Yes. We are going to object to the display of any knives that are not directly related to any injuries or to any evidence in this case merely to describe classification of knives as being something that is within everybody's understanding without need of demonstration. And, too, that the prejudicial effect of showing brand new razor sharp knives to the jury outweighs any probative value, and clearly the Court--and clearly the Court can take judicial notice and even would stipulate to the Court that to--to the jury that there are single-edged knives, double-edged knives, serrated knives, bowie knives, hunting knives and any other type of knife you wish to enumerate. But just to simply point out shiny steel blades to me is prejudicial and we strenuously object.
Your Honor, Mr. Shapiro strenuously objected several days ago and the Court overruled the objection and allowed us to use these knives to demonstrate the class characteristics in the knives and has indicated nothing new which in my judgment causes the Court to change its mind and that is all we are attempting to do. Not indicating whether they are dull or sharp isn't the issue because no one is suggesting that any of these were attributable to Mr. Simpson or anyone of these is the murder weapon. I also have to say for the record, your Honor, I don't like to object, although when counsel makes speaking objections, my understanding is the Court has made it quite clear that there are not to be speaking objections and Mr. Shapiro has made a series of speaking objections. His Clark passed me a note that she finds it difficult to have that allowed. Again, I'm more forgiving, and maybe that is because I'm not going to be down here arguing the case to the jury, but for the record, I think it is inappropriate for the manner in which Mr. Shapiro has made a number of these speaking objections and I do press that objection.
All right. So far I haven't found any of the speaking objections to be out of line, since they save us a trip here to the side bar oftentimes. But the objection made is overruled because I think that the demonstrative value is--does outweigh.
May I say something? Would the Court consider some kind of a cautionary thing of they are not going into the jury room, obviously, so shouldn't the Court--or shouldn't there be some questions, in fairness, bringing out early on these are not any weapons--
Yes. Mr. Cochran, if you recollect, I instructed the Prosecution that they had to make clear in their questioning that this was demonstrative purposes only, that there is no connection between this knife, these knives and--
just to simply point out shiny steel blades to me is prejudicial and we strenuously object.
Not indicating whether they are dull or sharp isn't the issue because no one is suggesting that any of these were attributable to Mr. Simpson or anyone of these is the murder weapon.
the objection made is overruled because I think that the demonstrative value is--does outweigh.
Unless the court reporter is about to die.