I am. I want to finish with him today so badly. So that's why. I wanted to show him like one picture of the crime scene and ask him all the opportunities for swiping or compression transfer demonstrated by the conditions there. And I think another--a fair area of inquiry, given the fact he's gone into some lengths--he testified to the manner in which the stain could have been applied. You know, counsel would like to confine all this to conspiracy and all kinds of sinister things, but this witness has not allowed him to be so limited, and I think it's only fair that we allow for the possibility--
You're going to ask him to look at the crime scene photos and say, is there anything here that looks like it could have caused this transfer? Is that what you are going to say?
No. Really what I'm asking is, look, if the Defendant is there, he pulls back her neck, he steps back over the bloody neck or he steps or he brushes the ankle up against the blood step, isn't that a likely source of the blood that you see on there or likely manner in which it can be applied.
She said in front of the jury she never received those notes from the witness.
KEY QUOTEYou know, what they call a statement is two pages of notes. He got three. He's got three.
All right. I just want to resolve this issue first. This issue with the crime scene photos, I don't think so.
Okay. Let me ask--if I ask him and he says he has seen them, can I ask him a hypothetical about how the compression or swipe could have occurred? Your Honor, if you don't allow me to ask questions that lay the foundation, how can I argue?
No. He said blood--you know, a rubbing motion across the fiber. That's enough to say any number of things.
You know--wait, wait, wait. How can I be cut off from asking questions of how a compression or swipe could have occurred?
You can ask that question; how can these things occur, in your experience, how do these things occur?
Sounds like argument to me.
if the Defendant is there, he pulls back her neck, he steps back over the bloody neck or he steps or he brushes the ankle up against the blood step, isn't that a likely source of the blood that you see on there or likely manner in which it can be applied.
She said in front of the jury she never received those notes from the witness. Right there, three pages. You crossed it out because there were three pages.
Enough help for them; don't you think?