EQUIPPED VEHICLE.
AND YOU AGREE THAT YOUR ARRIVAL TIME -- I ASSUME YOU DO BECAUSE OF YOUR OWN NOTES -- WAS 2:10 A.M.?
ALL RIGHT. NOW, DID YOU LEARN THAT SERGEANT ROSSI HAD BEEN THERE SINCE EARLY ON, SOMETIME BEFORE YOU?
DID YOU KNOW OFFICER RISKE PRIOR TO YOUR INTRODUCTION TO HIM IN CONNECTION WITH THIS INVESTIGATION?
OKAY. NOW, I TAKE IT THAT WHEN YOU ARRIVED AT THE SCENE, YOU HAD QUITE A FEW QUESTIONS AS THE INITIAL DETECTIVE TAKING OVER THE CASE?
INITIALLY, I DIDN'T SAY HARDLY ANYTHING. DETECTIVE PHILLIPS TOOK THE LEAD TALKING TO SERGEANT ROSSI.
OKAY. NOW, CAN YOU GIVE ME SOME IDEA OF THE BREAK-UP IN RESPONSIBILITIES BETWEEN YOU AND DETECTIVE PHILLIPS? HAD YOU WORKED A PRIOR HOMICIDE TOGETHER?
THERE ARE CERTAIN TASKS THAT HAVE TO BE LOOKED AFTER IMMEDIATELY AFTER YOU GET ON THE SCENE, CORRECT?
DO YOU FELLOWS DIVIDE UP THESE RESPONSIBILITIES OR DOES HE JUST TAKE CONTROL AND DIRECT YOU TO DO CERTAIN THINGS?
ALL RIGHT. NOW, DID YOU AND DETECTIVE PHILLIPS HAVE ANY CONVERSATION WHEREBY YOU ALLOCATED THE WORK TO BE DONE AT THIS PARTICULAR SCENE?
WELL, WAS -- DO YOU KNOW IF IT WAS CONTEMPLATED THAT YOU WOULD WORK SIDE BY SIDE OR THAT YOU WOULD GO OFF IN DIFFERENT DIRECTIONS?
WELL, DETECTIVE PHILLIPS WAS THE HOMICIDE COORDINATOR. SO HE WOULD NOT BE TAKING A LEAD ROLE. IT WOULD BE ONE OF THE OTHER DETECTIVES THAT HAD BEEN CALLED IN THAT HAD NOT YET ARRIVED.
OKAY. NOW, WHAT OTHER DETECTIVES HAD BEEN CALLED IN THAT YOU LEARNED ABOUT WHEN YOU GOT THERE?
ALL RIGHT. AND YOU SAY THAT SINCE HE'S THE HOMICIDE COORDINATOR, I GATHER THE THRUST OF THAT IS THAT YOU HAD TO DO THE FOOTWORK SO TO SPEAK?
WELL, WORKING WITH DETECTIVE PHILLIPS, HE USUALLY CONDUCTS MOST OF YOUR ADMINISTRATIVE NOTIFICATIONS.
ALL RIGHT. NOW, WHAT DID YOU FIRST ADDRESS OF THE MANY THINGS THAT YOU MIGHT HAVE LOOKED AT WHEN YOU ARRIVED AT THE SCENE?
ALL RIGHT. WELL, THERE ARE CERTAIN THINGS THAT NEED TO BE ADDRESSED WHENEVER A HOMICIDE OCCURS, RIGHT?
AND YOU KNEW THIS BOTH BY VIRTUE OF YOUR TRAINING, YOUR EXPERIENCES AS PATROLMAN AT 10 OTHER HOMICIDE INVESTIGATIONS, RIGHT?
ALL RIGHT. IF THE VICTIMS AREN'T QUITE DEAD AS SOMETIMES IS THE CASE, THAT'S PRIORITY NUMBER ONE, TREATMENT AND ATTENTION OF THE VICTIMS, RIGHT?
OKAY. THE PROTECTION OF OTHERS WHO MAY BE IN DANGER BECAUSE OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES EVIDENT AT THE CRIME SCENE WOULD BE PROBABLY THE NEXT CONSIDERATION; WOULD IT NOT?
YOU KNEW THE CHILDREN HAD BEEN IN THE HOUSE AND HAD BEEN TAKEN TO THE SAFETY OF THE POLICE STATION?
OKAY. PRESERVING THE INTEGRITY OF THE CRIME SCENE IS A VERY, VERY IMPORTANT TASK; IS IT NOT?
WHAT ELSE HAD BEEN DONE TO YOUR KNOWLEDGE TO PRESERVE THE INTEGRITY OF THE CRIME SCENE BEFORE YOU TOOK OVER?
WHAT I SAW WAS, THE OFFICERS DID A VERY GOOD JOB IN SEALING OFF A VERY, VERY LARGE AREA CONSIDERING THAT THEIR ONLY KNOWLEDGE WAS THAT THE CRIME SCENE INVOLVED ONE ADDRESS OR ONE RESIDENCE. THEY SEALED OFF A VERY LARGE AREA AND HAD UNIFORMED PERSONNEL WITH THEIR VEHICLES AT DIFFERENT LOCATIONS TO KEEP THAT AREA SECURE AND ANY UNAUTHORIZED PEOPLE FROM ENTERING.
ALL RIGHT. WHAT ABOUT THE NEED TO NOTIFY EXPERTS, CRIMINALISTS AND OTHERS TO COME TO THE SCENE WHILE THE EVIDENCE IS STILL FRESH? DID THAT CROSS YOUR MIND AT ALL THAT MORNING?
OKAY. WELL, DID YOU DEVELOP AN INTEREST SOON AFTER YOUR ARRIVAL AS TO THE TIME OF DEATH OF EACH OF THE VICTIMS?
I NEVER GOT TO THE POINT TO EVEN GIVE AN OPINION AS TO MODE OF DEATH AND I WOULD LEAVE THAT TO THE CORONER'S INVESTIGATOR.
OKAY. WELL, YOU KNEW THAT THEY WERE DEAD BY A LITTLE AFTER MIDNIGHT, DIDN'T YOU, BASED ON THE INFORMATION YOU WERE GIVEN?
YOU WERE WELL SATISFIED BY WHAT RISKE TOLD YOU AND WHAT YOU SAW WITH YOUR OWN EYES THAT NICOLE BROWN SIMPSON WAS INDEED THE FEMALE VICTIM, WEREN'T YOU?
I HAD NO IDEA. I COULD NOT SEE HER FACE. I COULD NOT -- THERE WAS NO IDENTIFICATION. SO AT THAT TIME, I BELIEVE IT WAS ASSUMED, BUT NOT KNOWN.
THERE WASN'T ANY QUESTION IN ANYBODY'S MIND AT 2:10 A.M. THAT NICOLE BROWN SIMPSON WAS DEAD, WAS THERE?
UH-HUH. AND DID YOU SEE A LIST OF PHONE NUMBERS ON THE KITCHEN WALL WHICH INCLUDED THAT OF O.J. SIMPSON?
OKAY. NOW, HAD YOU AND DETECTIVE PHILLIPS DISCUSSED AT THIS POINT THE MANNER IN WHICH MR. SIMPSON WOULD BE NOTIFIED?
WHEN DID YOU FIRST LEARN THAT SPECIAL RULES HAD BEEN ISSUED BY THE BRASS IN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT AS TO HOW MR. SIMPSON WOULD BE NOTIFIED?
YOU'RE LEARNING TODAY THAT PHILLIPS WAS TOLD TO TELL HIM PERSONALLY RATHER THAN OVER THE TELEPHONE?
NO. I THOUGHT YOU MEANT SPECIAL, SPECIAL WAY THAT WE WERE GOING TO NOTIFY, BEST DESIRABLE IN ANY CASE. I ONLY LEARNED FROM DETECTIVE PHILLIPS WHILE WE WERE IN THE VEHICLE THAT WE WERE GOING UP TO THE ROCKINGHAM ADDRESS TO MAKE A NOTIFICATION.
ALL RIGHT. NOW, I WONDER IF YOU COULD HELP US, DETECTIVE FUHRMAN, AND JUST GIVE US YOUR BEST RECOLLECTION OF YOUR WHEREABOUTS AT VARIOUS TIMES THAT ARE RELEVANT TO YOUR EXPERIENCES THAT MORNING, PLEASE, IN VIEW OF THE DEFENSE. YOU RECEIVED A CALL FROM PHILLIPS AT 1:05?
OKAY. AND HAVING ARRIVED AT THE CRIME SCENE AT 2:10, I WOULD ASSUME THAT YOU LEFT THE STATION ABOUT 2:05.
OKAY. NOW, IF YOU CAN, PLEASE TRY TO TELL US WHAT YOU WERE DOING AT 2:15, FIVE MINUTES AFTER YOU ARRIVED AT THE CRIME SCENE.
I BELIEVE I WAS LISTENING TO EITHER SERGEANT ROSSI OR OFFICER RISKE EXPLAIN WHAT THEY HAD DISCOVERED.
OKAY. HOW LONG DID YOU SPEND AT THAT LOCATION GETTING THIS INFORMATION BEFORE YOU MOVED TO SOMEWHERE ELSE?
A FEW MOMENTS. JUST LONG ENOUGH TO MAKE A FEW STATEMENTS ABOUT HOW THE BODIES WERE DISCOVERED.
OKAY. WELL, A MOMENT DOESN'T HAVE A VERY CONCRETE DEFINITION. CAN YOU JUST GIVE US IN MINUTES?
ALL RIGHT. SO IS IT FAIR TO SAY THAT BY 2:15, YOU WERE LEAVING THE IMMEDIATE CRIME SCENE AND WALKING SOUTH ON DOROTHY?
I THINK THAT WOULD BE RATHER QUICK. WE TRIED TO APPROACH TO THE FRONT OF THE RESIDENCE, BUT THEN WE TURNED AROUND AND THEN WE WENT DOWN TOWARDS DOROTHY.
WOULD IT BE MORE FAIR TO SAY BETWEEN 2:15 AND 2:25, YOU LEFT THE CRIME SCENE WHERE YOU, PHILLIPS AND RISKE HAD BEEN LOOKING AT THE BODIES AND WALKED BACK OUT TO THE SIDEWALK AND SOUTH ON DOROTHY?
TOO MUCH. ALL RIGHT. I UNDERSTAND YOU SAID 2:15 WOULD BE TOO SOON. AND MY QUESTION NOW IS, WOULD IT BE BETWEEN 2:15 AND NO LATER THAN 2:25?
OKAY. SO BY 2:20, YOU WERE ON THE MOVE. NOW, YOU'VE DESCRIBED HOW YOU WALKED THROUGH THE SHRUBBERY I BELIEVE YOU SAID FROM OFF THE PICTURE AS YOU WERE LOOKING AT A PHOTOGRAPH OF THE SCENE AND COULD VIEW THE BODY OF NICOLE BROWN SIMPSON, BUT DID NOT HAVE A VERY GOOD VIEW OF THE BODY OF THE OTHER VICTIM FROM THAT VANTAGE POINT. AM I CORRECTLY SUMMARIZING WHAT HAPPENED?
ALL RIGHT. IN ORDER TO ATTAIN A BETTER PERSPECTIVE, YOU QUESTIONED RISKE, AS A RESULT OF WHICH YOU WALKED DOWN BUNDY TO DOROTHY AND AROUND -- UP THE ALLEY AND INTO THE SIMPSON HOME, CORRECT?
AND OUT THE FRONT DOOR WHICH YOU UNDERSTOOD WAS FOUND OPEN BY THE OFFICERS FIRST ON THE SCENE.
CAN YOU DESCRIBE THE LIGHTING CONDITIONS THAT EXISTED AT THE MOMENT THAT YOU WALKED OUT THAT FRONT DOOR?
I BELIEVE THERE WAS LIGHT COMING FROM THE INSIDE OF THE RESIDENCE CASCADING DOWN ONTO THE WALKWAY.
IS THAT SUGGESTING THAT THE NAKED EYE COULD SEE MOST OF THE DETAIL OF THE CRIME SCENE WITHOUT THE AID OF ARTIFICIAL ILLUMINATION BY VIRTUE OF THAT LIGHT?
THEN PRIOR TO THE TIME THAT YOU WALKED AROUND TO THE REAR OF THE RESIDENCE, THE ONLY PLACE YOU HAD BEEN IS WITH THE OTHERS IN THE SHRUBBERY AT THE GATEPOST AS YOU PUT IT?
OKAY. AT WHAT TIME WOULD YOU SAY YOU ENTERED THE RESIDENCE ASSUMING THAT YOU LEFT AT 2:20 FROM THE IMMEDIATE CRIME SCENE?
OKAY. DO YOU KNOW THE DISTANCE FROM THE IMMEDIATE CRIME SCENE AROUND THE BACK WAY INTO THE HOUSE?
OKAY. WELL, THREE AND A HALF MILES AN HOUR IS 319 -- 309 FEET A MINUTE AND FOUR IS 352. DO YOU THINK THAT THE DISTANCE WAS LESS THAN THAT?
OKAY. SO YOU THINK IT WAS ABOUT 300 AND SOME ODD FEET THAT YOU TRAVERSED TO GET TO THE HOUSE?
WHEN YOU ENTERED THE HOME, DID YOU GO DIRECTLY OUT THE FRONT DOOR TO VIEW THE BODIES ONCE AGAIN OR DID YOU AT THAT TIME BEGIN TO WALK AROUND AND MAKE OBSERVATIONS?
ALL RIGHT. THE PURPOSE IN TAKING THAT ROUTE WAS TO GET BACK TO WHERE YOU HAD STARTED, BUT IN A DIFFERENT PLACE, RIGHT?
AND TO GET THERE WITHOUT WALKING THROUGH THE POOLING OF BLOOD THAT WAS AROUND THE AREA, THAT WAS YOUR PURPOSE, RIGHT?
HOW LONG WOULD YOU SAY YOU SPENT AT THE CRIME SCENE FROM THAT VANTAGE POINT UP ON THE STEPS I BELIEVE YOU TOLD US ON THAT OCCASION?
ONCE OFFICER RISKE BROUGHT US OUT INTO THE LANDING? JUST LONG ENOUGH TO POINT OUT A FEW ITEMS OF EVIDENCE, SHOW US THE FOOTPRINTS AND THEN WALK US BACK ALONG THE RIGHT SIDE OF THOSE SHOEPRINTS.
OKAY. AND YOU MADE THE OBSERVATIONS YOU DESCRIBED FOR US ON DIRECT EXAMINATION ABOUT MR. GOLDMAN, THE OTHER EVIDENCE THAT WAS LYING AROUND?
OKAY. THESE ARE THINGS HE HAD DISCOVERED AND HE WAS SHOWING THEM TO YOU. THESE WERE NOT THINGS THAT YOU WERE DISCOVERING AS A DETECTIVE, RIGHT?
BUT HE ALREADY KNEW THEY WERE THERE. YOU FELLOWS WEREN'T MAKING A DISCOVERY AT THAT POINT, WERE YOU?
AND HE TOLD YOU THAT HE HAD SEEN THEM THERE WHEN HE FIRST CAME ON THE SCENE A LITTLE AFTER MIDNIGHT?
WE WALKED DOWN ALONG THE PATHWAY THAT'S ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE RESIDENCE, LOOKED AT THE GATE.
RIGHT. NOW, YOU'VE DESCRIBED A PATH THAT GOES DOWN SOME STEPS, LEVELS OUT AND GOES UP SOME STEPS AND OUT THE BACK GATE, CORRECT?
DID I UNDERSTAND YOU TO SAY THAT THE LAST BLOODY FOOTPRINT THAT YOU SAW THAT NIGHT WAS ON THE CONCRETE BEFORE YOU GO DOWN THE FIRST SET OF STEPS?
YEAH. HAVE IN MIND THAT STEPS GO UP, THERE'S A FLAT AREA GOING BY THE ENTRANCE TO THE HOME, STEPS GO DOWN, LEVELS OUT AGAIN, STEPS GO UP AND THEN YOU GO OUT THE BACK GATE. HAVE THAT SCENARIO IN MIND? DO YOU REMEMBER THAT NOW?
OKAY. IS IT CORRECT THAT THE BLOODY FOOTPRINTS THAT YOU SAW DID NOT EXTEND BEYOND THE FIRST FLAT LEVEL?
BY MR. BAILEY: YOU HAVE REFERRED TO THE DEPRESSED AREA IN THE PAST AS A TROTH OF SOME SORT; HAVE YOU NOT?
OKAY. NOW, MY QUESTION IS, DID ANY FOOTPRINTS GO DOWN THE STEPS OR INTO THE TROTH THAT YOU SAW THAT NIGHT?
SHOEPRINTS, FOOTPRINTS. HAVE YOU HAD SOME CLASSES, SOME ON-THE-JOB TRAINING OR ANYTHING THAT WOULD EDUCATE YOU AS TO THE KINDS OF FOOTPRINTS THAT CAN BE FOUND AT A CRIME SCENE AND HOW THEY CAN BE ISOLATED AND PRESERVED?
I THINK IT WAS INCLUDED IN THE CRIMINALIST'S ABILITY AT CONDUCTING SOME INVESTIGATIONS AT A SCENE.
HOLD ON. MR. BAILEY, WOULD YOU ALLOW THE WITNESS TO FINISH THE ANSWER BEFORE YOU START THE NEXT QUESTION?
BY MR. BAILEY: IMPRINT IS THE KIND OF FOOTPRINT THAT YOU MIGHT FIND IN SOIL, SAND OR SNOW, RIGHT?
OKAY. SO THAT IF THERE WERE ANY LATENT FOOTPRINTS THAT WERE ON THAT WALKWAY THAT NIGHT, THAT'S SOMETHING THAT ONLY THE CRIMINALIST COULD LIKELY PICK UP, CORRECT?
IN OTHER WORDS, IF THERE HAD BEEN TWO PEOPLE, ONE STEPPED IN BLOOD AND THE OTHER DIDN'T, THERE MIGHT BE SOME LATENT FOOTPRINTS AROUND TO BE DETECTED BY SOMEBODY PROPERLY TRAINED; FAIR STATEMENT?
IF A LATENT FOOTPRINT, SHOEPRINT IS ONE THAT CANNOT BE SEEN WITH THE NAKED EYE BUT MUST NONETHELESS BE PROTECTED, YOU CAN ONLY PROTECT THE AREA WHERE IT MIGHT BE, CORRECT, NOT A SPECIFIC SPOT IN THAT AREA?
ALL RIGHT. AND A CRIMINALIST MIGHT LATER COME ALONG AND EITHER WITH ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT OR OBLIQUE LIGHT FIND SOME SHOEPRINT IN THE DUST THAT YOU HADN'T BEEN ABLE TO SEE FOR LACK OF TRAINING AND EXPERIENCE, TRUE?
ALL RIGHT. AND MY QUESTION IS WHETHER THE CRIME SCENE THAT YOU WERE WALKING ON AS YOU WENT BACK UP THAT WALKWAY WITH OFFICER RISKE WAS BEING PROTECTED IN THAT FASHION.
NOW, AFTER YOU ARRIVED AT THE BACK GATE, WHAT TIME WOULD YOU SAY IT WAS THEN AS YOU ARRIVED?
I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE TIME LINE WOULD BE AT THAT POINT. IT WOULD PROBABLY TAKE US A COUPLE MORE MINUTES TO WALK BACK AND MAKE THE OBSERVATIONS ON THE GATE.
ALL RIGHT. NOW, BEFORE YOU REENTERED THE HOUSE, DID YOU OR HAD YOU BEGUN TO DEVELOP A PICTURE OF THIS CRIME SCENE AND TO HAVE SOME IDEAS AS TO WHAT MIGHT BE RELEVANT AND WHAT MIGHT NOT IN THE COURSE OF THE INVESTIGATION YOU WERE ABOUT TO CONDUCT?
ALL RIGHT. RISKE HAD BEEN DOING HIS BEST PRIOR TO YOUR ARRIVAL TO DO THE THINGS HE HAD BEEN TRAINED TO DO, CORRECT?
AND THOSE ARE THE KINDS OF THINGS THAT YOU WERE TRAINED TO DO WHEN YOU WERE A PATROLMAN AT HOMICIDE SCENES AS OPPOSED TO A DETECTIVE?
AND AS I RECALL FROM YOUR NOTES, YOU SAID THE RESIDENTS WOULDN'T OPEN THE DOOR. SO NOBODY LEARNED MUCH.
DID YOU INQUIRE ABOUT WHETHER THE CRIME SCENE HAD BEEN SEARCHED AND ITS SURROUND FOR ANY EVIDENCE OF WEAPONS, CLOTHING OR OTHER IMPLEMENTS OF CRIME?
RISKE DIDN'T TELL YOU THAT THE AREA HAD BEEN LOOKED AT, GARBAGE CANS, DIPSEY-DUMPSTERS AND SO FORTH?
ALL RIGHT. NOW, WOULD YOU AGREE THAT WHEN THERE IS DELAY IN A HOMICIDE INVESTIGATION, NUMBER ONE, THE PERPETRATORS OR PERPETRATOR, AS THE CASE MAY BE, HAVE A CHANCE TO GET FURTHER AND FURTHER AWAY FROM THE SCENE, CORRECT?
THEY HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY PERHAPS TO PLANT EVIDENCE, TO MISLEAD THE DETECTIVES AS TIME GOES BY?
AND THEY HAVE TIME TO STRUCTURE FALSE ALIBIS ALL DURING THIS PERIOD THAT THEY ARE NOT BEING APPREHENDED?
WELL, IF THEY'RE NOT APPREHENDED, PRESUMABLY THEY HAVE THE SAME FREEDOM THAT PERMITTED THEM TO ACCOMPLISH THE GRISLY SCENE THAT YOU HAD JUST VIEWED, TRUE?
I COULDN'T SPECULATE ON A CRIMINAL'S INTENT WHETHER HE KILLED ONCE OR A HUNDRED.
BY MR. BAILEY: WELL, IT SEEMED TO ME THAT A LITTLE LATER THAT DAY, YOU WERE SPECULATING PRETTY HEAVILY ON PEOPLE'S SAFETY AND INTENT; WERE YOU NOT? ABOUT 5:00 THAT MORNING, WHEN YOU WENT OVER THE WALK, WASN'T THAT BECAUSE OF A CONCERN FOR SAFETY?
BY MR. BAILEY: ALL RIGHT. WHEN DID YOU GO INTO THE HOUSE AS BEST YOU CAN RECALL TO MAKE YOUR NOTES?
DID YOU GIVE ANY DIRECTION TO ANY OF THE OFFICERS AT THE SCENE PRIOR TO SITTING DOWN TO MAKE THE NOTES THAT WE'VE ALL VIEWED AS TO THINGS THEY OUGHT TO DO OR OUGHT NOT TO DO?
ALL RIGHT. NOW, AS YOU UNDERSTOOD IT, WHEN YOU AND DETECTIVE PHILLIPS WALKED UP TO THAT POST, WHAT WERE THE RULES ENFORCED ABOUT PEOPLE GOING TO THE CRIME SCENE, THE AREA WHERE YOU WERE STANDING?
WHICH PEOPLE, IF ANY, WERE ALLOWED TO GO INSIDE THE YELLOW TAPE OF THOSE WHO WERE PRESENT WHEN YOU ARRIVED AT 2:10 A.M.?
ALL RIGHT. NOW, YOU HAVE MENTIONED THAT EVENT A NUMBER OF OCCASIONS. CAN YOU TELL US, ACCORDING TO YOUR BEST RECOLLECTION, WHEN IT WAS THAT DETECTIVE PHILLIPS SAID, "ROBBERY-HOMICIDE IS TAKING OVER THIS CASE"?
OKAY. SO THAT IF YOU GOT THERE AT 2:10, THEN ABOUT 2:50 OR THEREABOUTS, YOU LEARNED THAT THIS CASE WAS NO LONGER YOURS TO LEAD, CORRECT?
YOU WERE IN THE PROCESS OF WRITING YOUR NOTES ABOUT 10 MINUTES OF 3:00 WHEN YOU GOT THIS INFORMATION AS I UNDERSTAND IT?
AND DID YOU CEASE WRITING YOUR NOTES AT THAT POINT BECAUSE YOU HAD BEEN RELIEVED OR BECAUSE YOU LEARNED YOU HAD BEEN RELIEVED?
I COMPLETED THE NOTES. WHEN DETECTIVE PHILLIPS TOLD ME THAT WE WERE RELIEVED OF THIS, I COMPLETED THE NOTES THAT I HAD STARTED.
OH, THERE WAS ONLY TWO OR THREE POINTS THAT I WANTED TO PUT ON THE NOTES THAT WERE OF CONCERN.
OKAY. NOW, ON ANOTHER SUBJECT JUST BRIEFLY, MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT YOU WERE INSTRUCTED BY SOMEONE LAST FALL TO WATCH THE LARRY KING SHOW?
YES. I BELIEVE IT WAS EITHER HIS -- I BELIEVE IT WAS HIS GRANDFATHER WHO WAS A FAMOUS AVIATOR.
NOW, HOW MANY TIMES DID YOU MAKE THE ACQUAINTANCE OF MR. FAUS IN THAT STATION OR IN THE SAME GENERAL AREA?
WELL, WHEN YOU SAY YOU DON'T RECALL, DOES THAT MEAN IT MAY HAVE HAPPENED, BUT YOU CAN'T NOW DREDGE UP ANY RECOLLECTION OF THE EVENT OR YOU'RE PRETTY CERTAIN IT NEVER HAPPENED? WHICH DO YOU MEAN BY THAT?
OKAY. NOW, IN ORDER TO DETERMINE THAT, YOU ARE RELYING ON HER IMAGE BEING SHOWN ON A TELEVISION SHOW WHILE SHE WAS BEING INTERVIEWED, CORRECT?
DID YOU EVER MEET A WOMAN THAT LOOKS LIKE THE LADY ON THE LARRY KING SHOW BY SOME OTHER NAME?
THAT WASN'T MY QUESTION. WERE YOU SATISFIED AFTER FIVE MINUTES -- AND I TAKE IT YOU DISCONTINUED VIEWING THE SHOW -- THAT THE WOMAN BEING INTERVIEWED BY LARRY KING AND IDENTIFYING HERSELF AS KATHLEEN BELL WAS SOMEONE YOU HAD NEVER MET?
OKAY. IS IT NOT TRUE THAT YOU WOULD HAVE RECOLLECTED SUCH A PERSON IF YOU HAD MET THEM UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES SHE DESCRIBED WITHOUT GOING INTO WHAT THEY WERE?
THAT KIND OF THING WOULD IMPRESS YOUR MEMORY THE SAME WAY THE MEETING OF O.J. SIMPSON WOULD; WOULD IT NOT?
OKAY. AND IF YOU HAD ENGAGED IN THAT CONDUCT WITH THE WOMAN WHOSE IMAGE YOU WERE LOOKING AT, THAT'S NOT SOMETHING YOU WOULD SOON FORGET, IS IT?
KEY QUOTEBY MR. BAILEY: DETECTIVE FUHRMAN, WOULD YOU TAKE A LOOK AT THIS PHOTOGRAPH OF A BLOND WOMAN AND TELL ME WHETHER OR NOT THAT IS THE PERSON THAT WAS BEING INTERVIEWED BY LARRY KING WHEN YOU WATCHED THE SHOW AT THE REQUEST OF THE PROSECUTION.
PLANTING EVIDENCE? NO, IT ISN'T.
WHAT I'M CERTAIN IS IS THAT I DIDN'T MEET KATHLEEN BELL AT THAT LOCATION.
WHAT SHE WAS DISCUSSING WAS FAIRLY OUTRAGEOUS CONDUCT; IS IT NOT?
AND IF YOU HAD ENGAGED IN THAT CONDUCT WITH THE WOMAN WHOSE IMAGE YOU WERE LOOKING AT, THAT'S NOT SOMETHING YOU WOULD SOON FORGET, IS IT? / NO.